1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R
DATED THIS THE 22NDDAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.975/2024 C/W.
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1714/2023 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.166/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.167/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.168/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.185/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.196/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.219/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.224/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.225/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.226/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.242/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.243/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.244/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.475/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.480/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.484/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.486/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.487/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.503/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.524/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.534/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.537/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.538/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.542/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.543/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.544/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.547/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.623/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.642/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.650/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.651/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.652/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.653/2024
1
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.654/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.655/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.660/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.663/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.664/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.665/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.697/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.701/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.702/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.705/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.757/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.759/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.760/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.762/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.763/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.767/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.768/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.769/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.770/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.780/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.782/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.786/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.791/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.793/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.798/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.849/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.851/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.855/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.872/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.877/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.898/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.900/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.959/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.961/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.962/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.963/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.964/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.965/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.966/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.967/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.968/2024
2
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.969/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.970/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.971/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.973/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.974/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.976/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.977/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.978/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.979/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.980/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1010/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1011/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1012/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1013/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1014/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1016/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1017/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1018/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1019/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1020/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1028/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1060/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1088/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1104/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1129/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1130/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1131/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1133/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1298/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1319/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1493/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1506/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1540/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1546/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1552/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1557/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1562/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1565/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1569/2024 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1570/2024
3
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.975/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARANTAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUIDLINGS
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1. B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR.
S/O LATE B R GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
2. Y M MUNIRAJU
S/O MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SANJAYANGAR SUB-DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 935, 64THCROSS
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU - 10.
3. H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WARD NO.100, SANJAYANAGARA
4
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER
K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. L-204, POORVANKARA
HEBBALA, KEMPAPURA
BENGALURU - 560024. 4 . M. NAGESH S/O MAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO. 3520/A, 7TH CROSS
GAYATHRINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 028.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B H THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO. 702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR
BENGALURU - 79.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M.MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA
2NDSTAGE, BENGALURU -40.
5
7 . M. BASAVARAJU S/O MUNISAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A.E./T.A. BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7; SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. H.SHANTI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R2 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE SPP FOR THE STATE PRAYING THAT
THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DTD 08.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.139/2020 ON
THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND
SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING
OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT,
BENGALURU CITY, BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1714/2023:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
INVESTIGATED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
CID BENGALURU
REP.STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 01. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
6
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWDB BBMP, 4TH BLOCK
SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGAR (EX EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION)
R/AT NO.5/15, 3RDMAIN ROAD BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560026
2 . B.R. OBAIAH
S/O B P ROSAIAH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
PANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEERING
SUB-DIVISION, PONNAMPET
NORTH COORG,
R/AT VINOBHA COLONY VILLAGE
SBRT COLONY POST, HUNASUR TALUK
MYSORE DISTRICT-571105.
3 . S R UDAYA SHANKAR
S/O LATE S N RAMACHANDRA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.80, 1ST MAIN ROAD CHAMRAJPET, BENGALURU-560018 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.236/2014 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
7
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.166/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
CID, BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D. NAGARAJ S/O DODDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.39, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA
HEREOHALLI POST, HEROHALLI
TUMAKURU-572127
2 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
AE/TA B.B.M.P WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT
CHIKKAKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560061
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE CITY, HASSAN DISTRICT
3 . ABDUL GAFOOR
S/O SHEIKH MISKIN
MAJOR IN AGE
JUNIOR ENGINEER, J.J. NAGARA
8
WARD GANDHINAGARA
SUB-DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.21-Q, 4TH STREET
2ND CROSS, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR R1 AND R3;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER-
STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED
IN SPL.C.C.NO.795/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.167/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
9
WARD NO.27,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560003.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO U/101,
3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS,
SWATHANTRANAGARA
SRIRAMPURA,
BENGALURU-577542.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA, B.B.M.P WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-01
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103.
4 . ABDUL GAFOOR,
S/O SHEIKH MISKIN,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
J.J.NAGARA WARD,
GANDHINAGARA,
SUB-DIVISION, B.B.M.P. R/AT NO 21-Q, 4TH STREET,
2ND CROSS, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
10
BHARATHI NAGARA,
BENGALURU-01 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R4; SRI VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3; R1 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER-
STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED
IN SPL.C.C.NO.729/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.168/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION (CID)
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
SWDB BBMP, 4TH BLOCK
CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
11
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGAR (EX. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION)
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026.
2 . R. BENAKESHA
S/O H. RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
JAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION, B.B.M.P. R/AT 17, SREE RAMA NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, KUVEMPU LAYOUT,
ANJANA NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560091.
3 . S.R. UDAYA SHANKAR
S/O LATE S.N. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO.80, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
CHAMARAJPET,
BENGALURU-560018 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER-
STATE PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE
PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED
IN SPL.C.C.NO.508/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT, BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
12
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.185/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION (CID)
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING.
BENGALURU 560001 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . ABDUL GAFOOR
S/O SHEIKH MISKIN,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
JUNIOR ENGINEER,
J.J.NAGARA WARD,
GANDHI NAGARA SUB-DIVISION,
B.B.M.P, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO 21-Q, 4TH STREET,
2ND CROSS, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560001.
2 . SRI. N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O NARAYANA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU-79.
3 . SRI M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT ENGINEER,
13
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS,
K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU,
FORMERLY ASSISTANT CONTROLLER
(FINANCE), BBMP, WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO 62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNYA LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYA NAGARA,
2ND STAGE, BENGALURU 40
4 . SRI M BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
TECHNICAL ADVISOR, B.B.M.P
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
PRESENTLY ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA DIVISION
B.B.M.P CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY, HASSAN DISTRICT.
5 . SRI D.A.ANWAR PASHA,
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
T.V.C.C. B.B.M.P, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD,
(PIPELINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT,
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANGARA,
BENGALURU-560040. … RESPONDENTS
14
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVAL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K.,ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 AND R5;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.252/2016, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.196/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . ABDUL GAFOOR
S/O SHEIKH MISKIN,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RTD. JUNIOR ENGINEER
J.J.NAGARA WARD, GANDHI NAGARA
SUB-DIVISION, BBMP, BENGALURU R/AT NO.21-Q, 4TH STREET
2ND CROSS THIMMAIAH ROAD
BHARATHI NAGARA
BENGALURU-560001.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALASHETTY,
15
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.U/101, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
6TH CROSS, SWATHANTHRAPALYA,
GANDHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-09.
3 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT OFFICER,
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS
K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU,
FORMERLY ASSISTANT CONTROLLER
(FINANCE), BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO 62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYA NAGARA,
2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-40.
4 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
TECHNICAL ADVISOR, BBMP,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
PRESENTLY ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE,
RAJARAJESHWARI, NAGARA DIVISION,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKAKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKRE CITY
HASSAN DISTRICT.
16
5 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R.AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS,
TVCC BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.27, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
PIPELINE ROAD, R P C LAYOUT,
2ND STAGE, VIJAYA NAGARA,
BENGALURU.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 AND R5;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.253/2016 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.219/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
17
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
MAJOR IN AGE,
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
(EX. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION,
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU -560026
2 . S.R. RAVISHANKAR
S/O LATE S.N. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
CLASS- I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO 80, 1ST MAIN ROAD ,
CHAMARAJPET,
BENGALURU - 560018 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.664/2017 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER SECTIONS 120B,
409, 415, 418, 477 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 13(1)(c)(d) AND
13(2) OF THE P.C. ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.224/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION (CID), BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
18
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
SWDB, BBMP CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGAR (FORMER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER),
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
RTD. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT 405, 11TH CROSS,
14TH MAIN ROAD,
J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE,
BENGALURU-560078.
3 . CHINNAMAREGOWDA
S/O EREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB-DIVISION,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION,
BBMP AT PRESENT ASST. ENGINEER,
PWD DEPARTMENT, MANDYA.
R/AT NO 64, VENKATALINGAIAH LAYOUT,
BANNUR ROAD, MYSURU.
19
4 . SHASHINAYAK
S/O LATE DHANAJAYA NAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
VIKASH ENTERPRISES,
CIVIL CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO 2, BASAPPA EXTENSION,
PATTANAGERE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA
BENGALURU-560098
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR
R1, R3 AND R4;
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.557/2024 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.225/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA,
20
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
SWDB, BBMP, 4TH BLOCK,
SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGAR (EX. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION)
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT 405, 11TH CROSS,
14TH MAIN ROAD,
J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE,
BENGALURU-560078.
3 . S.B. SOMESH
S/O BYREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB-DIVISION,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION, BBMP,
PRESENTLY ZONAL OFFICER,
DEVELOPMENT OFFICER-3,
KIADB, MAHARSHI ANANDABHAVANA,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560098 R/AT NO.185, 9TH CROSS,
PARK AND PLAY GROUND, IDIAL HOME,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA
BENGALURU-560098.
4 . N. MURALIDHAR
S/O LATE M. NARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO 31, 4TH CROSS,
7TH BLOCK JAYANAGARA,
21
BENGALURU 82,
PERMANENT VILLAGE: BENGALURU
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3; SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C BY PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER
DATED 20.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.476/2014 ON THE
FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.226/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
INVESTIGATED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
SWDB, BBMP, 4TH BLOCK
SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGAR (EX. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION)
22
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026.
2 . R. BENAKESH
S/O H. RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
JAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BBMP R/AT NO.17, SRIRAMA NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, KUVEMPU LAYOUT,
ANJANA NAGAR, BENGALURU-91.
3 . S.R. RAVISHANKAR
S/O LATE S.M. RAMACHANDRA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO 80, 1ST MAIN ROAD, CHAMRAJPET, BENGALURU-560018. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.477/2014 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.242/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION (CID), BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
23
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RTD. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
SWDB, BBMP, 4TH BLOCK
SHOPPING COMPLEX, JAYANAGAR
(EX. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION)
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BANGALORE-560026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANAND
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
RTD. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT 405, 11TH CROSS, 14TH MAIN ROAD,
J.P. NAGAR 2ND PHASE,
BENGALURU-560078.
3 . B.S.ANIL
S/O B.K. SOMASHEKAR,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
R/AT NO.1, 6TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA
MYSURU ROAD, BENGALURU-560026. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SWAROOP ANAND R., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
24
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.556/2014 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU BY ALLOWING
THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.243/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING.
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
WARD NO.27, GANDHINAGAR
SUB-DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560003.
2 . D. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE DODDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
25
R/AT 40/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 4THCROSS,
OPP. TO ANGANAWADI WEST DIVISION,
B.K.NAGARA, BENGALURU-560022.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
AE/TA, B.B.M.P. WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560061
ALSO AT: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY, HASSAN DISTRICT.
4 . ABDUL GAFOOR
S/O SHEIKH MISKIN,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
J.J. NAGARA WARD,
GANDHI NAGARA
SUB-DIVISION, B.B.M.P.
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.21-Q, 4TH STREET,
2ND CROSS, THIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560001. … RESPONDENTS
(R1 TO R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 17.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.727/2018 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU BY ALLOWING
THIS CRL.RP.
26
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.244/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H R AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD,
(PIPE LINE ROAD), RPC LAYOUT,
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560040.
2 . K.B. JAYANNA GOWDA
S/O LATE BELURE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
KENGERI SUB-DIVISION,
R.R. NAGARA ZONE, BBMP,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO 558,
RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD,
HAMPINAGARA,
VIJAYANAGARA II STAGE,
BENGALURU- 104.
27
3 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR,
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO.204,
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO 1,
2ND FLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-01.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D M MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
CHIEF CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.),
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP, WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO 62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNYA LAYOUT,
3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA, 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
AE/TA B.B.M.P WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-560090
R/AT NO 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573201.
6 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B R GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED),
MALLESWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU-560090.
28
R/AT NO.137, 10THMAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT CHANRALAYOUT
BENGALURU-40.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.274/2016 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU BY ALLOWING
THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.475/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O. LATE H. NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
(PRESENTLY RETIRED),
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU-560 009.
29
R/AT NO. 1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560 075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O. LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 003.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O. LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT FLAT NO. 204,
2ND FLOOR, AHUJA CHAMBERS,
NO.1, KUMARA KRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 051.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP,
BENGALURU,
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU-560 015. R/AT NO. 702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
30
BASAVESHWARANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 079.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D. M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RDSTAGE,
ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE,
BENGALURU-560 040.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.VIJAY V. BAJENDRI, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 TO R6; SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.521/2018 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU BY
ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
31
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.480/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
(PRESENTLY RETIRED)
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU - 560009. R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 560003.
32
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . N SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU - 560079.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B H THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
BASAVESHWARANGARA,
BENGALURU - 79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 40.
33
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 572116. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 TO R6; SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.422/2018, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.484/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGLAURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
34
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWD, BBMP, CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4THBLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGARA, (THE THEN EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION,
BENGALURU-560 098
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560 026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT NO.405, 11THCROSS,
14THMAIN ROAD,
J.P.NAGAR, II PHASE,
BENGALURU-560 078.
3 . B.P. PRAMESH
S/O B.K.PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
OCC: ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
R.R. NAGAR, SUB-DIVISION,
R.R. NAGARA DIVISION, BBMP,
NOW AT LAND ARMY DIVISION
JUNIOR ENGINEER,
NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM,
RAJABHAVANA ROAD, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.3009, 13THMAINT ROAD,
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 040
NATIVE PLACE BOODANURU GRAMA
KERALAPURA, ARKALGUD TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
35
4 . B.S.ANIL S/O B.K.SOMASHEKAR,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.1, 6TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA
MYSURU RAOD, BENGALURU-26. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. R.SWAROOP ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3-SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.411/2014, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.486/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R.AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
36
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS, TVCC, BBMP
BENGALURU - 560001
R/AT NO.27, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
PIPE LINE ROAD, R P C LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560104.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU- 560003
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR - 563101.
3 . R. CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR,
R/AT AHUJA CHAMBERS
NO.204, 2ND FLOOR,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M.MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT OFFICER
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS
K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU
FORMERLY ASSISTANT CONTROLLER
(FINANCE) BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
37
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYA NAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BANGALORE - 40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
A E /T A BBMP, WEST ZONE, BENGALURU - 560015 R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3; SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 AND R5)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.09.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.124/2021 ON THE FILE OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING
OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT,
BENGALURU BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.487/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
38
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . ABDUL GAFOOR
S/O SHEIK MISKIN,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
JR. ENGINEER, J.J. NAGAR WARD,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU.
R/AT HOUSE NO.21-Q,
4TH STREET, 2ND CROSS,
TIMMAIAH ROAD,
BHARATHI NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560049.
2 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU-560079.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
39
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-572116 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.124/2021 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU BY ALLOWING
THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.503/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGLAURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWD, BBMP CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4THBLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX,
JAYANAGARA, (THE THEN EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
40
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560 026.
2 . L.K.SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT NO.405, 11THCROSS,
14THMAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR, II PHASE,
BENGALURU - 560 078.
3 . B.P. PRAMESH
S/O B.K.PUTTEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
OCC: ASSISTANT ENGINEER ,
R.R.NAGAR, SUB-DIVISION,
R.R.NAGARA DIVISION, BBMP,
NOW AT LAND ARMY DIVISION
JUNIOR ENGINEER,
NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
RAJABHAVANA ROAD, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.3009, 13THMAINT ROAD,
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 040
NATIVE PLACE BOODANURU GRAMA
KERALAPURA, ARKALGUD TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 102.
4 . C. KARIGOWDA
S/O CHIKKABOREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
CLASS-1 (A) CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO.46, VENKATALINGAIAH LAYOUT
OPP. MYSURU MILK DIARY,
SIDDHARTH LAYOUT, MYSURU-570011 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. P.M.SIDDAMALLAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
41
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 21.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.555/2014 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.524/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D. POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O. LATE B.R.GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED),
MALLESWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU-560001. R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
B.C.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . T.N.BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD),
42
YESHWANTHPURA, SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.154, 4TH CROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8THSTAGE, J.P.NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 076.
3 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
4 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O. LATE NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU-560 079.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU,
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 079.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D. M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
43
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.),
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3, R4 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER
PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.135/2020, ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CLITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
44
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.534/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITIAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D, BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
(PRESENTLY RETIRED) ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE,
ENGINEER, GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO. 13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-03
NATIVE: SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR-563101.
45
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU-560079.
4 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.418/2018 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGLAURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.537/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
46
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . G.R. KUMAR
S/O. G. H. RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
WARD NO. 1,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 7, 4TH CROSS,
BRUNDAVANA NAGARA,
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O. LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR,
OFFICE ADDRESS NO.204,
AHUJA CHAMBERS,
NO.1, 2ND FLOOR,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
47
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W 401 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.138/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL. JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT
AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.538/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D. POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O. LATE B. R. GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED),
MALLESWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
48
B.C.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD),
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.154, 4TH CROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE,
J. P. NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 076.
3 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
4 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O. BALASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.U/101, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
6TH CROSS, SWATHANTRANAGARA,
SRIRAMAPURA, BENGALURU-570008.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU,
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
49
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 079.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.),
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-560 040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3, R4 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W 401 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.34/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT
BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
50
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.542/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION,
GANGHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU-560009
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP,BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BEGALURU-560003
51
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN-563101.
3 . B.N. VISHWANATH
S/O LATE B S NAGARAJ,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.J.123, 3RD CROSS,
PIPE LINE ROAD,
D.T. ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM
BENGALURU-560020.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B H THAMMAIHA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OT THE BBMP BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO. 702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D M MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-40.
52
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R6;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R5; R2 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W 401 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.618/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL. JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT
AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.543/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
53
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B R GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER(RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE BENGALURU
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560040.
2 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMME GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
WARD NO.100, SANJAYNAGAR,
MATHIKERE SUB DIVISION,
MALLEHSWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
K.R CIRCLE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANKAR,
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA,
BENGLAURU-560024.
3 . M.S. VENKATESH
S/O MARAPPA NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
CIVIL CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.163, 5TH CROSS,
2ND MAIN PRAKASH NAGAR,
BENGALURU-21.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R2; R3 - SERVED)
54
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W 401 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.338/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT
BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.544/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
BBMP HEAD OFFICE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560086.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR,
OFFICE ADDRESS NO.204
AHUJA CHAMBER, 2ND FLOOR, NO.1
55
KUMARA KRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001. R/AT NO.126, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
IN BETWEEN 12 AND 13TH CROSS,
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-03.
