Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Pramod Kumar Patel v. Rakesh

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR

    [COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDERS] MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL Nos.1001 TO 1004, 1006 TO 1049 &

    1051 TO 1094 ON THE BOARD DATED 28-08-2024

    Dated: 28/08/2024

    The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office objection/default. In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion. In spite of repeated opportunity (three times–one under Rules, second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this order, SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time, failing which the concerned petition/ application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without further reference to the Court. Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s). In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

    If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

    S. No. Cases as per cause list No. Returnable Date

    1 1001 to 1004 & 1006 to 1020 14/10/2024

    2 1021 to 1040 15/10/2024

    3 1041 to 1049 & 1051 to 1060 16/10/2024

    4 1061 to 1080 17/10/2024

    5 1081 to 1094 18/10/2024

    (G.S. AHLUWALIA) JUDGE

      1. 2024-08-28T16:10:56+0530
      2. VARSHA CHOURASIYA

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Pramod Kumar Patel v. Rakesh
    (Aug 28, 2024)