Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewed in the light most favorable to the presentment agency, the evidence was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and which constituted the crime of unlawful possession of weapon by a person under 16 ( see Penal Law § 265.01; § 265.05; Matter of Crystal R., 10 AD3d 397; Matter of Lashana H., 34 AD3d 479; Matter of Kiara R., 29 AD3d 703; Matter of Clarence C., 166 AD2d 442). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the determination was not against the weight of the evidence ( cf. CPL 470.15).