Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.30 (1-a) for DNA testing since the defendant failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to him had the DNA test results been admitted into evidence at trial ( see CPL 440.30 [1-a]; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 961; People v Figueroa, 36 AD3d 458; People v Shenouda, 307 AD2d 938; People v Pugh, 288 AD2d 634; People v De Oliveira, 223 AD2d 766).