AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RUPERT HIGGINS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The motion court had previously directed the corporate defendant to appear by attorney, as required by CPLR 321(a), within 30 days, or face default. Having failed to do so, the default judgment against it was properly granted. There is no merit to defendants' argument that CCA 1809(2) entitles the corporate defendant to appear herein by an authorized officer.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAIL BOXES ETC. USA, INC. v. HIGGINS
(Mar 6, 2001)