Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 379 I.P.C. and B(1) X SC/ST Act, Police Station
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 379 I.P.C. and B(1) X SC/ST Act, Police Station
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Mohd. Naseem Hashmi v. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors

    Court No. - 45

    Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3035 of 2015

    Petitioner :- Mohd. Naseem Hashmi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Tiwari,Pravesh Kumar Rajput Counsel for Respondent :- Govt.Advocate

    Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J. Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

    Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.

    This petition has been filed by the petitioner Mohd. Naseem Hashmi with a prayer to quash the F.I.R. of case crime no. 230 of 2014 under sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 379 I.P.C. and B(1) X SC/ST Act, Police Station Jhusi, District Allahabad.

    Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the name of respondent no.4.

    From the perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that on the basis of the allegations made therein prima facie cognizable offence is made out. There is no ground for interfering in the F.I.R. Therefore, the prayer for quashing the impugned F.I.R. is refused.

    However, considering the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner that in the present case F.I.R. has been lodged on 6.6.2014 at 7.30 p.m. but the alleged incident has taken place on 18.05.2014 at 6.00 p.m. and nobody has sustained any injury. As per the F.I.R. the allegation has been raised with regard to the victim Bhagirathi Bharatiya, victim Bhagirathi Bharatiya had already lodged a complaint before the S.S.P., Allahabad. The same was enquired by Sahayak Police Adhikshak/Circle Officer 5th, Allahabad and submitted report dated 24.3.2012 to D.I.G., Allahabad that the complaint was based on Ganga pollution. It is directed that the petitioner shall not be arrested in the above mentioned case, till the credible evidence is not collected by the I.O. during investigation as per the view taken by the Apex Court in the case of Joginder Kumar Versus State of U.P. 1994 Cr.L.J.,1981.

    With the above direction this petition is finally disposed of.

    Order Date :- 5.2.2015 sherly

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Mohd. Naseem Hashmi v. State Of U.P. And 3 Ors
    (Feb 5, 2015)