3 . K. MURULASIDDAPPA
S/O KARINAYAK,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
JUNIOR ENGINEER,
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT,
CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
PRESENTLY PLANNING DIVISION,
DAASRAHALLI, BENGALURU-560057. R/AT NO.8, 2ND CROSS,KUVEMPUNAGARA, T DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU-03. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397
R/W 401 OF CR.PC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.136/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT
BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.547/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D. POLICE, BENGALURU,
METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE, BENGALURU,
56
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRL OFFICE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . D. NAGARAJ
S/O. LATE DODDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.39, KIADB, INDUSTRIAL AREA,
HEREHALLI POST, HEREHALLI,
TUMKUR-570001.
3 . K. MARALUSIDDAPPA
S/O. KARINAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
JUNIOR ENGINEER,
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT,
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
PROJECT DIVISION,
DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.8, 2ND CROSS,
KUVEMPUNAGARA, T. DASARAHALLI,
BENGALURU-560 003.
… RESPONDENTS
57
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.122/2021 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.623/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE P
OLICE STATION, C.I.D, BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.1282 ,
1ST CROSS, BEML ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU -560075
58
2 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ASST ENGINEER GANDHI
NAGAR SUB-DIVISION
GANDHI NAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM BENGALURU
NATIVE: JADAGANAPURA
MALAVLALI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT - 571430 3 . CHANDRU @ R. CHANDRAPPA S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT FLAT NO.204,
2ND FLOOR,
AHUJA CHAMBERS NO.01,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 51.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M.MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
59
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E /TA BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
3 CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103
7 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B R GOPAL
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
BCC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU - 40
8 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/ O LATE MASTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
ASST EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD)
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION
WEST ZONE BENGALURU
R/AT NO,154, 4TH CROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE
J.P.NAGARA, BENGALURU - 76 … RESPONDENTS
60
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R8; SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7; R1 AND R2 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.730/2018, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.642/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560026.
2 . MADHUKAR
S/O SHIVARAMEGOWDA
61
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.23, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
2ND STAGE WEST OF CHORD ROAD
RAJAJIANGAR, BENGALURU-86 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. LOKESHA M.Y., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.665/2017 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADLD. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.650/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
(PRESENTLY RETIRED)
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
62
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU-560 009
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560 075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU-560 003
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATEEXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.U/101
3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS
SWARATHANTRA NAGARA
SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU-560 021.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
63
BASAVESHWARANAGAR
BENGALURU-79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103.
7 . D.A ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H R AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT BI,27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD,
(PIPE LINE ROAD) R.P.C LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-40.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R7; SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6; R1 AND R2 - SERVED)
64
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.29/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.651/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560086. 2 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O LATE RAMAPPA,
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR,
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO.204
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1,
65
2ND FLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-01
R/AT NO.126, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
IN BETWEEN 12TH AND 13TH CROSS,
MALLESHWARM, BENGALURU-03.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA, BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-01
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU-61
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.855/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.652/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATIN, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
66
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . R. CHANDRAPPA
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
1STGRADE CONTRACTOR
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO.24,
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1,
2ND FLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU 01.
2 . M. BAAVARAJU S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGLAURU R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.860/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
67
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.653/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGLAURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH CORT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
(PRESENTLY RETIRED)
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN RAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-75.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU-03
68
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGAR,
KAMAKSHIPALYA
BENGALURU-79.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B H THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR
BENGALURU-79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT,
3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
69
A E/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6
SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1202/2019, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE AND TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.654/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, CID BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
70
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.39, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD.)
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.154, 4TH CROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE,
J.P.NAGARA, BENGALURU - 76.
3 . G.R. KUMAR
S/O G.H. RAMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WARD NO.01, MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.7, 4THCROSS,
BRUNDAVANA NAGARA,
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU - 86.
4 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
71
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA,
KAMASHIPALYA,
BENGALURU - 79.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU - 79.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD.)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE
BENGALURU - 40.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
72
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VIJAYAKUMAR V.B, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5, R6 AND R7;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.32/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.655/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN, TASK FORCE,
BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560086.
73
2 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGAR,
KAMKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU-79.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-01
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
ALSO AT BEHIND MINIVIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.456/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.660/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, CID, BENGALURU,
74
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
(PRESENTLY RETIRED)
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU -560009
R/AT NO.1282 , 1ST CROSS,
BEML ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU -560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 560003
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR
75
R/AT NO.204,
AHUJA CHAMBERS NO.01,
2ND FLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560001
R/AT NO.126, 6TH MAIN ROAD,
IN BETWEEN 12 AND 13TH CROSS,
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 03
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D M MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD.)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E /TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103.
6 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU
76
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD,
PIPE LINE ROAD, R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU - 40.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 AND R5; SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.28/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY B
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.663/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, CID, BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
77
GANDHINAGAR, BBMP,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.12, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALUR-03
NATIVE SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR-563101.
2 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA
BENGALURU-560079.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLANSANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-572116.
4 . HARISH KUMAR D.,
S/O LATE DASAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER
COTTONPET, WARD NO.120,
R/AT NO.09, 2ND CROSS,
RAMAKRISHNA STREET
SHESHADRIPURAM
BENGALURU -572116
78
AND ALSO AT SATHANURU
MANDYA-571401
5 . M.K. MANJAIAH
S/O KARIGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM SUB-DIVISION BANGALORE -560003
R/AT NO.58, JNANAJYOTHI NAGAR BANGALORE-560056.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI. AJAY S., ADVOCATE FOR R4;
SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.728/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.664/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, CID, BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
79
AND:
1 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER,
GANDHI NAGAR SUB-DIVISION
GANDHI NAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
WEST OF CHORD ROAD
BENGALURU -560086.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.U/101,
3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS,
SWATHANTRANAGARA,
SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU - 560021
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E /TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
80
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.30/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.665/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU,
ALSO JADAGANAPURA
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430. 2 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ R. CHANDRU S/O RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
81
PROP: M/S. ISHWARYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS
R/AT FLAT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR
AHUJA CHAMBERS NO.1
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-01 (CONTRACTOR)
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
TECHNICAL ADVISER
BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
PRESENTLY ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
ROAD & CIVIC AMENITIES
R.R.NAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGALURU-560098. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.527/2018, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.697/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D POLICE, BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, BENGALURU
82
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
WARD NO.100, SANJAYANAGAR,
MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
K.R. CIRLCE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANAKAR,
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA,
BENGALURU-560024.
2 . M. NAGESH
S/O MAYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.3520/A,
7TH CROSS,
GAYATHRI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560010.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA, BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-01
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
83
ALSO AT BEHIND
MINIVIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.858/2019 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU BY
ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.701/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATIN, C.I.D BENGAURU
REP. BY STATE PUBIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISON
BBMP, BENGALURU.
84
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS,
MAHALASKHIMPURAM,
BENGALURU
NATIVE: JADAGANAPURA
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
2 . CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT FLAT NO.204, 2NDFLOOR, BENGALURU-51.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT, 3
CHIKKALLANSANDRA,
BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103.
4 . T.N.BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD.)
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.154, 4THCROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8THSTAGE
J.P.NAGARA, BENGALURU-76. … RESPONDENTS
85
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R4; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.731/2018 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.702/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D. POLICE,
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O. LATE B.R.GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED),
MALLESWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
B.C.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
86
2 . T.N.BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD.),
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.154, 4TH CROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE,
J.P.NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 076.
3 . G.R.KUMAR
S/O. G.H.RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
WARD NO.1,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.7, 4TH CROSS,
BRUNDAVANA NAGARA,
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-86.
4 . M.S. VENKATESH
S/O. MARAPPA NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
CIVIL CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.163, 5TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN,
PRAKASH NAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 021. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
SMT. HEMALATHA S., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.339/2018 ON THE FILE OF
87
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.705/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 19TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALAESHWARAM, BENGALURU-03
PERMANENT ADDRES:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN.
2 . D. NAGARAJ
S/O LATE DODDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.39, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA TUMKUR-572104.
88
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLAANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.31/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.757/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D, BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
89
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560086.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
PROP: M/S ISHWARAYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS, AHUJA CHAMBER,
FLAT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR,
NO.01, KUMARA PARK ROAD,
BENGALURU-560001.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-61
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-573125 … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
90
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.116/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.759/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O. LATE H.NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560 075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O. LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
91
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 003.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O. BALASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO. U/101, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
6TH CROSS, SWATHANTRANAGARA,
SRIRAMAPURA, BENGALURU-560 021.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU,
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU,
92
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3; R2 - SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.144/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENECS UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.760/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
93
WARD NO.100, SANJAYANAGARA,
MATTIKERE SUB DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU -03.
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANKAR,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560024.
2 . M. NAGESH
S/O MAYANNA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.3520/A,
7TH CROSS, GAYATHRI NAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560021.
3 . M BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247,
3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 61,
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573125.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE CITY, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
94
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.569/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BE
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.762/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA,
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOMMAPALLI, CHINTHAMANI TALUK,
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
2 . N. MURALIDHAR S/O LATE M.NARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
CLASS-I, CONTRACTOR,
95
R/AT NO.31, 4TH CROSS,
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 82.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI.PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.167/2017 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C
ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.763/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
(PRESENTLY RETIRED)
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU.
96
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO 13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560003
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.129, 5THCROSS
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA
BENGALURU-79.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT 3RD STAGE,
ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU-40.
97
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,.
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT
6 . D.A.ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R.AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.27, 1STB MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD) RPC LAYOUT
2NDSTAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-40
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCAE FOR R2;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R6;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.140/2020 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C
ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
98
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.767/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU - 560086.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALA SHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.U-101,
3RD MAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS,
SWARATHANTRA NAGARA,
SRIRAMPURA,
BENGALURU - 560021.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
99
A E / T A, BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU - 61,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573125. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.572/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.768/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
100
AND:
1 . H.P. RAMESH,
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
WARD NO.100,
SANJAYANAGARA,
MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU - 03
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE,
K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANKAR,
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560024.
2 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
A E / T A, BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 61
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573125. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.570/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
101
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.769/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA,
S/O CHANNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESWARINAGAR DIVISION,
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU - 560026. 2 . B.R. OBAIAH, S/O ROSAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
PANCHAYATH RAJ ENGINEERING
SUB-DIVISION, PONNAM PET,
DAKSHINA KODAGU,
R/AT VINOBHA COLONY VILLAGE,
C.B.T. COLONY POST,
HUNUSURU TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT,
102
ALSO AT: VINOBHA COLONY VILLAGE,
C.B.T. COLONY, HUNUSURU.
3 . C. LOKESH,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO. 72, 5TH E MAIN,
BHOVI COLONY,
2ND STAGE, 3RD BLOCK,
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU - 79. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.525/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.770/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
103
AND:
1 . H.N.PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H.NANJEGOWDA,
AGED MAJOR
RTD. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU - 560075.
2 . M. PRABHU,
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR, SUB-DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 03
NATIVE: SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU - 79.
4 . B.T.RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
104
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9THMAIN ROAD
3RDBLOCK, 3RDSTAGE
BASAVESHWARA NAGAR
BENGALURU-79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ,
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
7 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA,
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD,
(PIPE LINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT,
105
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 40.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R7; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6;
SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.137/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.780/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
106
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD,
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560040.
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD)
MATTIKERE SUB DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO 64TH CROSS,
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGARA
BENGALURU-10.
3 . M.K. HARISH
S/O M. KODANDARAMA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WARD NO.36, MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
4 . C. KARIGOWDA
S/O CHIKKABOREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
CLASS-I(A) CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO 46, VENKATALINGHA,
LAYOUT, OPPOSITE TO MYSURU MILK DIARY
SIDDARTHA LAYOUT
MYSURU-11.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
SRI. M.PARTHA, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.107/2018 ON THE FILE OF
107
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGLAURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.782/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . G.R. KUMAR
S/O. G.H. RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
WARD NO.1,MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO.7, 4TH CROSS,
BRUNDAVANA NAGAR,
MATHIKERE,
BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . M. MANJUNATH
S/O. LATE MUDDURNALLAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.58/B, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-10.
108
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU,
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI.VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.800/2020 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C.
ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THE RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.786/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALUUR METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE,
POLICE STATIN, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
109
AND:
1 . G.L.KESHAVA MURTHY
S/O LANKAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
WARD NO.99, MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM, BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.345, 10THCROSS,
SARASWATHPURAM,
NANDINI LAYOUT,
BENGALURU-96.
2 . C.K. ANAND
S/O KEMPAIAH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.64/E, 14THMAIN
VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-40
ALSO AT 10THCROSS,
GUTTALU COLONY, MANDYA.
3 . M. BASAVARJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M.GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
110
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.791/2020 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.791/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORC POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B. G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O. LATE B. R. GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD.,)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 139, 10THMAIN ROAD,
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . T. N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD),
111
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 154, 4THCROSS,
SAI ENCLAVE, 8THSTAGE,
J. P. NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 076.
3 . N. S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 566, 4THCROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
4 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O. BALASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO. U/101,
3RDMAIN ROAD, 6THCROSS
SWATHANTRANAGARA,
SRIRAMPURA,
BENGALURU-560 021.
5 . B. T. RAMESH
S/O.LATE B. H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP
BENGALURU,
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 702, 9THMAIN ROAD,
3RDBLOCK, 3RDSTAGE,
BASAVESHWARA NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 079.
112
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D. M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD.,),
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 62, 2NDMAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RDSTAGE,
CHIKKALLANSANDRA,
BENGALURU, ATTIGUPPE,
VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE,
BENGALURU-560 040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE BENGALURU-573 103 R/AT NO. 247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 AND R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.33/2020 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
113
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.793/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D. A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O. LATE H.R.AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO. 27, 1STB MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD), RPC LAYOUT
2NDSTAGE, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . M. PRABHI
S/O. LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASST. ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION,
R/AT NO. 19, 11THCROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 003,
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION,
KOLAR TOWN.
114
3 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O. LATE RAMAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
1STGRADE CONTRACTOR,
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO. 204,
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1, 2NDFLOOR,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001, R/AT NO.126, 6THMAIN ROAD,
IN BETWEEN 12THAND 13THCROSS,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU-560 003. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3;
R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.856/2019 ON THE FILE OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.798/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D. BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
115
AND:
1 . H. N. PRABHAKAR
S/O. LATE H. NANJEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION,
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 1282, 1STCROSS,
BEML MAIN ROAD,
NEW THIPPASANDRA,
BENGALURU-560 075.
2 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O. SIDDEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 1238, 11THMAIN,
12THCROSS, MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 003.
3 . R. CHANDRU
S/O. RAMAPPA, PROPRIETOR M/S. AISHWARYA
INFRASTRUCTURES AND DEVELOPERS,
AHUJA CHAMBERS, FLAT NO. 204,
2NDFLOOR, NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 051.
4 . B. T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B. H. THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP,
BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER,
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 702, 9THMAIN ROAD,
116
3RDBLOCK, 3RDSTAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 079.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D. M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNANT (RTD.),
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 62, 2NDMAIN ROAD,
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RDSTAGE,
ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE,
BENGALURU-560 040.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 247, 3RDMAIN ROAD,
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
7 . D. A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O. LATE H. R. AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT NO. 27, 1STB MAIN ROAD,
(PIPE LINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT,
2NDSTAGE, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 040. … RESPONDENTS
117
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R7
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.141/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.849/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/.W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C.R.MAHESH KUMAR,
S/O. RANGEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.1431, 2NDMAIN ROAD
CHANDRA LAYOUT
BENGALURU -560 040.
118
2 . D. NAGARAJ,
S/O. LATE DODDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.39
KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA
HEREHALLI POST
HEREHALLI, TUMKUR-572 104.
3 . K. MARALUSIDDAPPA,
S/O.KARINAIKA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
PRESENTLY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PROJECT DIVISION,
DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.8, 2NDCROSS,
KUVEMPUNAGAR, T.DASARAHALLI
BENGALURU-560 057.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. C.R. GOPALASWAMY, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.793/2020 ON THE FILE OF
THE COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
119
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.851/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU -560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S.REVANNA
S/O.SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4THCROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ,
S/O. BALASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.U/101
3RDMAIN ROAD, 6THCROSS
SWARATHANTRA NAGARA
SRIRAMPURA, BENGALURU-560 021.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
120
AE/TA, BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560 061.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 125. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.455/2019, ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.855/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
121
AND:
1 . N.S.REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4THCROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU-560 086. 2 . R.CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU, S/O. LATE RAMAPPA
AGE : MAJOR
1STGRADE CONTRACTOR
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO.204
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1
2NDFLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560 001. R/AT NO.126, 6THMAIN ROAD,
IN BETWEEN 12THAND 13THCROSS,
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU-560 031.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA, BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU-61
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 125. … RESPONDENTS
122
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.857/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.872/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . G.R.KUMAR
S/O.G.H.RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, BDA
R/AT NO.54, 6THCROSS
BRUNDAVANA NAGARA
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU -560 054. 2 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU, S/O. LATE RAMAPPA
AGE : MAJOR
123
1STGRADE CONTRACTOR
OFFICE SITUATED AT FLAT NO.204
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1
2NDFLOOR, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001. R/AT NO.126, 6THMAIN ROAD
IN BETWEEN 12THAND 13THCROSS
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU-560 003.
3 . K. MARALUSIDDAPPA,
S/O. KARINAIKA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER/TECHNICAL ASSISTANT O/O.THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
PRESENTLY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PROJECT DIVISION, DASARAHALLI
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.8, 2NDCROSS
KUVEMPUNAGARA
T.DASARAHALLI
BENGALURU - 560 057. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.859/2019 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
124
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.877/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . G.L.KESHAVA MURTHY
S/O. LANKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER, WARD NO.99
MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.345, 10THCROSS
SARASWATHIPURA
NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU-560 096.
2 . K.C. CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O. LATE CHIKKAPUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
R/AT NO.64/E, GROUND FLOOR 14THCROSS/MAIN, VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 040
ALSO AT KT-814, 8THCROSS
CHAMUNDESHWARINAGAR
BENGALURU-571 401.
125
3 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.10.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.792/2020 ON THE FILE OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY
CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR
TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION
ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.898/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
126
AND:
1. N.S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4THCROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O. NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5THCROSS,
PUSHPAVATHINAGAR,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BENGALURU-560 079.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER/
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 247, 3RDMAIN ROAD,
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLANSANDRA, BENGALURU,
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
127
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.571/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND
THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.900/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . G.R. KUMAR
S/O. G.H.RAMEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, WARD NO.1,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.7, 4THCROSS,
BRUNDAVANA NAGAR,
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560 086.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O. RAMAPPA,
AGED MAJOR,
PROPRIETOR-M/S. ISHWARYA
128
INFRASTRUCTURES AND DEVELOPERS,
AHUJA CHAMBERS,
FLAT NO.204, 2NDFLOOR,
NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE.
