Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of: Jack E. PRATT, Jr., Debtor Cadle Company, Appellant v. Jack E. Pratt, Jr., Appellee.

PER CURIAM:[fn*] [fn*] Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The Order of the district court affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying Cadle Company's motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), entered October 26, 2006, is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court. The Order of the district court denying the motion to recuse and alternate motion to reassign appeal, entered September 7, 2006, is affirmed for essentially the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED; ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE PRATT
(Sep 13, 2007)