Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Attorney(S)
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Cheela Ashok v. The State of Telangana

    [ 3168 I

    HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

    AT HYDERABAD

    (Special Original Jurisdiction)

    MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JUNE

    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR

    PRESENT

    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

    WRIT PETITIo N NO: 14277 OF 2024 Between:

    ANO

    Cheela Ashok, S/o. Late.Cheela Bhoomaiah, Aged 65Years, Occ. Business H.No.g-zzrz,Asnofa Mansion, Rajarajeshwari Nagar,old Bowenpally, Hyderabad..

    ...pETlIoNER

    '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary'Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

    2. The District C6llector, Kamareddy Diskict,

    3. The Tahsildhar, Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District. ...RES'ONDENTS

    PetitionUnderArlicle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 is includedthe petitioner's land in Sy.No. 82l1tAA an extent of Ac.01.27 gts, and land in Sy No' 8411 an extent of Ac.2.32 gts, situated at Kelo.iiwadi Village Shivar of Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District in the Prohibited Property list in Dharani Porlalis totally erroneous without there being any reason and without putting the petitioner on notice is highly arbitrary and illegal violation of Article 14,21 and 300-A of the constitution of lndia and against the principles of natural iustice and consequently direct the respondenls to delete land in Sy-No. 8211lAA an extent of Ac.o1.27gts, and land in Sy.No. 84t1 an extent of Ac.2.32 gts, situated at Kelojiwadi Village Shivar of Tadwai tvlandal, Kamareddy District from prohibited property list

    1

    lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petilion, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider Online Dharani application No.2300032524. dated 04.01 .2024 and release the petitioner land in Sy No' 82t1tAA an extent of Ac.O1 .27 gts, and land in Sy.No 84/1 an extent of 4c.2.32 gts, situated at Kelojiwadi Village Shivar of Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District from the prohibited property listin the Dhrani Portal, pending disposal of the writ petition

    Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ANUGU SANJEEVA REDDY

    Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI SOMU SRINIVAS REDDY,

    AGP FOR REVENUE

    The Court made the following: ORDER

    2

    7

    HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.14277 of2024

    ORDER

    Heard Sri A.Sanjeeva Reddy, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Sri Somu Srinivas Reddy, leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondents.

    2. Petitioner is the dbsolute owner and possessor 'of the land admeasuring Ac 0l-27 gts in Sy.No.&2lllAA and Ac 2-32 gts in Sy.No.84/1, situated at Kelojiwadi Village, Shivar of Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddy District. In proof of the same, he has filed copies of latest passbook and dharani status. The said prop€rty is mentioned in the prohibited list. Therefore, the petitioner herein has filed online application vide No.2300032524, dated 04.01.2024 with respondent No.2 with a request to delete the subject property from the prohibited list. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online application, respondent No.2 did not consider the same. Therefore, the present Writ Petition.

    3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader produced written instructions from respondent No.3, wherein it is stated that his office lacks the authority to remove the properties from the prohibited list maintained bythe Registration and Stamps Departments. Respondent No.3 advised the petitioner to submit property grievance application with the District

    I

    I

    iil .l

    I -i

    2

    Collector. Howcver, the petitioner herein has already submitted online application, rcspondent No.2 will consider the same.

    4. In view of the aforesaid discussion, this Writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the aforesaid online application vide No.2300032524, dated 04.01.2024 submitted by the petitioner with a request to delete the subject property from prohibitory tist and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by putting the petitioner and all the effected parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. It respondent No.2 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons and pass a reasoned order, communicate copy of the said order to the petitioner and complete the said exercise within a period o1'eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

    As a sequel thereto, rniscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

    //TRUE COPY//

    SD/-V. HARI PRA9AD

    ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR --

    "*r,"V;.r,i.- /

    To,

    1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, T.S.,Hyderabad

    2. The District Collector, Kamareddy District,

    3. The Tahsildhar Tadwai Mandal, Kamareddv District.

    4. One CC to SRL ANUGU S4NJEEVA RED6Y, Advocare [OpUC]

    5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the Stat6 of Tellngana at Hyderabad [OUT]

    6. Two CD Copies BM BS I

    4

    HlGH COURT

    DATED:1010612024

    ORDER

    WP.No.14277 ot 2024

    DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

    WITHOUT COSTS

    \ r.. ) I'r/t D: .::iI

    t:;

    ii; 2 7 JUN 202[ t a

    e\2q

    by

    5

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Cheela Ashok v. The State of Telangana
    (Jun 10, 2024)