AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CECILIO FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant.

After the trial was interrupted by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the court properly exercised its discretion when it denied defendant's request for an inquiry as to whether those events had affected any of the jurors' ability to continue serving. There were no indications that any juror possessed a state of mind that would prevent the rendering of an impartial verdict ( see generally People v. Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. FIGUEROA
(Feb 5, 2004)