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD,
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
ALSO AT: BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2;
SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.88/2022 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLWOING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.959/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
129
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O. CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION,
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560 026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOMMANAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 101.
2 . L.K.SHIVANAND
S/O. KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R/AT NO.405, 11THCROSS
14THMAIN ROAD
J.P. NAGAR, II PHASE,
BENGALURU-560 078.
3 . CHENNAMAREGOWDA
S/O. EREGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB DIVISION,
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION, BBMP,
R/AT: 404, BASAPPA LAYOUT,
BHEL LAYOUT, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE
130
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA
BENGALURU-560 098.
4 . S.M.RAJU
S/O. MARIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT: NO 59, 5THMAIN ROAD,
11THCROSS, NGEF LAYOUT,
NAGARABHAVI
BENGALURU-560 072. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR
R1, R3 & R4;
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.336/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PC ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY, BY ALLOWING THIS CRL.RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.961/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
131
AND:
1 . M. PRABHU,
S/O. LATE B. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER,
R/AT NO.13, 9THCROSS,
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT,
MALLESHWARAM,
BENGALURU - 560 003.
NATIVE: SANTHE GATE
EXTENSION, KOLAR TOWN
KOLAR - 563 101. 2 . R. CHANDRAPPA @ CHANDRU S/O. RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
PROP: M/S. ISHWARYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS
R/AT FLAT NO.204,
2NDFLOOR, AHUJA CHAMBERS
NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 01.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE,
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD,
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA,
BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 103. … RESPONDENTS
132
(BY SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. VIJAY KUMAR V.B., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 20.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.617/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PC ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.962/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C.I.D. POLICE (BMTF),
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O. CHENNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION,
R/AT: NO.5/15, 2NDMAIN ROAD,
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560 026
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOMMANAPALLI,
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125.
133
2 . L.K. SHIVANAND
S/O. KEMPEGOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
R.R.NAGAR SUB DIVISION AND DIVISION,
BBMP, BENGALURU,
R/AT: NO.405, 11THCROSS,
14THMAIN ROAD, J.P. NAGAR,
2NDPHASE, BENGALURU-560 078.
3 . K. M. KUMARASWAMY
S/O. MARANNA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YERARS,
JUNIOR ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR SUB DIVISION
R/AT NO.375, 4THMAIN ROAD, 6TH'B' CROSS, AROGYA LAYOUT,
ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 091
NATIVE PLACE:
KARIOBANAHALLI,
HERIYURU TALUK,
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 501.
4 . N. MURALIDHAR
S/O. LATE M. NARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR, R/AT NO.31, 4THCROSS,
7THBLOCK, JAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 082
NATIVE PLACE BENGALURU.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3;
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
134
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.437/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PC ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.963/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU,
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O. LATE B.R.GOPAL GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.139, 10THMAIN ROAD,
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD.)
YESHWANTHPURA SUB DIVISION,
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION,
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
135
3 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O. SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, BBMP
CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.566, 4THCROSS,
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560 086.
4 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O. NARAYANASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
CONTRACTOR,
R/AT NO.129, 5THCROSS,
PUSHPAVATHI NAGAR,
KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER,
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY: CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE,
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9THMAIN ROAD,
3RDBLOCK, 3RDSTAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BENGALURU-560 079.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O. LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD.),
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER,
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O. MUNISWAMY,
136
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD,
1STCROSS, B H C S LAYOUT,
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
ARASIKERE TOWN,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5, R6 & R7;
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1330/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.964/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
137
AND:
1 . C. NARAYAN
S/O. CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
FORMERLY AT RAJARAJESWARI NAGAR
DIVISION, R/AT NO. 5/15
2NDMAIN ROAD, BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560 026.
2 . RAMACHANDRAIAH
S/O. BETTATHIMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.93, 3RDCROSS,
HOYSALA MAIN ROAD,
SUNKADAKATTE,
BENGALURU - 560 091. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.103/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.965/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION,
C.I.D., BENGALURU,
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
138
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560 001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O. LATE H.R. AMEER JAN,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
T.V.C.C. BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST'B' MAIN ROAD,
(PIPE LINE ROAD)
R.P.C. LAYOUT, 2NDSTAGE,
VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O. RAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
AHUJA CHAMBERS,
FLAT NO.204, 2NDFLOOR
NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD,
BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 20.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.86/2022 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
139
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.966/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SWD
BBMP, CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGARA (FORMER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560 026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT NO.405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGARA
II PHASE, BENGALURU 560078.
140
3 . B.P. PARAMESH
S/O B.K. PUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION
BBMP.
PRESENTLY BHOO SENE VIBHAGA
JUNIOR ENGINEER, NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
RAJABHAVANA ROAD, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.3009, 13TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU 560 040.
PERMANENT ADDRESS: BOODANURU GRAMA
KERALAPURA, ARAKALGUDU TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573102.
4 . S.D. SHASHIKUMAR
S/O DEVEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
45/E, 14TH MAIN ROAD
VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560 040. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3
SRI. R. SWAROOP ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR
DRI. D.C. DEEPAK, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.109/2015 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
141
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.967/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, CID BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560001.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP HEAD OFFICE,
BENGALURU 560055.
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU 560086.
2 . B. BASAVARAJU
S/O LATE BALASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
CONTRACTOR.
R/AT NO.U 101,
2ND MAIN ROAD
6TH CROSS, SWATHANTRANAGARA
SRIRAMAPURA, BENGALURU 21.
3 . K.L. MARULASIDDAPPA
S/O KARINAYAK
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
142
JUNIOR ENGINEER TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
CHIEF ENGINEER, BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
PRESENTLY: PLANNING DIVISION
DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.8, 2ND CROSS
KUVEMPUNAGAR,
T. DASARAHALLI
BENGALURU 560057.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 08.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.335/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.968/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION,
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
143
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/A, NO.556, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM,
BENGALURU-560086.
2 . R. CHANDRU
S/O RAMAPPA AHUJA CHAMBER, FLAT No.204
2ND FLOOR, KUMARA KRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU 560001.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1200/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
144
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.969/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU -560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WARD NO.27 GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
145
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION, KOLAR TOWN.
3 . R. CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR, 1ST GRADE CONTRACTOR
OFFICE ADDRESS NO.204
2ND FLOOR, NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU-51.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573503.
6 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
146
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TVCC.
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO 27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURUS 560040.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M. ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY M, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R6
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.142/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.970/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU- 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
147
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWD, BBMP CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGAR (THE THEN EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA,
BENGALURU-560026.
2 . M.J. KUMAR
S/O JAWAREGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER, LAGGERE SUB DIVISION
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION
BBMP.
R/AT NO.738, 13TH MAIN ROAD
HBCS, ITI LAYOUT, II STAGE
NAGARBHAVI, BENGALURU-40.
3 . M.S. RAJU
S/O MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
VOKKALIGARU, CLASS-I CONTRACTOR
NO.159, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 11TH CROSS
NGEF LAYOUT, NAGARBHAVI,
BENGALURU-72.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3
SRI. MADHUKAR S, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.794/2020 ON THE FILE OF
148
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.971/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC, BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . M. PRABHU,
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003.
149
PERMANENT ADDRESS: SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR-563101.
3 . CHANDRU R
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560 040.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BACK TO MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5
SRI. ANITHA N, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
150
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1334/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.973/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.N. KANAKADAS
S/O LATE H.D. NARASAIAH
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION
R/AT NO.883, 2ND CROSS
1ST MAIN, BEML LAYOUT, 5TH STAGE
2ND PHASE, RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU-560098.
2 . M.B. NAGARAJ
S/O BORALINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA SUB DIVISION
R.R.NAGAR DIVISION, BBMP
R.R. NAGAR, BENGALURU.
151
R/AT NO.68, 5TH MAIN ROAD
6TH CROSS, HEALTH LAYOUT
BENGALURU.
NATIVE: MANAGAL VILLAGE
MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562159.
3 . S.K. MURTHY
S/O LATE K. SUBRAMANYA
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR. R/AT NO.504, 8TH CROSS, 7TH BLOCK WEST JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 082. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.619/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.974/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C I D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560001.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
152
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION
R/AT NO. 5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560 026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOMMANAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563125.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R R NAGAR SUB DIVISION, BBMP
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD
J P NAGAR, II PHASE
BENGALURU - 560 078.
3 . K.M. KUMARASWAMY
S/O MARANNA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER
R R NAGAR SUB DIVISION.
R/AT NO.375, 4TH MAIN ROAD
6THB CROSS, AROGYA LAYOUT
ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 091.
AND ALSO AT:
KARIOBANAHALLI, HIRIYURU TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 511.
153
4 . N. MURALIDHAR
S/O LATE M. NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
CLASS -1 CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.31, 4TH CROSS, 7TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560082. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3
R4 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.436/2018 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.976/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
154
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU - 560 003
PERMANENT ADDRESS
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN.
3. N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.129, 5TH CROSS
PUSHPAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU - 79.
4. B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
155
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU - 79.
5. M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT. No.62, 2NDMAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RDSTAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA
2NDSTAGE, BENGALURU-40.
6. M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT. No.247, 3RDMAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT.
7. D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC., BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT. No.27, 1STB MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD), RPC LAYOUT
2NDSTAGE, VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU-40.
… RESPONDENTS
156
(BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M. ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7
R2 SERVED
R5 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.799/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.977/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU.-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560040.
157
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD)
SANHATABAGARA SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.935, 64TH CROSS
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU-10.
3 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER, WARD NO.100
SANJAYANAGAR SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANKAR HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BENGALURU.-560024.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BENGALURU-79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
158
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT. NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4, R5 & R6
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 18.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.798/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.978/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALUUR METROPOLITAN
159
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D BENGALURU
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560040.
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SANJAYANAGAR SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 935, 64TH CROSS
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU-10.
3 . G.L. KESHAV MURTHY
S/O LANKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER, WARD NO.99
MATTIKERE SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM, BBMP
BENGALURU.
160
R/AT NO.345, 10TH CROSS
SARASWATHPURAM, NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU-96.
4 . C.P. UMESH
S/O LATE PUTTASWAMI GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.210, 5TH CROSS
10TH MAIN, NGEF LAYOUT
NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU-72. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1338/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.979/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
161
AND:
1 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT. No.1238, 11TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU - 560086.
ALSO AT JADAGANAPURA
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT.
2 . M/S. BALAJI CONSTRUCTIONS
CONTRACTORS
PROPRIETOR R. CHANDRA NAYAK
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
CLASS- I CONTRACTOR R/AT No.13/A/19
OMKAR NILAYA 5TH BLOCK
72ND CROSS, 17TH E MAIN
RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560010. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. LOHITH KUMAR N.S. ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.119/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
162
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.980/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU - 560 055. R/AT. NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
B.C.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYA NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SANJAYANAGARA SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARA DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 935, 64TH CROSS
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560010.
163
3 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, WARD NO.100
SANJAYANAGARA,
MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION, WEST ZONE
BENGALURU - 560094.
PRESENTLY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
K.R.CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001. R/AT NO. 204, POORVANKARA
HEBBAL KEMPAPURA
BENGALURU - 560024.
4 . T.G. SURESH
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO. M/39, 7TH CROSS
MARKET ROAD, L.N. PURA
BENGALURU - 560021.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. TAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP OFFICER, BENGALURU
EARLIER CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD,
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU - 560079.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
164
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPEE, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A.E/T.A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT
CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU - 560061
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573201. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5, R6 & R7
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.705/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1010/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
165
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . SRI. H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD)
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, IST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . SRI. S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU-560086.
NATIVE: JADAGANAPURA
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
3 . SRI. B. BASAVARAJA
S/O BALASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
CONTRACTOR.
166
R/AT NO.U/101, 3RD MAIN ROAD
6TH CROSS, SWATHANTRANAGARA
SRIRAMAPURA, BENGALURU-560021.
4 . SRI. B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY: CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU-560079.
5 . SRI. M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD)
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-40. R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560040.
6 . SRI. M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
IST CROSS, B.H.C.S. LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
167
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN-573103.
7 . SRI. B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD)
MALLESHWARAMA DIVISION
(WEST ZONE), BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
B.C.C. LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560040.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P.M. ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOATE FOR R3
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 TO R7)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.10.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1331/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1011/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
168
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . SRI. C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA DIVISION
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS
BOMMAPALLI
CHINTHAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
2 . SRI. N. MURALIDHAR
S/O LATE M. NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.31, 4TH CROSS
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-82.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR H. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 - SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.166/2017 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
169
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1012/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560001.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WARD NO.100, SANJAYANAGAR
MATHIKERE SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
PRESENTLY OFFICE OF THE
CHIEF ENGINEER
K.R CIRCLE, BENGALURU 01.
R/AT NO.L-204, POORVANKARA
HEBBALA, KEMPAPURA
BENGLAURU.
2 . M. NAGESH
S/O MAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.3520/A, 7th CROSS
GAYATHRI NAGAR
BENGALURU 560 028.
170
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3rd MAIN ROAD 1st CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU 560 061.
NATIVE: BACK TO MINI VIDHANA SOUDA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT 573 103.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE FOR R3
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H, ADVCOATE FOR R2
V/O.DATED 03.02.2025 NOTICE TO R1 IS H/S TO R1) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.704/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1013/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU 560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
171
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR DIVISION.
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU 560 026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS
BOMMAPALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKBALLAPURA DISTRICT 562 101.
2 . N. MURALIDHAR
S/O LATE M. NARAYANA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
CLASS-1 CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.31, 4th CROSS 7th BLOCK, JAYANAGAR
BENGALURU 560 082.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR H. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. PADMAPRASAD B. NASHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.09.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.165/2017 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
172
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1014/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC., BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . S. SHIVAMALLU
S/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
R/AT NO.1238, 11TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU 560 086.
ALSO AT JADAGANAPURA
MALAVALLI TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
173
3 . CHANDRU R
S/O RAMAPPA R/AT NO.204, 2nd FLOOR
AHUJA CHAMBERS NO.1
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU 560 001.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560 040.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU-560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT -593103.
6 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
174
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003.
PERMANENT ADRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR-563101. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R3
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5
SMT. ANITHA N, ADVOCATE FOR R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.120/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1016/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU- 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
175
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560 040.
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD.)
SANJAYANAGARA SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.934, 64TH CROSS
5TH DIVISION, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU 560 010.
3 . G.L. KESHAVAMURTHY
S/O LATE LANKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WARD NO.99, MATTIKERE SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM, BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.345, 10TH CROSS
SARASWATHIPURAM, NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU-560 096.
4 . M. NAGESH
S/O LATE MAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
CONTRACTOR, R/AT. NO.3520/A,
7TH CROSS GAYATHRINAGARA,
BENGALURU 560 028.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
O/O THE BBMP, BENGALURU.
176
PREVIOUSLY: CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA, BENGALURU-79.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RETD.,)
OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU 560 040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLANSANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT -573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B. ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN H, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 08.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.339/2020 ON THE FILE OF
177
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1017/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYAN
S/O CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SWD
BBMP CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGARA (FORMER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT. NO.405, 11TH CROSS
178
14TH MAIN ROAD
J P NAGARA, II PHASE
BENGALURU-78.
3 . B.P. PARAMESH
S/O B.K. PUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
OCC ASST. ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB DIVISION
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA DIVISION
BBMP, PRESELTLY: BHOO SENE VIBHAGA
JUNIOR ENGINEER
NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
RAJABHAVANA ROAD, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.3009, 13TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-40.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOODANURU GRAMA
KERALAPURA, ARAKALGUDU TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573102.
4 . S.D. SHASHIKUMAR
S/O DEVEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
45/E, 14TH MAIN ROAD VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU-40. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
SRI. SHANTHI BHUSHAN N, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.11.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.108/2015 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
179
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1018/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU - 86.
2 . B.N. VISHWANATH
S/O B.N. NAGARAJ
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT. NO.123, 3RD CROSS
PIPE LINE ROAD, D.T.ROAD
SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 40.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER /
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
180
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLANSANDRA, BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 14.07.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.454/2019 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1019/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
181
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWD, BBMP, CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGARA
EARLIER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER OF
RAJARAJESWARINAGAR DIVISION
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT NO.405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR, II PHASE
BENGALURU - 560078.
3 . B.P. PARAMESH
S/O B.K. PUTTEGOWDA
MAJOR
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB DIVISION
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION, BBMP
PRESENTLY J.E. ARMY WING
NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
RAJ BHAVAN ROAD
BENGALURU - 01 R/AT NO.3009, 13TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
4 . M.J. NAGARAJ
S/O JAVAREGOWDA
MAJOR
NO.898, 18TH MAIN ROAD
5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560010. … RESPONDENTS
182
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.699/2020 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1020/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU.-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKARA
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
GANDHINAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT. No.1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU 560046.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
183
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT No.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM
BENGALURU 560003.
PERMANENT ADDRESS
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR DISTRICT 563101.
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT. No.129, 5TH CROSS
VRUSHABHAVATHI NAGAR
KAMAKSHIPALYA
BENGALURU 560079.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU. R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU.
184
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT.-573103.
6 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
T.V.C.C BBMP BENGALURU
R/AT. No.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD)
R.P.C. LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE
VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU 560040.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SMT. ANITHA N, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R6) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.90/2022 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1028/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY C I D POLICE
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE (BMTF)
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
185
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
THE THEN RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESWARINAGARA DIVISION
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560 026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT NO.405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD, J P NAGAR
II PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 078.
3 . G.S. LOKESH
S/O LATE SAKE GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR SUB DIVISION
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BBMP
PRESENTLY CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION
DEPT., OF PUBLIC WORKS
K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.23, 3RD CROSS
PANCHASHEELA LAYOUT
RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 098.
4 . N. HANUMANTHAPPA
S/O LATE NAGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
CLASS - I CONTRACTOR.
186
R/AT NO.21/1, 12TH A CROSS
AGRAHARA DASARAHALLI
MAGADI ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 079.
