Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
  • Section 11 of the Transgender Act of 2019.8.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019
  • Section 11 of the Transgender Act of 2019.8.
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The writ petitioner, who claims to be a transgender individual, filed a writ application seeking mandamus against the police authorities to allow participation in the selection process for police constables conducted by the West Bengal Police Directorate. The petitioner was originally designated male at birth but later declared herself transgender by affidavit before a Judicial Magistrate. After the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 came into force, the petitioner obtained contractual employment with the State as a female civic volunteer attached to the Maidan Police Station.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the petitioner, identifying as transgender, is entitled to participate in the police constable recruitment process under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.
  2. Whether the respondent authorities are obligated to establish a grievance redressal mechanism under Section 11 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.

Arguments of the Parties

Petitioner's Arguments

  • The petitioner relies on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, asserting that a third gender category must be recognized and allowed to participate in the recruitment process for police constables.
  • The petitioner contends that there is no grievance redressal mechanism in the State or police force to address violations of rights under the Transgender Act, specifically invoking Section 11 of the Act.

Respondent's Position

  • This information was not available in the provided opinion.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Court observed that the petitioner has been approbating and reprobating by having joined public employment as a lady civic volunteer yet now claiming transgender status to seek participation in recruitment. Based on this, the Court held that the principal reliefs sought by the petitioner cannot be granted. However, the Court acknowledged the absence of a grievance redressal mechanism as mandated by Section 11 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019, and directed the relevant police authorities and the Chief Secretary of the State to establish such mechanisms immediately to ensure compliance with the Act and provide remedies to transgender persons.

Holding and Implications

The writ petition is disposed of.

The Court denied the principal reliefs sought by the petitioner to participate in the police constable recruitment process as a transgender individual, citing the petitioner’s prior acceptance of employment as a female civic volunteer. However, it mandated the immediate establishment of a grievance redressal mechanism within the West Bengal Police and the State administration in compliance with Section 11 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. This decision directly affects the parties by refusing the petitioner's main claim but ensures institutional compliance with statutory protections for transgender persons. No new precedent was set beyond these directions.

    Pallabi Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal And Others

    Rajasekhar Mantha, J.

    1. Affidavit-of-service filed in court today be kept with the record.

    2. The writ petitioner has made a variety of prayers in the writ application. Petitioner claims to be a transgender and has sought mandamus against the police authorities to enable participation in the selection process of police constables instituted by the West Bengal Police Directorate.

    3. It appears from the annexure to the writ application that the petitioner has originally being designated as male at the time of birth. He subsequently by sworn affidavit before the Judicial Magistrate declared herself as a transgender. However, thereafter [after the enactment of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) came into force] the petitioner obtained employment with the State as a Lady called Pallabi Chakraborty and was attached to the Maidan Police Station.

    4. Counsel for the petitioner would rely upon the provisions of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 to claim that a third gender is required to be provided for and permitted to participate in the recruitment process of Constables with the State.

    5. This Court notes that the petitioner has been approbating and reprobating. Having joined public employment albeit on a contractual basis as a lady civic volunteer, the petitioner cannot be permitted to turn around and now claim the status of a transgender. The principal reliefs in the writ petition, therefore, cannot be allowed.

    6. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner refers to Section 11 of the aforesaid Act of 2019 and submits that there is no grievance redressal mechanism in the State or in the police force to redress grievances of transgender. Section 11 of the Transgender Act, 2019 is set out hereunder:-

    "11. Grievance redressal mechanism

    Every establishment shall designate a person to be a complaint officer to deal with the complaints relating to violation of the provisions of this Act."

    7. This Court directs the respondent nos. 4 & 5 to immediate set up a Grievance Redressal Mechanism and/or official in the West Bengal Police in compliance of Section 11 of the Transgender Act of 2019.

    8. The Chief Secretary of the State shall also take immediate steps to set up a Grievance Redressal Forum and Mechanism in the State in terms of Section 11 above to enable Transgender persons to have remedies under the aforesaid Transgender (Protection of Rights) Act of 2019.

    9. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

    10. There shall be no order as to costs.

    11. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertaking.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Pallabi Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal And Others
    (Feb 11, 2021)