Plaintiff sustained a fractured ankle when he slipped while walking down a wet stairway at defendant's subway station. Plaintiff, who contended that the stairs were unreasonably dangerous when wet because of their worn and chipped condition, was not holding onto the wet stairway's handrail when he fell. The jury unanimously found that plaintiff had descended the stairway in a negligent manner, but found, with one dissent, that plaintiff's negligence had not been a substantial factor in the causation of the accident. Based on our review of the trial record, we find the verdict to be against the manifest weight of the evidence to the extent it determines that plaintiff's negligence did not play any role in causing his injuries. We therefore reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial, unless plaintiff stipulates to entry of an amended judgment as indicated.
We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing on this record.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.