AND ALSO AT:
HESARUGHATTA HOBLI
KAMAKSHI PURA
BENGALURU NORTH
BENGALURU - 560089. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R3 SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R4) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397
R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.12.2023 PASSED IN SPL.C.C.NO.1333/2021 ON THE FILE OF
COURT OF LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER
THE PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1060/2024:
BETWEEN:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE, POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHENNAPPA
187
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION.
R/AT NO.5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560026.
NATIVE:
BOMMAPALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562101.
2 . L.K. SHIVANAND
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT NO.405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD, J.P.NAGAR
2ND PHASE, BENGALURU - 78.
3 . K.M. KUMARASWAMY
S/O MARANNA
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR SUB DIVISION
R/AT NO.375, 4TH MAIN ROAD 6TH 'B' CROSS, AROGYA LAYOUT
ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU - 91.
AND ALSO AT:
KARIOBANAHALLI, HIRIYURU TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501.
4 . S.K. MURTHY
S./O LATE K. SUBRAMANYA
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
CLASS I, CONTRACTOR
R/AT NO.504, 8TH CROSS
188
7TH BLOCK, WEST JAYANAGARA
BENGALURU - 560070. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R4 SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.620/2018 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1088/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SWD, BBMP, CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
4TH BLOCK, SHOPPING COMPLEX
JAYANAGARA (FORMER EXECUTIVE ENGINEER)
RAJARAJESWARINAGAR DIVISION.
189
R/AT NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU-560026.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER.
R/AT NO.405, 11TH CROSS
15TH MAIN ROAD, J.P. NAGAR
II PHASE, BENGALURU-78.
3 . B. PARAMESH
S/O B.K. PUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB-DIVISION
BBMP.
PRESENTLY AT LAND ARMY CORPORATION
J.E. NEAR TO CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.3009, 13TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-40.
PERMANENT R/AT.
BOODANURU GRAMA
KERALAPURA, ARAKALGUD TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573102.
4 . G.S. SHIVASWAMY
S/O G.K. SHIVARUDRAIAH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
LINGAYATH, CLASS-I CONTRACTOR M/S VINAYAKA CONSTRUCTIONS PROPRIETOR R/AT. NO.15/3-1, 2ND MAIN ROAD
MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-40.
190
PERMANENTLY R/AT.
GATTIPURA MAGADI TALUK
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 562159.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3
SRI. R. SWAROOP ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.10.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.663/2017 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL. JUDGE FOR
TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1104/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU.-560001 … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGALURU.
191
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU-560086.
2 . B. BASAVARAJ
S/O BALA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
CONTRACTOR, NO.U/101
3RDMAIN ROAD, 6TH CROSS
SWATHANTHRA NAGAR, SRIRAMPARA
BENGALURU-560021.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU-61
ALSO AT: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT 573125.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2
VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.89/2022 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
192
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1129/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D.,
BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . R. CHANDRU,
S/O. RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
AHUJA CHAMBERS, FLAT NO.204
2NDFLOOR, NO.1, KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 051.
2 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
AE/TA, BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO. 247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560 061.
ALSO AT BEHIND MINI
VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 125.
193
3 . M. PRABHU,
S/O. LATE MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB-DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU
R/AT NO.13, 9THCROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-03.
ALSO AT SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR-563 101. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI DEEPAK K. BAJANTRI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SMT. ANITHA N., ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.87/2022 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1130/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D.,
BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560 001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W.
SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP)
194
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR,
S/O. LATE B.R.GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH,
S/O. LATE MASTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD),
YESHWANTHPURA SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.154, 4TH CROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE
J.P. NAGARA
BENGALURU-560 076.
3 . N.S. REVANNA,
S/O. SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU-560 086.
4 . R. CHANDRU,
S/O. LATE RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
PROP: M/S. AISHWARAYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS
R/AT: FLAT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR
AHUJA CHAMBER, NO.1
195
KUMARA KRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 051.
5 . B.T.RAMESH,
S/O. LATE B.H.THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP,
BENGALURU
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU-560 079.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ,
S/O. LATE D.M.MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560 040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU,
S/O.MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
AE/TA BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560 061
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573 103.
196
8 . G.R.KUMAR,
S/O.G.H.RAMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
WARD NO.1, MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.7, 4TH CROSS
BRUNDAVANA NAGARA
MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560 054. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 TO R7;
SRI KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI CHANDRASHEKARA K., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4 & R8) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.1336/2021 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL
JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1131/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
197
AND:
1 . C. NARAYAN
S/O CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA DIVISION
BENGALURU
R/AT. NO.5/15, II MAIN ROAD BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU-560026.
NATIVE: BOMMAPALLI
CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563125.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
R/AT. NO.405, 11TH CROSS
14TH MAIN ROAD, J P NAGARA
II PHASE, BENGALURU-78.
3 . B.P. PARAMESH
S/O B.K. PUTTEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA SUB DIVISION
BBMP, PRESELTLY J.E.
ARMY WING NEAR CHINNASWAMY STADIUM
BENGALURU-560001
R/AT No.3009, 13TH MAIN ROAD
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU-560040.
NATIVE OF BOODANOORU VILLAGE
KERALAPURA, ARAKALAGOODU TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT-573102.
4 . S.S. JOSHI
S/O LATE SHANTHAPPA, CONTRACTOR
198
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
PROPRIETOR: M/S PRAGATHI ENTERPRISES R/AT NO.17/2, 9TH F MAIN ROAD
PIPE LINE ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560040.
NATIVE: BEHIND KALPATARU COLLEGE
TIPATURU, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572201. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3 AND R4)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.621/2018 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETIION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1133/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
199
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
RETIRED ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560075.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE B. MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR.
3 . CHANDRU R
S/O RAMAPPA R/AT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR,
AHUJA CHAMBERS NO.1
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU-560001.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
200
BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-560040.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU-560061.
NATIVE BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT-573103.
6 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
TVCC BBMP BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST B MAIN ROAD
(PIPE LINE ROAD) R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYANAGARA
BENGALURU-560040. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GOPI P.M. ADVOCATE FOR R1
SMT. ANITHA N, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R6
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5)
201
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.700/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1298/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C I D BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.N. PRABHAKAR
S/O LATE H. NANJEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
GANDHI NAGAR DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO 1282, 1ST CROSS
BEML MAIN ROAD, NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU - 75.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY
202
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER WARD NO 27
GANDHINAGAR SUB DIVISION
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 03.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR - 563101. 3 . CHANDRAPPA @ R. CHANDRU S/O RAMAPPA
R/AT AHUJA CHAMBERS
FLAT NO 204, 2ND FLOOR
KUMARAKRUPA, BENGALURU - 01.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BMMP, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGARA
BENGALURU - 79.
5 . M. THYAGARAJ
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
203
ATTIGUPEE VIJAYANAGAR 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU - 40.
6 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
AE / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT. No.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLANSANDRA
BENGALURU.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA
HASSAN DISTRICT- 573103. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B. ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R6
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R5
R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08/11/2023 PASSED IN SPL. C.C. NO.698/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1319/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION
204
C.I.D. BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU - 560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYAN
S/O CHENNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
FORMERLY AT RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR DIVISION
R/AT NO. 5/15, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560026.
2 . S.M. RAJU
S/O MARIYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
VAKKALIGA COMMUNITY
CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT NO.159, 5TH MAIN ROAD
11TH CROSS, NGEF LAYOUT
NAGARABHAVI, BENGALURU - 560072. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15/12/2023 PASSED IN SPL. C.C. NO.104/2018 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
205
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1493/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
AGE ABOUT 70 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RTD)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/A NO.154, 4TH CROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE J P NAGAR
BENGALURU.
2 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGAURU.
R/AT No.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU - 560086.
3 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
206
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/AT No.129, 5TH CROSS
VRUSHABAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU- 79.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU - 560040.
5 . K. MARALUSIDDAPPA
S/O KARINAIKA
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER, TECHNICAL ASSISTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.08, 2ND
KUVEMPUNAGARA
T DASARAHALLI, BENGALURU - 3. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R4
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SEC.442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.123/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
207
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1506/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . R. CHANDRU
S/O RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
PROP. M/S. ISHWARYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS
R/AT. FLAT No.204, 2ND FLOOR AHUJA CHAMBERS No.1
KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001.
2 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT. NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALASANDRA, BENGALURU-560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573125. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2
R1 SERVED)
208
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.1339/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT BENGALURU
CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1540/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . C. NARAYANA
S/O CHANNAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWAR DIVISION.
R/AT No.5/15, II MAIN ROAD BYATARAYANAPURA, BENGALURU - 560026.
PERMANENT ADDRESS:
BOMMANAHALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK
CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT.
2 . L.K. SHIVANANDA
S/O KEMPEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER BENGALURU.
209
R/AT NO 405, 11TH CROSS
15TH MAIN ROAD
J P NAGAR II PHASE
BENGALURU - 560078.
3 . K.M. KUMARASWAMY
S/O MARANNA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
JUNIOR ENGINEER
RAJARAJESHWARI NAGARA
SUB DIVISION.
R/AT NO 375, 4TH MAIN ROAD
6TH B CROSS, AROGYA LAYOUT
ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR
BENGALURU - 560091.
AND ALSO AT:
KARIBONAHALLI, HIRIYURU TALUK
CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577598.
4 . M. RANGASWAMY
S/O MADATTI GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
CLASS- I CONTRACTOR
SPOORTHI CONSTRUCTIONS
R/AT NO 17, 6TH CROSS
CAUVERY LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040. … RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R4
R2 SERVED
R3 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.337/2018 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE
210
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT BENGALURU
CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1546/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D BENGALURU
REP BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO 139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.154, 4TH CROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE
J P NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560076.
211
3 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE
BENGLAURU.
R/AT No.566, 4TH CROSS
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU - 560086.
4 . N. SAMPATH KUMAR
S/O LATE NARAYANASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/AT No.129, 5TH CROSS
VRUSHABAVATHI NAGARA
KAMAKSHIPALYA, BENGALURU - 79.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 79.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/OLATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE
BENGALURU - 560040.
212
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 AND R7
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3, R4 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C. PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.341/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF LXXVII
ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT, AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1552/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
213
AND:
1 . D.A. ANWAR PASHA
S/O LATE H.R. AMEER JAN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TVCC
BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.27, 1ST MAIN ROAD
(PIPELINE ROAD), R.P.C. LAYOUT
2ND STAGE, VIJAYA NAGARA
BENGALURU-560040.
2 . M. PRABHU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER.
R/AT NO.13, 9TH CROSS
SWIMMING POOL LAYOUT
MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-03.
NATIVE: SANTHE GATE EXTENSION
KOLAR TOWN, KOLAR.
3 . R. CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
R/AT FLAT NO.204, 2ND FLOOR
AHUJA CHAMBERS, NO.1,
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-01.
4 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
214
VIJAYA NAGARA, 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU-40.
5 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGAR,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R3 AND R4
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR V.B. ADVOCATE FOR R5
R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 27.10.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.1332/2021 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1557/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN
TASK FORCE POLICE STATION
215
C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . H.P. RAMESH
S/O LATE PUTTATHIMMEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
WARD NO.100, SANJAYANAGARA
MATTIKERE SUB-DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU-03.
PRESENTLY CHIEF ENGINEER OFFICE
K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU.
R/AT. NO.L-204, POORVANKAR HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA, BENGALURU-560024.
2 . M. NAGESH
S/O MAYANNA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT NO.3520/A, 7TH CROSS GAYATHRI NAGARA, BENGALURU-560021.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
A E/T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU-61. … RESPONDENTS
216
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D, ADVOCATE FOR R1
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3
R2 SERVED)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.706/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPL.JUDGE FOR
TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE P.C. ACT AT BENGALURU CITY
BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1562/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD
BCC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
217
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.154, 4TH CROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE
J P NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560076.
3 . N.S. REVANNA
S/O SIDDAPPA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
BBMP CENTRAL OFFICE, BENGLAURU.
R/AT NO 566, 4TH CROSS MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560086.
4 . R. CHANDRU
S/O LATE RAMAPPA
AGED MAJOR
PROPRIETOR M/S. ISHWARYA
INFRASTRUCTURES AND DEVELOPERS
R/AT FLAT No.204 , 2ND FLOOR AHUJA CHAMBERS, No.01
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP
BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 79.
218
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE
BENGALURU - 560040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 AND R7
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3, R4 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (FILED U/S 438 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.337/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE SPECIAL JUDGE
FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE PREVENTION OF
CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS RP.
219
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1565/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D., BENGALURU
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . R. CHANDRU
S/O RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
PROP M/S. ISHWARAYA INFRASTRUCTURES
AND DEVELOPERS
CONTRACTORS, R/AT FLAT NO.204
2ND FLOOR, AHUJA CHAMBER, NO.1
KUMARA KRUPA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001
(CONTRACTOR).
2 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
CHIEF ACCOUNTANT (RTD.,)
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU-40.
3 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
220
R/AT NO.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA, BENGALURU-61.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA,
HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
SRI. VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 (FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2023 PASSED
IN SPL.C.C.NO.1337/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF
LXXVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCE UNDER THE PREVENTION
OF CORRUPTION ACT AT BENGALURU CITY BY ALLOWING THIS
REVISION PETITION.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1569/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
221
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETIRED)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD, BCC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560040.
2 . Y.M. MUNIRAJU
S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
RETIRED ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SANJAYANAGAR SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM WEST ZONE
BENGLAURU.
R/AT No.935, 64TH CROSS
5TH DIVISION RAJAJINAGAR,
BENGALURU - 10.
3 . G.L. KESHAV MURTHY
S/O LATE LANKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
ASSISTANT ENGINEER WARD No.99
MATTIKERE SUB DIVISION
MALLESHWARAM, BBMP, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.345, 10TH CROSS,
SARASWATHIPURA, NANDINI LAYOUT
BENGALURU - 96.
4 . J.K. JAYARAM
S/O LATE KALEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/AT No.911, 10TH CROSS
10TH MAIN, SRINAGAR
BENGALURU - 560050. ALSO AT No.52, MARALIGA POST
GOLLARADODDI, KOPPA HOBLI
MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
5 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
222
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 79.
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGARA 2NDSTAGE
BENGALURU - 560040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E / T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1ST CROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.B. VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R5 AND R7
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE FOR R6
223
SRI. P.M. GOPI, ADVOCATE FOR R2
SRI. H. SHANTHI BHUSHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4
NOTICE TO R3 IS H/S V/O DATED 20.02.2025) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 15.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.701/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1570/2024:
BETWEEN:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE
POLICE STATION, C.I.D BENGALURU
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDING
BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.A. BELLIAPPA, SPP A/W
SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP)
AND:
1 . B.G. PRAKASH KUMAR
S/O LATE B.R. GOPAL GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
RETIRED EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT NO.139, 10TH MAIN ROAD, BCC LAYOUT VIJAYNAGAR, BENGALURU-560040.
2 . T.N. BETTASWAMAIAH
S/O LATE MASTAIAH
224
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD)
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.154, 4TH CROSS
SAI ENCLAVE, 8TH STAGE
J P NAGARA, BENGALURU - 560076.
3 . S. MANOJ KUMAR
S/O SHIVADEVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
ASST. ENGINEER
MALLESHWARAM DIVISION
BBMP BENGALURU.
R/AT No.35, SRI SHARADHA 4THMAIN
2ND CROSS, RAMAMOHAN
NEAR DAIVAGNA PARK
BENGALURU.
4 . B.T. RAMESH
S/O LATE B.H. THAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ENGINEER
OFFICE OF THE BBMP, BENGALURU.
PREVIOUSLY CHIEF ENGINEER
WEST ZONE, BBMP OFFICE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.702, 9TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE
BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU - 79.
5 . R. CHANDRU
S/O RAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
CONTRACTOR
R/AT FLAT No.204, 2ND FLOOR AHUJA CHAMBERS No.01
KUMARAKRUPA ROAD
BENGALURU - 560001.
225
6 . M. THYAGARAJ
S/O LATE D.M. MUNIRAJAPPA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RETIRED CHIEF ACCOUNTANT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER
BBMP WEST ZONE, BENGALURU.
R/AT No.62, 2ND MAIN ROAD
BINNY LAYOUT, 3RD STAGE, ATTIGUPPE
VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE
BENGALURU - 560040.
7 . M. BASAVARAJU
S/O MUNISWAMY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
A E /T A BBMP WEST ZONE
BENGALURU.
R/AT No.247, 3RD MAIN ROAD
1STCROSS, BHCS LAYOUT
CHIKKALLASANDRA
BENGALURU - 560061.
NATIVE: BEHIND MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA
ARASIKERE NAGARA, HASSAN DISTRICT.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.B. VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R4 AND R7
SRI. KIRAN S. JAVALI, SR. COUNSEL FOR
SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R3, R5 AND R6)
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 08.11.2023 PASSED IN
SPL.C.C.NO.707/2020 ON THE FILE OF COURT OF LXXVII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND THE
SPECIAL JUDGE FOR TRYING OFFENCES UNDER THE
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, BENGALURU CITY, BY
ALLOWING THIS RP.
THESE CRIMINAL REVISION PETITIONS HAVING BEEN
HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 25.02.2025 THIS DAY,
THE COURT PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
226
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CAV ORDER
Heard the learned SPP appearing for the petitioner - State and the respective learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. These revision petitions are filed by the State being aggrieved by the orders of discharging the accused persons acting under Sections 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C. suo moto without any application for discharge by any of the accused persons.
