Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 498A, 304B, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Sections 498A, 304B, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ramu v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko

    Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:47817

    Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7603 of 2024

    Applicant :- Ramu

    Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko

    Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra,Jayveer Rajput

    Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

    Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

    1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

    2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.107 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 304B, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Purwa, District Unnao.

    3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant on 02.05.2018 and sufficient dowry was given. Subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her. The cause of death as per the postmortem report, is ante mortem hanging and apart from the ligature mark, no other injury is visible on the body of the deceased. The applicant is the father-in-law of the deceased.

    5. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.

    6. Considering the FIR as well as the postmortem and the fact that there is no specific statement against the applicant to suggest that soon before her death, the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment in relation to any demand of dowry coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 04.06.2024, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

    7. Let the applicant Ramu be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

    (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

    1

    (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

    (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

    Order Date :- 15.7.2024 akverma

    2

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ramu v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Lko
    (Jul 15, 2024)