Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Arthur O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael F. EASLEY; M.D. Congleton; City of Wendell; Chief of Police Department; L. Houpe; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint as frivolous, sanctioning him $3000 and enjoining him from filing anything in the district court without first getting leave of court. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Armstrong v. Easley, No. 5:06-cv-00495-D (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2006). We deny Armstrong's motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARMSTRONG v. EASLEY
(May 3, 2007)