PER CURIAM.
Appellant argues that failure to announce imposition of restitution at sentencing or give appellant notice of the intent to impose restitution and the right to have a hearing thereon was reversible error. This issue was not, however, preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1st DCA 1998); Lorenzana v. State, 717 So.2d 119 (Fla.4th DCA 1998). The remaining issues raised on appeal are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, C.J., BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., CONCUR.