3. For the sake of convenience, this Court would like to mention the details of the cases and revisions, impugned order passed on respective dates, amount manipulated, offences invoked against them, number of accused and number of accused discharged in respective cases which depicts as hereunder:
| Sl. No. | Crl.R.P.No | Impugned order dated | Spl. C. C. No. | Amt misappropriated in Rs. | Offences invoked | No. of accused persons | Discharged accused |
| 1 | 975/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 139/2020 | 9,90,581 and 16,76,235 | Sec.120B, 409, 465, 468, 477A of IPC and Sec.13(1)(c)(d) and 13(2) of PC Act | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 2 | 1714/2023 | 17.08.2023 | 236/2014 | 15,27,575 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 3 | 166/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 795/2020 | 4,56,368 | ditto | 9 | 4, 7 & 9 |
| 4 | 167/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 729/2018 | 16,57,364 | ditto | 9 | 3, 4, 7 & 9 |
| 5 | 168/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 508/2014 | 5,52,882.93 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
227
| 6 | 185/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 252/2016 | 33,24,971 | ditto | 8 | 3 to 5, 7 & 8 |
| 7 | 196/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 253/2016 | 39,12,880 | ditto | 8 | 3 to 5, 7 & 8 |
| 8 | 219/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 664/2017 | 3,26,251 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 9 | 224/2024 | 20.07.2023 | 557/2014 | 5,96,506 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 10 | 225/2024 | 20.07.2023 | 476/2014 | 3,57,599 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 11 | 226/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 477/2014 | 16,39,574 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 12 | 242/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 556/2014 | 16,96,108 | ditto | 4 | 1, 2 & 4 |
| 13 | 243/2024 | 17.08.2023 | 727/2018 | 19,71,979 | ditto | 9 | 3, 4, 7 & 9 |
| 14 | 244/2024 | 20.07.2023 | 274/2016 | 3,30,770 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4, 6 to 8 |
| 15 | 475/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 521/2018 | 11,56,430 and 22,01,954 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 7 |
| 16 | 480/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 422/2018 | 24,89,066.70 and 18,66,803 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 7 |
| 17 | 484/2024 | 21.09.2023 | 411/2014 | 1,426,447 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 18 | 486/2024 | 14.09.2023 | 124/2021 | 543,192 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 4, 6 & 7 |
| 19 | 487/2024 | 21.09.2023 | 1198/2019 | 46,11,472 and 22,33,292 | ditto | 8 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 20 | 503/2024 | 21.09.2023 | 555/2014 | 2,221,800 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 21 | 524/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 135/2020 | 2,251,671 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 22 | 534/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 418/2018 | 2,266,449 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 4 & 7 |
| 23 | 537/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 138/2020 | 2,262,272 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 24 | 538/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 34/2020 | 2,256,708 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 25 | 542/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 618/2018 | 23,13,900 and 18,78,546 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 7 |
| 26 | 543/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 338/2018 | 2,497,065 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 27 | 544/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 136/2020 | 2,147,585 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 28 | 547/2024 | 14.09.2023 | 122/2021 | 2,201,877 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 29 | 623/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 730/2018 | 24,89,731 and 22,46,164 | ditto | 9 | 2 to 9 |
| 30 | 642/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 665/2017 | 2,70,346 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 31 | 650/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 29/2020 | 43,08,700 and 18,09,732 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 8 |
| 32 | 651/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 855/2019 | 16,91,282 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 33 | 652/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 860/2019 | 7,97,531 | ditto | 8 | 4 & 7 |
| 34 | 653/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 1202/2019 | 22,44,356 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 7 |
| 35 | 654/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 32/2020 | 17,57,178 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 36 | 655/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 456/2019 | 17,65,161 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 37 | 660/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 28/2020 | 13,25,314 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4 & 6 to 8 |
| 38 | 663/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 728/2018 | 32,95,880 and 18,03,983 | ditto | 10 | 3, 4 & 7 to 9 |
| 39 | 664/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 30/2020 | 20,47,797 | ditto | 8 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 40 | 665/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 527/2018 | 24,83,898 | ditto | 8 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 41 | 697/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 858/2019 | 16,91,573 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 42 | 701/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 731/2018 | 15,58,692 and 22,44,987 | ditto | 9 | 3, 4, 7 & 9 |
| 43 | 702/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 339/2018 | 41,10,278 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
228
| 44 | 705/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 31/2020 | 23,94,463 | ditto | 8 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 45 | 757/2024 | 14.09.2023 | 116/2021 | 22,55,573 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 46 | 759/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 144/2020 | 69,45,969 and 22,10,917 | ditto | 6 | 2 to 6 |
| 47 | 760/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 569/2019 | 16,82,847 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 48 | 762/2024 | 27.09.2023 | 167/2017 | 10,42,807 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 49 | 763/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 140/2020 | 49,39,778 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4 & 6 to 8 |
| 50 | 767/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 572/2019 | 17,74,505 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 51 | 768/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 570/2019 | 16,44,856 | ditto | 7 | 3 & 7 |
| 52 | 769/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 525/2018 | 1,22,699 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 53 | 770/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 137/2020 | 34,20,845 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 8 |
| 54 | 780/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 107/2018 | 35,76,105 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 55 | 782/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 800/2020 | 5,84,452 and 15,63,301 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 56 | 786/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 791/2020 | 12,93,586 and 16,63,572 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 57 | 791/2024 | 23.08.2023 | 33/2020 | 17,48,358 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 58 | 793/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 856/2019 | 30,59,271 | ditto | 4 | 2 to 4 |
| 59 | 798/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 141/2020 | 10,72,951 and 22,41,972 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 8 |
| 60 | 849/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 793/2020 | 4,49,559 and 15,40,070 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 61 | 851/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 455/2019 | 11,67,716 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 62 | 855/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 857/2019 | 16,55,531 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 63 | 872/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 859/2019 | 22,29,816 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 64 | 877/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 792/2020 | 7,10,248 and 16,68,089 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 65 | 898/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 571/2019 | 22,69,538 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 66 | 900/2024 | 20.12.2023 | 88/2022 | 79,77,340 and 17,71,021 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 67 | 959/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 336/2018 | 15,75,600 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 68 | 961/2024 | 20.09.2023 | 617/2018 | 35,99,771 and 17,53,763 | ditto | 8 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 69 | 962/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 437/2018 | 3,45,158 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 70 | 963/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1330/2021 | 15,82,966 and 22,49,739 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 71 | 964/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 103/2018 | 6,19,165 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 72 | 965/2024 | 20.12.2023 | 86/2022 | 21,80,436 | ditto | 4 | 2 to 4 |
| 73 | 966/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 109/2015 | 23,44,830 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 74 | 967/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 335/2020 | 11,03,689 and 17,19,691 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 75 | 968/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 1200/2019 | 17,77,296 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 76 | 969/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 142/2020 | 26,42,626 and 9,61,749 | ditto | 6 | 2 to 4, 6 to 8 |
| 77 | 970/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 794/2020 | 8,60,793 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 78 | 971/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1334/2021 | 22,70,261 and 5,27,283 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 4, 6 & 7 |
229
| 79 | 973/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 619/2018 | 25,16,453 | ditto | 4 | 1, 3 & 4 |
| 80 | 974/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 436/2018 | 5,35,602 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 81 | 976/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 799/2020 | 25,84,501 and 22,45,240 | ditto | 8 | 2 & 8 |
| 82 | 977/2024 | 18.10.2023 | 798/2020 | 20,37,557 and 16,91,416 | ditto | 7 | 3 & 5 to7 |
| 83 | 978/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1338/2021 | 6,85,879 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 84 | 979/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 119/2021 | 31,54,795 | ditto | 4 | 3 & 4 |
| 85 | 980/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 705/2020 | 30,64,051 and 18,60,416 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 86 | 1010/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1331/2021 | 16,09,282 and 17,59,695 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 8 |
| 87 | 1011/2024 | 27.09.2023 | 166/2017 | 5,41,796 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 88 | 1012/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 704/2020 | 7,53,042 and 21,26,527 | ditto | 6 | 3,4 & 7 |
| 89 | 1013/2024 | 27.09.2023 | 165/2017 | 3,53,376 | ditto | 4 | 1 & 4 |
| 90 | 1014/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 120/2021 | 17,90,039 and 5,10,433 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4 & 6 to 8 |
| 91 | 1016/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 339/2020 | 5,98,655 and 17,53,225 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 92 | 1017/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 108/2015 | 31,45,509 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 93 | 1018/2024 | 14.07.2023 | 454/2019 | 17,22,683 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 94 | 1019/2024 | 27.12.2023 | 699/2020 | 4,38,546 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 95 | 1020/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 90/2022 | 79,07,607 and 9,46,541 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4 & 6 to 8 |
| 96 | 1028/2024 | 27.12.2023 | 1333/2021 | 4,21,829 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 97 | 1060/2024 | 27.12.2023 | 620/2018 | 3,08,538.30 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 98 | 1088/2024 | 13.10.2023 | 663/2017 | 9,29,125 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 99 | 1104/2024 | 20.12.2023 | 89/2022 | 14,64,530 and 17,01,485 | ditto | 7 | 3, 4 & 7 |
| 100 | 1129/2024 | 20.12.2023 | 87/2022 | 29,05,209 and 5,37,488 | ditto | 8 | 4, 7 & 8 |
| 101 | 1130/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1336/2021 | 41,00,617 and 22,80,876 | ditto | 8 | 1 to 8 |
| 102 | 1131/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 621/2018 | 6,06,143.69 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 103 | 1133/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 700/2020 | 18,17,783 and 9,46,234 | ditto | 8 | 2 to 4 & 6 to 8 |
| 104 | 1298/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 698/2020 | 27,05,665 and 21,70,286 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 7 |
| 105 | 1319/2024 | 15.12.2023 | 104/2018 | 3,76,004 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 106 | 1493/2024 | 18.11.2023 | 123/2021 | 79,71,819 and 22,00,074 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 4, 6 & 7 |
| 107 | 1506/2024 | 18.11.2023 | 1339/2021 | 10,00,005 and 5,40,739 | ditto | 8 | 4 & 7 |
| 108 | 1540/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 337/2018 | 17,49,681 | ditto | 4 | 1 to 4 |
| 109 | 1546/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 341/2020 | 79,63,615 and 22,52,006 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
| 110 | 1552/2024 | 27.10.2023 | 1332/2021 | 29,23,587 and 5,32,850 | ditto | 7 | 2 to 4, 6 & 7 |
230
| 111 | 1557/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 706/2020 | 31,09,889 and 21,84,451 | ditto | 7 | 3,4 & 7 |
| 112 | 1562/2024 | 08.11.2023 | 337/2020 | 22,41,255 | ditto | 7 | 1 to7 |
| 113 | 1565/2024 | 18.11.2023 | 1337/2021 | 5,09,659 | ditto | 8 | 4,6 & 7 |
| 114 | 1569/2024 | 15.11.2023 | 701/2020 | 16,20,578 and 16,62,357 | ditto | 7 | 1 to7 |
| 115 | 1570/2024 | 08.09.2023 | 707/2020 | 31,73,741 and 22,49,159 | ditto | 7 | 1 to 7 |
4. The main grounds urged in all the revision petitions by the State that the order of discharge made by the Trial Court invoking Sections 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C., are contrary to the evidence, materials on record and opposed to law and facts and probabilities of the case, therefore, the impugned judgment and orders are liable to be set aside. The learned counsel appearing for the State also contend that the Trial Court has passed an order on the sustainability of the charge sheet after the commencement of the trial which is highly impermissible in law. It is also contended that the Trial Court had already rejected the application filed by the accused persons for discharge and again invoking of provision of Sections 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C does not arise and suo moto passed the said orders without any application. It is also contended that the Trial Judge has discharged the accused persons mainly on the ground that the prosecution has failed to produce the original Technical Vigilance Committee Cell report (for short 'TVCC report') and the same is
231
very much necessary to prove the case of the prosecution as the complaint was registered only on the basis of the TVCC report. The Trial Court has erred in discharging the accused persons for the reason that original TVCC report is not produced. The counsel further contend that if really the same is required, the Trial Court ought to have given the opportunity to lead secondary evidence by following the procedure prescribed under the Evidence Act and without there being an opportunity to prove the case, interdicted the proceedings and hence, the Trial Court has erroneously discharged the accused persons in an inappropriate manner. It is also contend that the Trial Court volunteered at the initial stages of the evidence itself to secure the presence of Chief Engineer, BBMP and voluntarily checked the availability of the original TVCC report in the office of the Chief Engineer, BBMP and on the basis of the statement of the Chief Engineer, BBMP, the Trial Court has come to the conclusion that the original TVCC report is not available and hence, the charge-sheet is not sustainable against the accused persons and shown personal interest in interdicting the proceedings by volunteering the Court.
232
5. The counsel for the State further contend that the Trial Court committed an error in discharging the accused persons at the stage of evidence by taking note of the subsequent developments and changed circumstance which is highly impermissible in law and the conclusion of the Trial Court that the charge-sheet is not sustainable is also erroneous since after rejection of discharge application, passed such orders at an inappropriate stage which is illegal and contrary to law. It is also contend that the Trial Court has overlooked the settled principles of law that in the absence of primary evidence, the parties are at liberty to adduce the secondary evidence before the Court at the time of evidence and without looking into the settled principles of law in a proper perspective, the Trial Court passed such an erroneous order. It is also contended that the Trial Court has also made an observation that separate charge-sheets have been filed with respect of one FIR and has come to a wrong conclusion that the prosecution should have registered separate complaints on the basis of which separate charge-sheets could have been filed. But in the instant case, the prosecution has filed separate charge-sheets with respect to one complaint and hence, the order is not sustainable in the eye of law. The Trial
233
Court committed an error in passing such an order since crores of rupees are misappropriated as detailed above in the chart.
6. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court that multiple cases have been registered and the same has been challenged by filing separate charge-sheets on one FIR before this Court in W.P.No.7246-7250/2013 and connected matters and this Court vide its order dated 26.09.2013, upheld the validity of filing of multiple charge-sheets in one crime number. Thus, the Trial Court has lost sight of the same while considering the validity of filing of separate charge-sheets in one crime number. The counsel appearing for the State also brought to notice of this Court the observations made by this Court in
W.P.No.7246-7250/2013 with regard to maintainability of several charge-sheets based on one complaint. In paragraph 36 of the said judgment, this Court referred the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2011) 3 SCC 758 in the case of
ASHOK KUMAR TODI vs KISHWAR JAHAN AND OTHERS
and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 49 of the said judgment wherein the Apex Court held that it cannot be said that the CID police had no competence to file charge-sheet under Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. Having regard to the fact that
234
the Government transferred the investigation to CID police, the CID police assumed the status of officer-in-charge of the police empowered to take all necessary steps as contemplated by the Code regarding investigation of the case including the power to form final opinion and to place the charge-sheet before the jurisdictional Court.
7. In paragraph 37, this Court made an observation that the investigation relate to a long period from 2005-06 up to 2011-12 in respect of different Engineering Divisions. The illegalities and irregularities alleged, covers large number of officials and officers apart from Civil Contractors. Therefore, having regard to the above facts and circumstances, it cannot be expected that the CID should file a single charge-sheet. On the other hand, on completion of investigation as regards particular work during a particular period, the CID has filed charge-sheets against those officers/officials/contractors involved in such work. Therefore, comes to the conclusion that no illegalities or irregularities by CID in filing multiple charge-sheets and same involves examination of large number of records, registers, etc., and therefore, very few charge-sheets have been filed and many more charge-sheets are expected to be filed as and when the
235
investigation progresses and when the Court already comes to such a conclusion, the very same ground cannot be urged before this Court.
8. The counsel for the State also given the details of chart wherein it discloses that even after quashing of proceedings, the papers are moved before the competent authority and sanctions are given. The counsel also would vehemently contend that sanctions are obtained and also the judgment passed by this Court in W.P.No.7246-7250/2013
referred supra also challenged before the Apex Court and the Apex Court also upheld the judgment. The counsel also would vehemently contend that the Trial Court passed the suo moto order and the same is not permissible in the eye of law and the reasoning given by the Trial Court in paragraph 14 is contrary to the observations made by this Court in W.P.No.7246- 7250/2013. The counsel also would vehemently contend that the sanction is given subsequent to the quashing of proceedings in some of the cases and proceedings cannot be terminated only on the ground of non-production of original TVCC report. The counsel also would vehemently contend that when the cognizance was taken and discharge application was dismissed,
236
the question of discharging the accused persons once again does not arise. The counsel also would vehemently contend that having considered the material on record, charges were framed on 03.03.2022 and charge sheet also filed and apart from that CW2 has been examined as PW1 on 24.03.2023 and new Presiding Officer took charge on 25.05.2023 and suo moto taken up the matter on 19.06.2023 and discharged all the accused persons in all the cases suo moto without any application filed by the accused persons and hence, the very approach of the Trial Court is erroneous.
9. Per contra, the learned Senior Counsel Sri Jawali appearing for the counsel Sri Chandrashekar who appears for respondents in some of the cases would vehemently contend that there was no sanction and in W.P.No.8362/2021, quashed the proceedings initiated against some of the accused persons. However, liberty was given. The counsel also filed separate chart in respect of 82 cases and details are given in the chart and also mentioned the offences which have been invoked against the respective respondents in those cases and also grounds urged that without sanction, prosecution was taken up and multiple charge-sheets were filed and some of the
237
proceedings were initiated against the officials who have been retired from the service.
10. The counsel also would vehemently contend that if any sanction is granted subsequent to quashing of proceedings since liberty was given and same has to be placed before the Trial Court and they have to follow the procedure by reopening the cases as observed in the order of this Court. The counsel also would vehemently contend that the Trial Court also having taken note of the reasoning given in W.P.No.19480/2022
decided on 29.03.2023, relied upon the principle and passed the impugned order and hence, it does not require any interference by this Court wherein this Court held that there cannot be stand alone charge-sheet without FIR and the said order has been challenged before the Apex Court and the Apex Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.61305/2016 and connected matters decided on 05.07.2022 and brought to notice of this Court paragraph 8 of the said judgment wherein Rule 214(3) and sub-Rule (6)(b) of the Rules, specifies that no judicial proceedings, if not instituted while the Government servant was in service, whether before his retirement or during
238
his re-employment shall be instituted in respect of a cause of action which arose or in respect of an event which took place, more than four years before such institution. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court that the said order has been challenged before the Apex Court in SLP (CIVIL) DAIRY No.2275/2023 wherein notice has been ordered. The counsel referring these judgments would vehemently contend that the Trial Court has rightly comes to the conclusion that there cannot be several charge-sheets based on the same complaint.
11. The counsel Sri P N Hegde appearing for the respondents in 27 cases would vehemently contend that stand alone charge-sheet has been filed and also contend that no sanction under Section 197 and Section 19 of PC Act and charge- sheet is also filed by CID since CID took investigation and CID police is not in-charge of police station under Section 173. The counsel also would vehemently contend that stages are different in different cases. In some of the cases, status is for hear before charge and in some of the cases, charges are framed and in some of the cases, trial also commenced and without sanction, cannot proceed against the accused persons. The counsel also
239
given the chart wherein it shows that the cases are posted for evidence.
12. The counsel also relied upon the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.19480/2022 in the case of T P MUNNINARAYANAPPA vs STATE BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA decided on 29.03.2023. The counsel also would vehemently contend that question of validity of sanction can be raised at any stage of proceedings. The accused has raised the said question by filing applications under Section 227 of Cr.P.C wherever the stage of the case was hear before the charges. The cases in which charges were already framed, the accused questioned the validity of the sanction by filing an application under Section 19 of the PC Act. In some of the cases, the Trial Court has proceeded to interdict the proceedings suo moto having noticed the absence of sanction. The reasoning given by the Trial Court is well within its jurisdiction and the interdicting of the proceedings is valid in the absence of proper sanction. The orders under challenge are nomenclature as sustainability of the charge sheet. It is well settled law that the wrong mentioning of the correct nomenclature itself does not vitiates the order.
