Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RODNEY BRUCE PETERS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to defendant, by granting judgment declaring that defendant has no duty to indemnify in connection with the underlying personal injury action and, as so modified, affirmed (see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, cert denied 371 U.S. 901). State Farm demonstrated as a matter of law that the policy exclusion for "bodily injury," which is either "expected or intended by an insured" or "which is the result of willful and malicious acts of an insured," precludes coverage of the incident at issue (see Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mugavero, 79 N.Y.2d 153). Moreover, State Farm, which learned of the claim in January 1992 and issued reservation of rights letters in February, concluded its investigation and timely disclaimed coverage based on the policy exclusion on April 9, 1992.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order modified, with costs to defendant, by declaring that defendant has no duty to indemnify in connection with the underlying personal injury action and, as so modified, affirmed, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETERS v. STATE FARM FIRE CAS. CO
(Oct 30, 2003)