240
13. The counsel in support of his arguments relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2015) 14 SCC 186
in the case of NANJAPPA vs STATE OF KARNATAKA and brought to notice of this Court paragraphs 21 and 22 wherein it is held that the question of validity of an order of sanction under Section 197 Cr.P.C could be raised and considered at any stage of proceedings. The competency of the court against the accused depends upon the existence of valid sanction if the Trial Court proceeds, despite the invalidity attached to the sanction order, the same shall be deemed to be non est.
14. The counsel also relied upon the judgment passed by this Court in W.P.No.8362/2021 and connected matters
decided on 21.04.2023 wherein also proceedings was quashed on the ground of sanction and liberty is reserved to the prosecution to obtain and place on record a valid sanction from the competent authority before the concerned Court and on such production, the concerned Court is at liberty to continue the prosecution from the stage of taking cognizance and also time bound direction was given to consider the sanction.
241
15. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2009) 9 SCC 173 in the case of P K PALANISAMY vs N ARUMUGHAM AND ANOTHER and referring this judgment the counsel would vehemently contend that the order under challenge are nomenclature as sustainability of the charge-sheet. It is well settled law that the wrong mentioning of the correct nomenclature itself does not vitiates the order.
16. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of this Court passed in W.P.NO.56754/2018 in the case of SRI MANJUNATH HEBBAR vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER decided on 13.12.2021 wherein this Court held that while allowing the writ petition by quashing the proceedings in respect of the petitioner and the same would be restricted to the petitioner. It is also observed that the trial, if any, pending against any other accused shall be considered by the competent Court without being influenced by the observations or the findings in the case on hand.
17. The counsel Sri Vijayakumar appearing for some of the respondents would vehemently contend that even though
242
liberty was given, no sanction was obtained and only in some of the cases, sanction was given and in some of the cases, sanction was refused. The counsel also in support of his arguments relied upon the order passed by this Court in W.P.NO.18890/2022 AND CONNECTED MATTERS decided on 21.04.2023 and brought to notice of this Court with regard to taking of cognizance of the offences and registering the criminal cases without there being sanction for such prosecution either under Section 19 of the PC Act or under Section 197 of the Cr.P.C and also taken note of identical issues of all other co-accused which was considered in W.P.NO.8362/2021 AND CONNECTED MATTERS and having considered the same, the writ petitions are allowed and quashed taking of cognizance of the offences, however liberty was given to the prosecution to obtain and place on record a valid sanction from the competent authority before the concerned Court and on such production, the concerned Court is at liberty to continue the prosecution from the stage of taking cognizance and also direction was given to consider this sanction within time bound period of three months.
18. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2012)12 SCC 614 in the case of
243
SATISH MEHRA vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER
wherein the Apex Court held that the power to interdict a proceeding either at the threshold or at an intermediate stage of the trial is inherent in a High Court on the broad principle that in case the allegations made in the FIR or the criminal complaint, as may be, prima facie do not disclose a triable offence, there can be reason as to why the accused should be made to suffer the agony of legal proceeding that more often than not gets protracted. Invoking Section 482 of Cr.P.C held that power to quash proceedings after charges were framed is wider as evidence adduced while submitting charge-sheet can be looked into for determining disclosure of offence against accused, where allegations do not disclose prima facie case and prosecution of accused would result in abuse of process then proceedings can be quashed either at early stage or at later stage.
19. The counsel also relied upon the judgment reported in (2014) 16 SCC 807 in the case of STATE OF PUNJAB vs LABH SINGH and the counsel referring this judgment would contend that an observation is made that action of appellant State in waiting for retirement of public servant and filing charge-sheet thereafter, thus setting at naught protection
244
available to him under Section 19 strongly deprecated and protection is available to public servant even after retirement in respect of offences punishable under the Penal Code.
20. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court statement of objections filed in Crl.R.P.No.975/2024 wherein referred Annexure-R1 as well as R2 wherein sanction was refused to some of the accused vide order dated 01.07.2024. The counsel also relied upon judgment of AMIRK SINGH vs STATE OF PEPSU reported in 1955 (1) SCR 1302 wherein held that sanction for prosecution under Section 197(1) of the Cr.P.C would be necessary irrespective of whether it was, in fact, a proper discharge of his duties, because that would really be a matter of defence on the merits, which would have to be investigated at the trial, and could not arise at the stage of the grant of sanction, which must precede the institution of the prosecution.
21. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2016) 12 SCC 87 in the case of
DEVINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB and brought to notice of this Court paragraph 39.2 wherein it is held that once
245
act or omission has been found to have been committed by public servant in discharging his duty it must be given liberal and wide construction so far its official nature is concerned. Public servant is not entitled to indulge in criminal activities. To that extent Section 197 of Cr.P.C has to be construed narrowly and in a restricted manner.
22. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (1973) 2 SCC 701 in the case of
PUKHRAJ vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN and brought to notice of this Court the law is well settled the difficulty really arises in applying the law to the facts of any particular case. The intention behind the sanction is to prevent public servants from being unnecessarily harassed. The counsel referring these judgments would vehemently contend that the order of taking cognizance cannot be obliterated. The contention that sanction would not require is unacceptable.
23. The counsel Sri C R. Gopalaswamy who appears for some of the respondents would vehemently contend that when the matter is pending before the Supreme Court, the order of this Court is not helpful and also TVCC report is not placed
246
before the Trial Court and in the absence of placing of TVCC report, very proceedings against the respondents vitiates. The counsel also would vehemently contend that revision petitions are not maintainable. The counsel also would vehemently contend that TVCC report is only a Xerox copy not the original one. The Trial Court rightly observed that the original document of TVCC report is not placed and hence, the proceedings cannot be continued.
24. The counsel Sri R Swaroop Anand appearing for some of the respondents would vehemently contend that no sanction is obtained under Section 197 of Cr.P.C and liberty may be given to file discharge application and the counsel also would vehemently contend that in some of the cases, order was passed on discharge application and the order impugned does not require any interference of this Court or otherwise, it amounts to abuse of process.
25. The counsel in support of his arguments relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 in the case of LALITA KUMARI vs GOVERNMENT OF U.P. AND OTHERS and brought to notice of this Court paragraph No.111,
247
wherein it is held that registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if the information discloses commission of a cognizable offence and no preliminary inquiry is permissible in such a situation. In the absence of any compliant or FIR, question of filing charge-sheet is not acceptable.
26. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2013) 5 SCC 762 in the case of VINAY TYAGI vs IRSHAD ALI AND OTHERS and brought to notice of this Court paragraph 13 wherein an observation is made with regard to relevant part of the scheme of the Code, now we must examine the powers of the Court to direct investigation invoking Section 156 in exercise of its powers under the Code. That is initial investigation, further investigation, fresh or de novo investigation and brought to notice of this Court paragraph 14 wherein it is held that empowered officer shall conduct in furtherance of an order for investigation passed by the Court of competent jurisdiction. In paragraph 15 with regard to the further investigation where the investigating officer obtains further oral or documentary evidence after the final report has been filed before the Court in terms of Section 173. The counsel
248
also brought to notice of this Court a scope of further investigation and supplementary report and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 16 wherein discussion was made with regard to the fresh investigation, reinvestigation or de novo investigation there has to be a definite order of the Court and discussion was made with regard to Article 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 30 wherein discussion was made with regard to scope of Section 173(2) read with Section 173 and Section 156 of the Code.
27. The counsel also relied upon the judgment passed in
CIVIL APPEAL No.20982/2017 dated 08.02.2018 and brought to notice of this Court paragraph 146 wherein discussion was made with regard to the concept of 'per incuriam' signifies those decisions rendered in ignorance or forgetfulness of some inconsistent statutory provisions and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 147(e) wherein discussion was made with regard to the decision reported in AIR 2011 SC 1989 in the case of NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN (III) vs STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 148 with regard to refer the case to larger Bench,
249
reliance was placed by the landowners on SANT LAL GUPTA vs MODERN COOP. SOCIETIES LTD reported in (2010) 13 SCC 336 wherein it is held that the rule of precedent is binding for the reasons that there is a desire to secure uniformity and certainty in law. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court discussion made in paragraph 149 so also paragraph 150 wherein discussion was made with regard to Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph 151, 32 to 37 and 39. The counsel referring these judgments would vehemently contend that the order impugned does not require any interference of this Court.
28. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court the statement of objections filed on behalf of the respondent in Crl.R.P.No.1088/2024 and brought to notice of this Court regarding registration of FIR based on the complaint of one of the officials of BBMP as per Annexure-R1 and later the petitioner herein was entrusted with the investigation and after conducting investigation, the CID filed the charge-sheet and produced the documents at Annexure-R2 and R3 and so also Annexure-R4 i.e., the copy of the charge-sheet and also taking of cognizance as per Annexure-R5 and also charge-sheets are filed before the
250
different Court and arraying of respondent as respondent No.6 in Spl.C.C.No.663/2017 and contend that all charge-sheets are filed based on the FIR in Cr.No.4/2011 and also contend that the original TVCC report is not produced along with the charge-sheet filed by the respondent before any Court and copy of TVCC report also produced at Annexure-R8 and brought to notice of this Court Annexure-R9 and also admission given by the witnesses that in Ex.P1 and P2, there is no any other reference to other BBMP ward number except 32 and 205. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court the answers elicited from the mouth of witnesses during the course of their cross-examination and contend that there is illegality in accepting the charge-sheet filed by the prosecution and ought to have been considered the charge-sheet and multiple charge-sheets are based on only single FIR and the present charge-sheets are not supplementary charge-sheet under Section 173 (8) but standalone charge-sheet Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. The counsel also would vehemently contend that without prejudice to the above the undersigned herein would like to traverse the contentions made in the petition. When they do not find original TVCC report and additional report, now the question raised is how attested copy
251
of TVCC report and additional TVCC report were obtained when there are no originals found with them and this itself is a wrong process and so called attested copies claimed by the prosecution cannot be branded as attested copies as original of them is still not available for inspection and contend that the Trial Court rightly passed the order in interdicting the proceedings and hence, it does not require interference.
29. The counsel Sri Partha appearing for some of the respondents would vehemently contend that the accused being the contractors were also erroneously booked in the case and false charge sheet has been filed against them. This counsel adopts the arguments of other counsel who appears for other respondents.
30. The counsel Sri S Rajashekar would vehemently contend that the charges are framed and original TVCC report is not placed before the court and hence, there cannot be any criminal prosecution against the contractors.
31. The counsel Sri Shanti Bhushan filed the written submission before the Court along with the citations and contend that improper registration of FIRs and filing of multiple charge-
252
sheets were based on a single FIR, which is impermissible in law. The lack of prior sanction under Section 197 of Cr.P.C and Section 19 of the PC Act rendering the prosecution is void and non-production of the original TVCC report which was the basis of the entire charge-sheet is also considered by the Trial Court while interdicting the proceedings. The counsel also contend that denial of a fair trial, violating Article 21 of the constitution of India since the State has preferred an appeal before the High Court, the order of discharge must be defended on strong legal principles. The charge-sheet is legally unsustainable due to fundamental defects in investigation since, the violation of criminal procedure and multiple charge-sheets are based on a single FIR and the prosecution filed multiple charge-sheets in 145 cases from a Single FIR and the Apex Court held that filing of multiple charge-sheets from one FIR is impermissible in the case of T.T. ANTORY vs STATE OF KERALA reported in
(2001) 6 SCC 181 wherein it is held that second FIR on the same facts is impermissible. The prosecution must consolidate all offences into one charge-sheet or file separate FIRs where different transactions are involved.
253
32. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2013) 6 SCC 384 in the case of ANJU CHOUDHARY vs STATE OF U.P. wherein it is held that filing of multiple charge-sheets without separate FIRs is illegally defective. Each offence must be independently registered and investigated properly and hence, the Trial Court correctly ruled that the charge-sheet was illegal and violated fundamental principles of criminal law. The counsel also would vehemently contend that the mandatory prior sanction for public servants was not obtained as contemplated under Section 19 of the PC Act and absence of prior sanction renders prosecution null and void and also the Courts cannot take cognizance of an offence against a public servant without prior sanction as held in the judgment reported in (1996) 11 SCC 439 in the case of STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH vs DR. KRISHNA CHANDRA
SAKSENA.
33. Learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2012) 3 SCC 64 in the case of
B.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. MANMOHAN SINGH, wherein it is held that sanction is a jurisdictional requirement, and failure to obtain it vitiates the entire proceedings. Since no valid
254
sanction was obtained, the charge-sheet was legally unsustainable, and the Trial Court correctly discharged the accused. With regard to failure to produce the original Technical Vigilance Committee Cell (TVCC) report, learned counsel would contend that TVCC report was the primary document forming the basis of the entire prosecution. The prosecution admitted that the original TVCC report was missing, and it relied on attested copies. The Trial Court also issued witness summons to produce the original report, but the prosecution failed to comply. It is contended that legal principle is that primary documentary evidence is essential for a valid charge-sheet.
34. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2011) 3 SCC 317 in the case of V.S. ACHUTHANANDAN VS. R. BALAKRISHNA PILLAI, wherein it is held that a trial cannot proceed when primary evidence is missing and reliance on attested copies without original documents renders a charge-sheet legally defective.
35. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2014) 5 SCC 108 in the case of STATE OF GUJARAT VS. KISHANBHAI, wherein it is held that
255
investigations must be based on primary documents and if the foundational evidence is missing, prosecution cannot be sustained.
36. The counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (1992) SUPP 1 SCC 335 in the case of
STATE OF HARIYANA VS. BHAJAN LAL and contend that a defective investigation violates fundamental rights and Courts must quash proceedings where investigations violate due process. Learned counsel would vehemently contend that this Court has already quashed similar cases, making further prosecution legally untenable and continuing the trial would violate the fundamental right of accused to a fair trial under Article 21. Hence, the Trial Court rightly discharged the accused persons and prayed this Court to dismiss the revision petitions.
37. Learned counsel also would vehemently contend that in the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2012) 12 SCC 406 in the case of AJAY KUMAR PARMAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN, the Apex Court clarified that Courts have the power to review and consider discharge applications based on the evolving nature of the evidence presented and contend that
256
under Sections 63 and 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, secondary evidence is admissible only if the prosecution convincingly establishes that the primary evidence is lost or unavailable due to circumstances beyond its control. However, the prosecution neither established the loss of the original report nor followed proper legal procedures to introduce secondary evidence. The prosecution claims that the Trial Court improperly volunteered to investigate the TVCC report by summoning the Chief Engineer, BBMP to verify the availability of the report. It is also contended that the Court is empowered to conduct necessary fact-finding measures to ensure a fair trial. In this case, verifying the availability of a crucial document was essential for determining the sustainability of the case and in the absence of original report, it directly impacts the prosecution ability to prove the charges.
38. Learned counsel would contend that while the High Court may have ruled that multiple charge-sheets were permissible, the Trial Court still had the authority to assess whether such a practice compromised the fairness of the trial. The principle of "one FIR, one charge-sheet" is a well-established legal norm, except in cases where different transactions occur
257
within the same offence. It is further contended that Trial Court exercised its discretion under Sections 227 and 239 Cr.P.C. after carefully examining the materials on record. Given the lack of primary evidence (TVCC report), procedural inconsistencies, and the failure of the prosecution to establish a prima facie case, the discharge was legally justified and mere dissatisfaction of the petitioners with the Trial Court's order is not a ground for setting it aside and the Appellate or Revisional Court can only intervene if there is a jurisdiction error, a manifest illegality and a gross miscarriage of justice. Hence, question of interfering with the order of the Trial Court does not arise.
39. Learned counsel also filed a memo dated 24.02.2025 along with the chart giving the details as to in which cases, he appears for respective respondents and he also adopts the written submissions filed in Crl.R.P.No.975/2024 in all the petitions which are stated therein.
40. Sri P.M. Gopi, learned counsel for the respondents also filed a memo dated 20.02.2025 stating the details in which cases, the Trial Court has framed charges and trial has been commenced i.e., in total 20 cases.
258
41. Sri M. Basavaraj, learned counsel for the respondents has also filed a statement on 20.02.2025 stating the details in which cases, he appears for the respective respondents i.e., in total 75 cases and Sri Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel has also filed a statement giving the details in which cases he appears for the respective respondents.
42. Sri Hanumantharaya D., learned counsel has also filed a memo stating in which cases, he appears for the respective respondents i.e., accused No.3 in all the cases which are stated therein, except Crl.R.P.No.543/2024 for accused No.2 and contend that all these matters are discharged at the stage of sustainability of charge-sheet, charge is not framed in all the cases and in the cases mentioned therein, the accused are discharged having considered the material on record.
43. Sri S. Rajashekar, learned counsel would submit that in Crl.R.P.No.168/2024 arising out of Spl.C.C.No.508/2014, charges are framed against respondent No.3. In Crl.R.P.No.1714/2023 arising out of Spl.C.C.No.236/2014 and Crl.R.P.No.769/2024 arising out of Spl.C.C.No.525/2014, charges are framed against respondent Nos.2 and 3 and contend
259
that there is no legal impediment for the Court to discharge the accused persons, even though charges have been framed.
44. Sri R. Swaroop Anand, learned counsel though contend that order was passed on discharge application, mainly relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2013)
5 SCC 762 in the case of VINAY TYAGI VS. IRSHAD ALI AND OTHERS, particularly paragraph Nos.13 to 16. Learned counsel would contend that stand alone charge-sheet is filed, no permission was taken under Section 178 Cr.P.C. and stand alone charge-sheets are filed invoking Section 173(2). Learned counsel would contend that no material is collected in respect of Rajarajeshwarinagar and Trial Court given reasons while passing such an order. The counsel would vehemently contend that judgment of this Court in coming to the conclusion that stand alone charge-sheet can be filed on single FIR becomes per incuriam, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in VINAY TYAGI's case and the same was not referred.
45. In reply to this argument, learned SPP for the petitioner-State would contend that dropping of the case is not sustainable in the eye of law and the same is not recognized,
260
once the discharge applications are dismissed and thereafter, charges are also framed and even in some of the cases, trial has been commenced and without appreciation of the evidence and completion of the same, the conclusion of the trial of the prosecution is erroneous. He would contend that order on discharge application was passed not at the instance of the accused and dropping of proceedings suo moto by the Trial Court is erroneous. He would further contend that there is no question of no de novo, as there was no such de novo investigation as contended by Sri R. Swaroop Anand, learned counsel. He also contends that VINAY TYAGI's case is not applicable and TVCC report can be relied upon by the prosecution, even producing secondary evidence before the Court. He would contend that the Police are not having any competence cannot be reagitated again, since this Court in the earlier judgment referred by him, particularly in paragraph No.36 answered the same and once again, they cannot raise the very same objection. He also further submits that TVCC report is only a preliminary enquiry report before initiating the proceedings and the same is not the main material relied upon by the prosecution. Hence, the very
261
contention of learned counsel for the respondents cannot be accepted.
46. Learned SPP for the petitioner-State also filed a memo dated 25.02.2025 providing details in respect of 145 prosecution cases, wherein it is stated that in some of the cases, prosecution sanction is not applicable and in some of the cases, sanction is given in respect of some of the respondents, particularly in respect of accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crl.R.P.No.1714/2023. So also in Crl.R.P.No.663/2024, sanction is given in respect of accused Nos.1 to 9, except accused No.5- B.T. Ramesh. In Crl.R.P.No.544/2024, sanction is given in respect of accused Nos.1 to 4, 6 and 7 and rejected in respect of accused No.5. In Crl.R.P.No.966/2024, sanction is given in respect of accused Nos.1 to 3 and so also in
Crl.R.P.No.1546/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.3 and 7, in Crl.R.P.No.1013/2024, sanction is pending against accused No.1 and sanction is given against accused Nos.2 and 3. In Crl.R.P.No.976/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.1, 3, 7 and 8 and so also in Crl.R.P.No.1020/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.1 and 3, 7 and 8 and sanction is given
262
against accused No.3 in Crl.R.P.No.1298/2024. In Crl.R.P.No.967/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.2, 3, 6 and 7 and rejected against accused Nos.1 and 5. In Crl.R.P.No.486/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.1, 3 and 7 and so also in Crl.R.P.No.961/2024, sanction is given against accused Nos.1 to 3 and 6 to 8 and rejected only against accused No.5-B.T. Ramesh. In respect of other cases also, details are given as regards sanction and rejection against the respective accused. Hence, he would contend that in view of granting sanction, after quashing of proceedings, liberty was given to move the same Court having obtained the sanction and to continue the proceedings against them, in view of sanction given. He would further contend that, if sanction was not granted, question of continuing the proceedings does not arise. However, this Court while passing an order quashing the proceedings also, liberty was given and even time frame was fixed to consider the sanction. When such being the case, the very contention of learned counsel for the respondents cannot be accepted and the order passed by the Trial Court suo moto requires to be set aside by allowing revision petitions, since order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
263
47. Having heard learned SPP for the petitioner-State and respective counsels appearing for the respective respondents and also the principles laid down in the judgments referred supra by the respective counsels, the points that would arise for consideration of this Court are:
(1) Whether the Trial Court, in all the cases, committed an error in passing the impugned order in coming to the conclusion that charge- sheets filed against the respondents/accused are not sustainable in the eye of law invoking Sections 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C. without any application by suo moto and whether it requires interference of this Court by exercising revisional jurisdiction?
(2) What order?
Point No.(1)
48. Having heard learned SPP for the petitioner-State and respective counsels appearing for the respective respondents, the moot question that arises for consideration before this Court is whether the Trial Court committed an error in discharging the respective accused persons in all the cases invoking Section 227 and 239 Cr.P.C. and the same is contrary to evidence and material on record. It is important to note that
264
the Trial Court has passed an order on sustainability of the charge-sheet after commencement of the trial in some of the cases and in some of the cases, charges have been framed and no dispute with regard to the fact that in some of the cases, witnesses have been examined and charges are also framed and discharge applications are also dismissed. It is also important to note that the Trial Court while discharging the accused persons mainly comes to the conclusion that the prosecution has failed to produce the original TVCC report and the same is very much necessary to prove the case of the prosecution, as the complaint was registered only on the basis of the TVCC report. It is also the contention of learned SPP for the petitioner-State that Trial Court has committed an error in discharging the accused persons for the reason that original TVCC report is not produced. No doubt, order sheet discloses that direction was given to produce TVCC report and though contend that the same is available in some of the cases, the same was not found in the said file also.
49. It is important to note that, no doubt, FIR was registered based on the TVCC report, since there was preliminary enquiry conducted by the authority against the respondents/accused, who were entrusted with the work of
265
allotting, overseeing and checking the civil work undertaken by the BBMP in respect of asphalting of roads, construction of drains and the allegation against the accused is that not properly held any periodical inspections, in order to assess the progress of civil work and quality of the civil work undertaken, helped the private civil contractors in drawing the contract amount which was far more than what was agreed upon. Further, the allegations against the accused persons are that these accused persons hatched a criminal conspiracy with a sole intention of causing huge loss to the State exchequer and they helped the civil private contractors to collect the said amount by creating, concocting and fabricating documents only with a view to help them to cheat the Government.
50. It is also important to note that offences invoked are under Section 120B IPC-criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust under Section 409 IPC and fabrication of document and using the same as genuine document and also invoked Sections 465, 468 and 477A IPC and Sections 13(1)(c)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, since the accused persons indulged in causing loss to State exchequer in connivance with the private contractors causing huge loss to the
266
State exchequer. It is also important to note that TVCC report is only a preliminary report before initiation of the proceedings and thereafter, case was registered and matter was entrusted to special body to investigate the matter and it is also not in dispute that stand alone charge-sheets are filed before the Trial Court.
51. It is important to note that very initiation of proceedings was challenged before this Court in W.P.Nos.7246- 7250/2013 and connected petitions. This Court, vide order dated 26.09.2013, when the issues were raised with regard to competency of the Police Station and registration of one FIR and filing of several charge-sheets, a question was raised whether BMTF has authority to register the cases for the offence in Crime No.4/2011 and to investigate the same and the fact that Crime No.4/2011 is only the FIR which is registered is not in dispute. It is also important to note that in these writ petitions, question was raised whether transfer of investigation in Crime No.4/2011 from BMTF to CID by the Government was competent and also point was framed with regard to nature of accusations made in various charge-sheets filed by CID against the public servants, whether the bar created under Section 197 of Cr.P.C. is
267
attracted, if so, whether the learned Magistrate is justified in taking cognizance of the offences alleged and ordering issue of summons against the public servants involved in those cases and the fact that cognizance is taken is not in dispute and also this Court has taken note of proceedings of the Government of Karnataka for creation of Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force vide Government order dated 19.03.1996 and sanction was accorded to constitute a force to be called Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force was also taken note. This Court also taken note of notification dated 27.05.1996, Government order dated 28.08.1997 and the notification dated 02.09.2002, Government Order dated 17.11.2004 and proceedings of Government of Karnataka dated 02.02.2013 and so also, notification issued by Home Secretary dated 06.02.2013. Having considered all these material, including Section 2(s) of Cr.P.C. which defines 'Police Station' as well as Section 154 Cr.P.C., also taken note of the judgment of the Apex Court in ASHOK KUMAR TODI's case referring the definition of word 'investigation' found in Section 2(h) of Cr.P.C. and relied upon paragraph No.48 of the judgment.
268
52. Apart from that, in detail discussed in paragraph No.30 while answering point No.1 with regard to competency of the Police to investigate the matter and file the charge-sheet. This Court also while considering Point No.2 also taken note of transferring the case from BMTF to CID and answered the same that there was no error in passing such an order and so also relied upon paragraph No.49 of the judgment of ASHOK KUMAR TODI's case, particularly paragraph No.36 of the order of this Court which reads as hereunder:
"36) As noticed supra, it is the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that CID Police had no jurisdiction to file the charge sheet before the jurisdictional Magistrate since they were directed by the Government to submit a report to the Government, as such, the charge sheets filed are without jurisdiction. I find no substance in this contention. The Government in exercise of its power of superintendence over the Police Force and having regard to the seriousness of the allegations made involving huge sums of public money, transferred the investigation to CID Police. Of course, in the notification, the CID was directed to complete the investigation at an early date and take steps to submit the report to the Government. This direction in my considered opinion, does not come in the way
269
of the power of the CID Police as officers-in-charge of the police station to file final report in terms of Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. on completion of investigation. The Government notification does not preclude the CID Police from exercising the power vested in the Investigating Officer to file final report under Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. to the jurisdictional court. In every case registered in respect of cognizable offences under Section 154 of Cr.P.C., the officer-in-charge of the police station having jurisdiction to investigate, is empowered to proceed with the investigation and on completion of investigation to form opinion as to whether on the materials collected, there is a case to place the accused before the Magistrate for trial and if so, to take necessary steps for the same by filing a charge sheet under Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. The Apex Court in Ashok Kumar Todi's case referred to supra, in Paragraph-49 has set-out various steps contemplated by Code of Criminal Procedure to be carried-out during investigation, which reads as under:-
49. The Code contemplates the following to be carried-out during such steps investigation:-
i) proceeding to the spot;
ii) ascertainment of the facts and circumstances of the case;
270
iii) discovery and arrest of the suspected offender;
iv) collection of evidence relating to the commission of the offence which may consist of-
a) The examination of various persons (including the accused) and the reduction of their statements into writing, if the officer thinks fit,
b) The search of places or seizure of things considered necessary for the investigation and to be produced at the trial; and
v) formation of opinion as to whether on the material collected there is a case to place the accused before a Magistrate for trial and, if so, to take necessary steps for the same by filing of charge sheet under Section 173."
Therefore, in the light of the above, it cannot be said that the CID Police had no competence to file charge sheet under Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C. Having regard to the fact that the Government transferred the investigation to CID police, the CID police assumed the status of officer-in-charge of the police empowered to take all necessary steps as contemplated by the Code regarding investigation of the case including the power to form final opinion and to place the charge sheet before the
271
jurisdictional court. Merely because, in the notification issued by the Government, CID was directed to submit a report to the Government, it cannot be interpreted that the CID police had no jurisdiction to file the charge sheet in terms of Section 173(2) of Cr.P.C.. The direction so contained in notification will have to be construed as a direction to CID to submit a status report to the Government as to the action taken by it in respect of the investigation of the case entrusted to it. In this view of the matter, I find no substance in the said contention and accordingly, it is rejected".
53. This Court also would like to rely upon paragraph No.37 of the order, wherein also considered the fact that CID filed multiple charge-sheets, as the respondents once again had raised the very same objection. Hence, this Court would like to extract paragraph No.37 of the judgment passed by this Court, which reads as hereunder:
"37) Yet another argument which calls for consideration is about C.I.D filing multiple charge sheets. There is no statutory provisions which curtails the power of the Investigating Officer to file multiple charge sheets. As noticed supra, the allegations made in the FIR were general in nature. Without mentioning the names of any of the
272
officials/officers/person in the FIR, it was generally stated that there is large scale defalcation of the funds of BBMP on the basis of the forged, fabricated and created documents and the entire matter requires a detailed investigation. It was for that reason only, the case was registered against the persons to be identified as accused. The investigation relate to a long period from 2005-06 upto 2011-12 in respect of different Engineering Divisions. The illegalities and irregularities alleged, covers large number of officials and officers apart from Civil Contractors. Therefore, having regard to the above facts and circumstances, it cannot be expected that the CID should file a single charge sheet, On the other hand, on completion of investigation as regards particular work during a particular period, the CID has filed charge sheets against those officers/officials/contractors involved in such work. Therefore, I find no illegalities or irregularities in CID filing multiple charge sheets. In fact, according to the learned Advocate General, as on today, the Investigating Officer is able to complete the investigation in respect of certain works only since it involves examination of large amount of records, registers, etc. and therefore, very few charge sheets have been filed and many more charge sheets are expected to be filed, as and when the investigation progresses."
273
54. With regard to the contention raised by the respondents/accused as regards filing of multiple charge-sheets is concerned, already there was an order passed by this Court. It is also important to note that order passed by this Court in the above writ petitions connected with other writ petitions was challenged before the Apex Court and the Apex Court affirmed the order is not in dispute and the respondents once again cannot raise the very same issue since, it has attained its finality with regard to competency as well as filing of multiple charge- sheets, based on single FIR is concerned. It is also important to note that scope of revision under Section 227 and 239 Cr.P.C. is very limited. Admittedly, some of the accused have filed the application for discharge earlier and no dispute with regard to the fact that same are dismissed. In the case on hand, the Trial Court proceeded suo moto invoking Sections 227 and 239 Cr.P.C. voluntarily interdicting the proceedings in the absence of the application.
55. This Court would like to rely upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (1979) 2 SCC 179 in the case of
RATILAL BHANJI MITHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
274
AND OTHERS, wherein it is held that 'discharge' and 'acquittal' are distinct concepts, after framing of charge there cannot be a 'discharge' but only an 'acquittal' based on a finding of not guilty turning on the merits of the case, hence High Court could rightfully interfered in revision under Section 439 with an order of discharge passed after the framing of the charge, and order retrial, High Court was not barred by plea of autre fois acquit under Section 403(1) Cr.P.C., 1973, Sections 239 to 249 and 401 and 300 was also considered by the Court. Once a charge is framed in a warrant case, instituted either on complaint or a police report, the Magistrate has no power under the Code to discharge the accused, and thereafter, he can either acquit or convict the accused unless he decides to proceed under Sections 349 and 562 of the Code of 1892 (which correspond to Sections 325 and 360 of the Code of 1973) and the same is discussed in paragraph No.28 and the Apex Court in paragraph No.27 held that Section 253(1) shows that as a general rule there can be no order of discharge unless the evidence of all the prosecution witnesses has been taken and the Magistrate considers for reasons to be recorded, in the light of the evidence, that no case has been made out. Sub-section (2) which authorizes the
275
Magistrate to discharge the accused at any previous stage of the case if he considers the charge to be groundless, is an exception to that rule. A discharge without considering the evidence taken is illegal. It is also held in paragraph No.30 of the judgment that if after framing charge the Magistrate whimsically, without appraising the evidence and without permitting the prosecution to produce all its evidence, 'discharges' the accused, such an acquittal, without trial, even if clothed as 'discharge', will be illegal. The Apex Court also in paragraph No.35, held that assuming arguendo, the Magistrate's order of discharge was an order of 'acquittal', then also, it does not alter the fact that this 'acquittal' was manifestly illegal. It was not passed on merits, but without any trial, without consequent failure of justice. The High Court has undoubtedly the power to interfere with such a patently illegal order of acquittal in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under Section 439, and direct a retrial.
56. Having considered the principles laid down in the judgment of this Court and also considering the factual aspects of the case, after framing of charge and also recording of evidence of witnesses in some of the cases, the Trial Court proceeded to interdict in the midst of the proceedings which is
276
unknown to law and ought to have considered the same after recording the evidence of prosecution by allowing the prosecution to place all the materials before the Court. Hence, the very act of the Trial Court is illegal. Having perused the reasons assigned by the Trial Court while interdicting the proceedings, taken note of order passed by this Court passed in
W.P.NO.19480 OF 2022 dated 29.03.2023 in the case of
T.P.MUNNINARAYANAPPA VS. STATE BY KARNATAKA
LOKAYUKTA that there must be a separate complaint and FIR. Having considered this judgment, already in respect of these particular cases are concerned, similar issue was raised before this Court and this Court already taken note of the same and extracted paragraph Nos.36 and 37 of the order passed by this Court and the same has been challenged before the Apex Court and it was affirmed by the Apex Court. When such being the case, the Trial Court committed an error in relying upon this judgment. In this regard, similar contention was taken and the same was rejected and Apex Court also, affirmed the said judgment and it has attained its finality. Hence, the Trial Court ought not to have relied upon the said judgment and the factual
277
aspect of the said case is on a different footing and a different subject.
57. The Trial Court also considered the evidence of P.W.1 and also the document which was marked as Ex.P1 and ought not to have discussed the same, when the matter was challenged before this Court and confirmed by the Apex Court and also taken note of Ex.P1 marked in Special Case No.467/2014 and considered the evidence of P.W.2 and also Ex.P3 and discussed the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 and the very procedure adopted by the Trial Court is erroneous, unless allow all the witnesses on behalf of the prosecution to lead evidence and place on record the material and ought not to have discarded the same, in view of the judgment referred supra, wherein it is categorically held that prosecution ought to have been allowed to place all the material before the Court and discussed the evidence of P.W.2 that evidence of P.W.2 helps the Court to come to a conclusion as of now original TVCC report is not before the Court and appreciation of the evidence of P.Ws.1 and 2 of that case are looked into, it is the primary documents on which all 145 charge-sheets have been submitted before the Court. The true copies of which are filed as Exs.P2 and P3 in
278
that case. When such documents are placed and marked as Exs.P2 and P3, only comes to the conclusion that original is not placed. When the document has already been marked as Exs.P2 and P3, whether the same is admissible or reliable or if any attempt is made to place the secondary evidence before the Court and also prosecution got an opportunity to place secondary evidence also, even if Exs.P2 and P3 are marked and the same would be considered in further proceedings of those cases and instead of allowing the prosecution to place either the original or secondary evidence before the Court, the Trial Court hurriedly interdicted the proceedings in passing such an order. It is also the contention that it is only preliminary report before initiation of proceedings as contended by learned SPP and prosecution not only placed reliance only on the TVCC report, but other material is also collected and ought to have given opportunity to the prosecution to place on record the material and instead of giving an opportunity to the prosecution, committed an error and the judgment referred supra is very clear that once trial has been commenced, it means, it has to end with an acquittal and not of discharge and the very reasoning given by the Trial Court is erroneous interdicting the
279
proceedings without allowing the prosecution to place the material before the Court with regard to the charges leveled against them.
58. It is also settled law that the Apex Court in the judgment reported in (2023) 12 SCC 735 in the case of
CHANDI PULIYA VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL, while considering Section 300(1) r/w. Section 227 and 228, plea of double jeopardy and proper stage for considering the stage of discharge i.e., prior to framing of charge, clarified the law that the stage of discharge under Section 227 is a stage prior to framing of the charge under Section 228 and it is at that stage alone that the Court can consider the application under Section 300, because once the Court rejects the discharge application, it would proceed to framing of charge under Section 228, resultantly, considering entire legal position, matter remitted to Trial Court to consider the application under Section 300(1) along with discharge application to pass appropriate orders on framing of the charge under Section 228, in case the objection/defence under Section 300(1) is overruled and Trial Court is satisfied that there is sufficient grounds for framing of charge against the accused. In paragraph No.5.1 also, the Apex
280
Court held that the Courts below have failed to appreciate that the present proceedings arise from the discharge proceedings and that the stage of discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C. precedes the stage of framing of charge under Section 228 Cr.P.C. and also taken note of the judgment reported in (1979)
2 SCC 179 in the case of RATILAL BHANJI MITHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, wherein also it is held that once the charges are framed, the accused is disentitled from praying for discharge. It is also held that, once the Court rejects the discharge application, it would proceed to framing of charge under Section 228 Cr.P.C. In the case on hand, it is not in dispute that the earlier applications filed for discharge are rejected and thereafter, charges are framed in almost all cases and the same is admitted by the learned counsel for the respondents by filing a memo stating that charges are farmed in maximum number of cases. Hence, this judgment is aptly applicable to the case on hand.
59. This Court also would like to reply upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in 2008 (4) MH.L.J. 347
in the case of PRAMOD NARAYAN BANDEKAR AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, wherein also the
281
Apex Court discussed with regard to scope of Section 227 and
239 Cr.P.C. In the said judgment, considered the judgment of the Apex Court in RATILAL BHANJI MITHANI's case, wherein it is held that once the charge is framed, the Magistrate has no power under Section 227 of Criminal Procedure Code or any other provision of the Code to cancel the charge and reverse the proceedings and discharge the accused.
60. This Court also would like to rely upon the judgment reported in (2008) 10 SCC 109 in the case of BHARAT
PARIKH VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND
ANOTHER, wherein also the earlier judgment of RATILAL BHANJI MITHANI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA is followed and the Apex Court also held that once a charge is framed, the Magistrate has no power under Section 227 or any other provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure to cancel such charge and to discharge the accused. It is also observed that once charge has been framed and the accused pleads not guilty, the Magistrate is required to proceed with the trial to its logical end. In other words, once a charge is framed in a warrant case instituted either on complaint or a police report, the Magistrate has no power under the Code to discharge the accused. He can,
282
thereafter, either acquit or convict the accused. But, in the case on hand, the learned Magistrate had committed an error in interdicting the proceedings and not allowing the prosecution to proceed further and place on record the material which have been collected during the course of investigation simply relying upon some of the witnesses, who have been examined and suo moto proceeded to discharge the accused without any application and the same is unknown to law as against the principles laid down in the judgment referred supra as well as criminal procedure code not permits the Magistrate to proceed in such a manner.
61. This Court also would like to rely upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2020) 2 SCC 768 in the case of
M.E. SHIVALINGAMURTHY VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, BENGALURU, wherein the Apex Court held that while deciding a discharge petition, only materials brought on record by prosecution (both in form of oral statement and documents) have to be considered and the defence of the accused cannot be looked into. In the case on hand also, not at the time of discharge and order was passed having considered incomplete evidence of prosecution and interdicted the
283
proceedings. The Apex Court also in the judgment in paragraph No.18 held that defence of the accused is not to be looked into at the stage when the accused seeks to be discharged under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The Code does not give any right to the accused to produce any document at the stage of framing of the charge. At the stage of framing of the charge, the submission of the accused is to be confined to the material produced by the police. In the case on hand, already material has been considered by the Court and rejected the discharge application and even proceeded to record the evidence of prosecution, but at this juncture, invoked Sections 227 and 239 Cr.P.C. and the same is not permissible. In this judgment also, in paragraph No.28, the Apex Court held that, again it becomes necessary that we remind ourselves of the contours of the jurisdiction under Section 227 Cr.P.C. The principle established is to take the materials produced by the prosecution, both in the form of oral statements and also documentary material, and act upon it without it been subjected to questioning through cross- examination and everything assumed in favour of the prosecution, if a scenario emerges where no offence, as alleged, is made out against the accused, it, undoubtedly, would enure to
284
the benefit of the accused warranting the Trial Court to discharge the accused.
62. This Court also would like to rely upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in (2021) 11 SCC 191 in the case of
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. ASHOK KUMAR KASHYAP,
wherein also discussion was made with regard to scope of Sections 227 and 228, wherein reiterated, at the stage of Section 227, Judge has merely to sift evidence in order to find out whether or not there is sufficient ground for proceeding against accused. In the cases on hand, Trial Court even proceeded to record the evidence and while examining some of the witnesses, invoked Section 228 Cr.P.C. and the same is not permissible and even though original document i.e., TVCC report is not placed before the Trial Court and if the prosecution is not permitted to produce the secondary evidence before the Court, then it will be fatal to the case of the prosecution and after allowing prosecution to lead complete evidence, the Court can either admit the evidence or discard the evidence, but the same was to be done after consideration of the material on merits not in the midst of the proceedings, that too, while recording the evidence of prosecution witnesses and the Trial Court interdicted
285
the proceedings on the ground that original TVCC report is not produced and the same is not the stage to consider the said fact and even the Court can draw an adverse inference, if such report was not placed before the Court while considering the matter on merits and not at the midst of the proceedings and the very approach of the Trial Court is erroneous.
63. The learned counsel Sri Parameshwar N. Hegde, who appears for some of the respondents in terms of the chart provided to this Court, would mainly contend that the Apex Court in its judgment in the case of Nanjappa (supra) has held that validity of sanction could be raised at any stage of the proceedings. It is also held that competency of the Court against the accused depends upon the existence of valid sanction. If the trial proceeds despite the invalid sanction or absence of sanction, the same shall be deemed to be non-est. There is no dispute that without the sanction, the Court cannot proceed against the Government officials and with regard to the validity is concerned, the same could be considered during the course of trial and unless the evidence has been recorded, the validity of the sanction cannot be decided and the law is settled in the recent judgment of the Apex Court in the case of
286
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND OTHERS v.
PRAMILA VIRENDRA KUMAR AGARWAL AND ANOTHER
reported in (2020) 17 SCC 664. The learned counsel also relied upon the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.8362/2021 and other connected matters (supra), wherein this Court while considering the matter though quashed the proceedings on the ground of no sanction, liberty was reserved to the prosecution to obtain and place on record a valid sanction from the competent authority before the concerned Court and on such production, the concerned Court is at liberty to continue the prosecution from the stage of taking cognizance and even time bound direction was given to consider the sanction application within three months. That means to continue the proceedings with sanction.
64. The learned counsel also relied upon the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.56754/2018 (supra), wherein the proceedings was quashed and it was made clear that the observations made in the course of the order is restricted to the consideration of the case of the petitioner alone and cannot be paraphrased to any other accused. The trial, if any, pending against any other accused shall be considered by the competent
287
Court without being influenced by the observations or the findings in the case at hand. Hence, it is very clear that the proceedings could be continued and trial must go on without being influenced by the observations made by this Court while quashing. These judgments will not come to the aid of the respondents having considered the factual aspects of this case.
65. The learned counsel Sri Vijaya Kumar appearing for some of the respondents in his arguments relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Satish Mehra
(supra), wherein it is held that power to quash proceedings after charges were framed is wider as evidence adduced while submitting of charge sheet can be looked into for determining disclosure of offence against accused. Where allegations do not disclose prima facie case and prosecution of accused would result in abuse of process then proceedings can be quashed either at early stage or at later stage. This extraordinary power available to High Court needs to be exercised carefully and sparingly. In the case on hand, not only relied upon the TVCC report, other materials are also placed before the Trial Court. The Trial Court rejected the discharge application earlier and after rejection of the discharge application when the trial was
288
commenced, interdicted the proceedings and hence this judgment will not come to the aid of the respondents. No doubt, there is no dispute with regard to the sanction is concerned under Sections 19 and 197 of the PC Act as contended by the learned counsel in the case of Labh Singh (supra) and sanction can be obtained and proceedings can be continued in accordance with law. The learned counsel also relied upon the order of this Court passed in W.P.NO.18890/2022 and connected matters (supra), and though the writ petitions were allowed, only taking of cognizance was quashed and liberty was given and time bound period also fixed for getting the sanction.
66. The learned counsel for the State has also produced the chart for having given the sanction and rejection details are also given. No doubt, the learned counsel for the respondent relies upon Annexure-R2 total rejection of the sanction in respect of the respondent Sri B.T. Ramesh, retired Chief Engineer and Sri B.G. Prakash Kumar, retired Executive Engineer and when the sanction was not given, there cannot be any proceedings against those persons. If sanctions are given, the same could be considered by the Trial Court.
289
67. The learned counsel Sri R. Swaroop Anand in his arguments relied upon the statement of objections and Annexures-R1 to R11 and would contend that FIR was registered based on the complaint of one of the officials of BBMP, Sri B.F. Patil on 04.11.2011 and after the investigation conducted by the CID, charge-sheet was filed and also not disputes the fact that cognizance was taken. The learned counsel contend that the original TVCC report is not produced. The learned counsel relies upon the evidence of P.W.1 and P.W.2 and there is no reference to any other BBMP Ward number expect 32 and 205 and mainly relies upon the evidence of the witnesses and this Court has already formed the opinion that in the midst of the proceedings, the Trial Court cannot interdict the proceedings without following the procedure. This Court has already relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ratilal Bhanji Mithani (supra), which has been followed by the Apex Court consistently and recently in 2023, in the case of Chandi Puliya (supra), the Apex Court held that after framing of the charge, there cannot be an interdicting of the proceedings.
290
68. The learned counsel in support of his arguments also relied upon several judgments and this Court already dealt with the issue by referring the judgments of the Apex Court from 1979 to 2023. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Vinay Tyagi (supra), with regard to the investigation, further investigation and de novo investigation is concerned. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari (supra), wherein it is held that registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 of the Code, if cognizable offence has taken place and no dispute with regard to the said principle is concerned the word used is 'shall' in Section 154(1) of Cr.P.C. and registration of FIR is mandatory. In the case on hand, registration of FIR is not in dispute, but only based on that FIR, standalone charge-sheet has been filed before the Court and the said issue has been considered by this Court in the earlier judgment and the same has attained its finality and the same cannot be re-opened by raising the same issue that too during the trial.
69. The learned counsel also relied upon the order passed by the Apex Court in CIVIL APPEAL No.20982/2017
291
and connected matters (supra), and particularly relying upon the principles of "per incuriam" would contend that the earlier judgment is "per incuriam" and brought to the notice of this Court paragraph No.147(e) of the said judgment, wherein discussion was made with regard to the case of Narmada Bachao Andolan (III) v. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in AIR 2011 SC 1989 and also larger Bench decision of the Apex Court in the case of Sant Lal Gupta v. Modern Coop. Societies Ltd., reported in (2010) 13 SCC 336, wherein it is held that if the latter bench wants to take a different view than that taken by the earlier bench, the proper course is for it to refer the matter to a larger bench.
70. In the case on hand, after filing of the charge-sheet, cognizance was taken and charges are also framed and even the evidence also commenced in some of the cases by examining the witnesses and instead of considering the matter on merits, interdicted the proceedings and hence the very contention of the learned counsel that the Trial Court rightly considered the material on record cannot be appreciated and the issue was already attained finality questioning the same before this Court
292
and the Apex Court and once it attained finality, cannot be questioned.
71. The learned counsel Sri Shanti Bhushan appearing for the respondent in some of the cases relied upon several judgments with regard to the validity of filing of multiple charge- sheet and one FIR and also non-production of original TVCC report and discharge after rejection of earlier application with regard to the legality of the discharge order relied upon several judgments and contend that the Trial Court exercised the discretion under Sections 227 and 239 of Cr.P.C. after carefully examining the material on record. The learned counsel contend that primary evidence was not produced and this Court already made an observation that even if primary evidence is not produced before the Court, the Court can rely upon the secondary evidence and no such opportunity was given to the prosecution even to rely upon the secondary evidence. The fact that already true copy of the TVCC report was marked without any objections is not in dispute and whether the same is admissible or not, the same could be considered while considering the matter on merits.
293
72. This Court would like to rely upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of VIJAY v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS reported in 2023 Live Law (SC) 1022, wherein it is discussed with regard to Sections 61, 63 and 65 of the Evidence Act and the principles relevant for examining the admissibility of secondary evidence. Section 65 of the Evidence Act reads as follows:
"65. Cases in which secondary evidence relating to documents may be given - Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition or contents of a document in the following cases-
(a) When the original is shown or appears to be in the possession or power of the person against whom the document is sought to be proved, or of any person out of reach of, or not subject to, the process of the Court, or of any person legally bound to produce it, and when, after the notice mentioned in Section 66, such a person does not produce it;
(b) when the existence, condition or contents of the original have been proved to be admitted in writing by the person against whom it is proved or by his representative in interest;
(c) when the original has been destroyed or lost, or when the party offering evidence of its
294
contents cannot, for any other reason not arising from his own default or neglect, produce it in reasonable time;
(d) when the original is of such a nature as not to be easily movable;
(e) when the original is a public document within the meaning of Section 74;
(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted by this Act, or by any other law in force in India to be given in evidence under Section 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act;
(g) when the originals consist of numerous accounts or other documents which cannot conveniently be examined in Court, and the fact to be proved is the general result of the whole collection.
In cases (a), (c) and (d), any secondary evidence of the contents of the document is admissible."
73. The Apex Court in the case of Vijay (supra) in paragraph No.31 relied upon the Constitution Bench judgment in the case Cement Corporation of India Ltd. v. Purya reported in (2004) 8 SCC 270, wherein it is held that as the former being evidence that the law requires to be given first, the latter
295
being evidence that may be given in the absence of that original evidence when a proper explanation of its absence has been given.
74. Having considered the principles laid down in the judgment, the Trial Court ought to have given an opportunity to the prosecution to place the secondary evidence and without giving an opportunity to the prosecution, interdicted the proceedings in a hurried manner and even not allowed the prosecution to examine and place all the material before the Trial Court and the same is erroneous. Having considered these materials, the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel Sri Shanti Bhushan in the case of T.T.Antony (supra) is not helpful to the case of the respondents, wherein it is held that there can be no second FIR and no fresh investigation on receipt of every subsequent information in respect of the same cognizable offence or same occurrence giving rise to one or more cognizable offence as contended by the learned counsel for the respondents.
75. In the case on hand, FIR is registered, but multiple charge-sheets are filed in view of the investigation conducted by
296
the Investigation Officer i.e., by CID and standalone charge- sheets are filed and factual aspects of the each case is very similar. In all the cases, allegations are similar that of conspiracy and awarding the work to the contractors and misappropriation of funds and causing of loss of the State exchequer. Hence, the very contention of the learned counsel cannot be accepted. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Bhajan Lal (supra) and the said judgment will not come to the aid of the respondents having considered the factual aspects of the case and there is no any second FIR.
76. The learned counsel also relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of STATE OF ORISSA v. DEBENDRANATH PADHI reported in (2005) 1 SCC 568, wherein it is held that summons to produce document or other thing, the accused cannot at the stage of framing of charge invoke Section 91 of Cr.P.C. to seek production of any document to prove his innocence. The Apex Court also discussed the expression "the record of the case" as used in Section 227 of Cr.P.C. But in the case on hand, 227 applications are rejected and subsequently no such application was filed. The Trial Court
297
suo motu invoked Sections 227 and 239 and interdicted the proceedings and while discharging the accused, the Trial Court cannot look into the contention or defence of the accused, but the Court invoked the jurisdiction of Sections 227 and 239 considering the defence and law is settled that defence cannot be taken note of while discharging the accused. Only the material collected by the Investigating Officer should be taken note of while invoking discharge jurisdiction.
77. In the case on hand, charge-sheets are filed and cognizance was taken, even charges are framed and trial has been commenced in some of the case. The learned Trail Judge relied upon the evidence of half baked meal of the prosecution and not allowed to complete the process of full baked meal by recording the evidence of the prosecution witnesses and interdicted the proceedings considering the grounds urged by the accused persons in the absence of any application for discharge. The procedure adopted by the Trial Court is unknown to law. I have already pointed out that the mode adopted by the Trial Court is erroneous. I have already considered the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ratilal Bhanji Mithani (supra)
298
and this judgment was followed through out till date regarding invoking of Sections 239 to 249, 401 and 300 of Cr.P.C. It is also held that 'discharge' and 'acquittal' are distinct concepts. After framing of charge, there cannot be a 'discharge', but only an 'acquittal' based on a finding of not guilty turning on the merits of the case. It is also held that the High Court could rightfully interfere in revision under Section 439 with an order of discharge passed after the framing of charge, and order re-trial.
78. Having considered the factual aspects of the case, the material on record and the principles laid down in the judgments referred by the State as well as the learned counsel for the respondents and the judgments referred by this Court, no doubt, there is no dispute that when there was no sanction, there cannot be any continuation of proceedings as contemplated under Section 197 as well as Section 19 of PC Act. I have already pointed out that the High Court quashed the proceedings and liberty was reserved to the State to proceed against the accused persons to obtain the sanction and time bound direction was given to consider the sanction. The State also placed on record the sanction given in some of the cases and also rejection in some of the cases as contended by the
299
respondents counsel. When such being the case, the Trial Court committed an error in interdicting the proceedings without allowing the prosecution to lead further evidence including secondary evidence as observed above as well as only non- production of original TVCC report, the proceedings was interdicted and the procedure adopted by the Trial Court is unknown to law. Hence, it requires interference of this Court by exercising the revisional jurisdiction. Hence, I answer the point in the affirmative in coming to the conclusion that the matter requires to be interfered with by this Court by exercising the revisional jurisdiction and this Court has already made a chart above in respect of cases in which the accused persons have been discharged in interdicting the proceedings.
79. In view of the discussions made above, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) All the criminal revision petitions are allowed.
(ii) The order passed by the Trial Court in all the cases are set aside. The matters are remitted back to the Trial Court to consider the matter afresh in view of the observations made by this Court on merits.
300
(iii) The Trial Court is directed to consider the sanction order given by the State to continue the proceedings against the accused where the proceedings have already been quashed by giving liberty to file sanction order and continue to proceed against them from the stage of taking cognizance.
(iv) If no such sanction is given in respect of the accused persons, which have been relied upon by the respondents, there cannot be any proceedings against those accused persons.
(v) In the absence of original TVCC report, if any secondary evidence is placed, if the same is admissible and reliable as observed by the Apex Court in the judgment referred supra, the Trial Court is directed to permit the prosecution to place on record all the material recording the evidence of witnesses both oral and documentary evidence in full and then dispose of the matter on merits in accordance with law.
Sd/-
(H.P. SANDESH)
JUDGE
SN/ST/MD
301

Comments