Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • section 17(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
  • SECTION 45 A RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT 1934
  • SECTION 45 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT 1934
  • SECTION 45 I RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT
  • sub-section (2) of Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956.
  • Section 13(8)(c) of IGST Act, 2017 as under(c) Financial
  • sub-section 4 of section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017.3.
  • Section 4A of the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956.1.4
  • Rule 2(bd) of the erstwhile Services Tax Rules, 1994
  • sub-section (5) of section 16 of the NDDB Act,
  • Section 45-I(C) of the RBI Act. Besides, NDDB
  • same.7. Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 45-I(c)(i) of the RBI Act.
  • Section 17(2) of the CGST Act.6.
  • provisions of Section 465(2)(a)
  • provisions of sub-section (2),
  • provisions of section 17(2),
  • Section 17 of CGST Act.12.
  • COMPANIES ACT 2013
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • section 17(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
  • SECTION 45 A RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT 1934
  • SECTION 45 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT 1934
  • SECTION 45 I RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ACT
  • sub-section (2) of Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956.
  • Section 13(8)(c) of IGST Act, 2017 as under(c) Financial
  • sub-section 4 of section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017.3.
  • Section 4A of the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956.1.4
  • Rule 2(bd) of the erstwhile Services Tax Rules, 1994
  • sub-section (5) of section 16 of the NDDB Act,
  • Section 45-I(C) of the RBI Act. Besides, NDDB
  • same.7. Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017
  • Section 45-I(c)(i) of the RBI Act.
  • Section 17(2) of the CGST Act.6.
  • provisions of Section 465(2)(a)
  • provisions of sub-section (2),
  • provisions of section 17(2),
  • Section 17 of CGST Act.12.
  • COMPANIES ACT 2013
Smart Summary

Concise Summary of the Advance Ruling: National Dairy Development Board (NDDB)

Factual and Procedural Background

The applicant, National Dairy Development Board (NDDB), is a statutory body constituted under the National Dairy Development Board Act, 1987 (NDDB Act). NDDB's objectives include promoting dairy and other agriculture-based industries, and its activities to fulfil these objectives include technical, administrative and financial assistance.

NDDB applied for an advance ruling on whether it can be treated as a "financial institution" for the purpose of section 17(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and thus avail the option to claim, every month, an amount equal to fifty percent of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services.

Key procedural and factual points made by the applicant and recorded in the opinion include:

  • NDDB's enabling provisions in the NDDB Act explicitly authorise activities that include financing, lending and borrowing (multiple clauses quoted in the application).
  • NDDB provides term loans, short-term loans and working capital assistance, and grants loans on market-like terms, often secured against hypothecation of stock and properties.
  • NDDB had earlier been declared a "Public Financial Institution" by Government Notification SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004 under the Companies Act, 1956; saved notifications under the Companies Act, 2013 were noted.
  • The applicant submitted that GST lacks an explicit separate definition of "financial institution" for this purpose and sought clarity whether NDDB qualifies as a financial institution under GST.

The Central Goods and Services Tax, Vadodara I Commissionerate provided comments (letter dated 3.11.2017) stating that NDDB is a Public Financial Institution under the saved notification and that NDDB appears to satisfy the requirement of Section 45-I(c)(i) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; it opined NDDB could avail the 50% input tax credit option. A personal hearing was held on 07.11.2017 where Shri Hardik Shah, Chartered Accountant, appeared for the applicant.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether NDDB can be considered as a "financial institution" for the purpose of availing credit to the extent of fifty percent of input tax credit, as prescribed in Section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017?

Arguments of the Parties

Applicant's Arguments

  • NDDB Act explicitly authorises NDDB to undertake financing activities, including lending and borrowing — specific clauses were quoted (including activities described at paragraphs labeled (d), (I), (j), (k), (v), (w) in the application text).
  • NDDB conducts financing as a regular business activity, providing term loans, short-term loans and working capital assistance similar to banking companies or financial institutions in general parlance.
  • NDDB has been declared a Public Financial Institution by Notification SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004 under the Companies Act, 1956; this status remains saved under the Companies Act, 2013.
  • The applicant asserted that GST does not expressly define "financial institution" in the context of eligibility for input tax credit and that earlier narrow definitions (e.g., under services tax/cenvat rules relying on RBI Act references) should not restrict the scope under GST; NDDB believes GST's regime widens the scope to include entities engaged in financing or lending.

Revenue Department's Comments (Central GST, Vadodara I Commissionerate)

  • Confirmed NDDB was declared a Public Financial Institution by Notification SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004 and this notification is saved under the Companies Act, 2013.
  • Observed NDDB appears to satisfy the requirement contained in Section 45-I(c)(i) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (the RBI Act) and therefore may be considered a "financial institution".
  • Opined that NDDB can avail of the option under Section 17(4) of the CGST Act to claim every month an amount equal to 50% of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The Authority's analysis proceeded in a stepwise statutory interpretation and fact-application approach, as recorded in the opinion:

  1. Identification of applicant's activities and statutory powers: The Authority reviewed the NDDB Act provisions and the applicant's submissions and found that NDDB's objectives include promoting dairy and agriculture-based industries and that NDDB is authorised by statute to undertake financial assistance, including lending and borrowing money.
  2. Factual finding on NDDB's operations: The Authority noted NDDB provides various forms of loans (term, short-term, working capital) to dairy co-operatives, on terms similar to market practices and to those of banking companies/financial institutions, including secured loans.
  3. Legal question posed: Since NDDB is neither a banking company nor a non-banking financial company as per NDDB Act, the Authority posed the question whether NDDB nonetheless qualifies as a "financial institution" for the purpose of the input tax credit option in Section 17(4) CGST Act.
  4. Statutory definition located in IGST Act: The Authority observed that while the CGST Act's Section 17(4) addresses the category, the IGST Act (Section 13(8)(c)) provides that "financial institution" has the same meaning as assigned in clause (c) of Section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
  5. Examination of the RBI Act definition: The Authority examined clause (c) of Section 45-I of the RBI Act, which defines "financial institution" to include non-banking institutions that carry on, as their business or part of their business, financing activities (e.g., financing by way of making loans or advances).
  6. Application of definition to NDDB: Given NDDB's activities (making loans/advancing finance) and the statutory declaration as a Public Financial Institution by Government Notification SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004 (saved under Companies Act, 2013), the Authority concluded NDDB meets the RBI Act's definition of a "financial institution."
  7. Conclusion on eligibility under GST: On that basis, the Authority concluded NDDB is a "financial institution" for the purposes of Section 17(4) of the CGST Act and may therefore exercise the option provided therein.

Holding and Implications

Holding:

RULING: National Dairy Development Board (GSTIN 24AADCN2029C1Z5) is to be considered as "Financial Institution" for the purpose of section 17(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Implications:

  • Direct effect: NDDB is entitled to be treated as a "financial institution" under the statutory definitions applied and, therefore, can avail the option under Section 17(4) of the CGST Act to claim, every month, an amount equal to fifty percent of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services in that month (with the remainder lapsing, as per the statutory scheme).
  • Basis of decision: The decision is grounded on statutory provisions — the cross-reference in the IGST Act to the RBI Act's definition of "financial institution," and the factual finding that NDDB carries on financing activities and is declared a Public Financial Institution by government notification.
  • Broader precedent: The opinion did not state that it was laying down any new judicial precedent beyond the advance ruling for the applicant; it applied existing statutory definitions and a saved governmental notification to the facts before it. No case law precedent was cited in the opinion.

This summary is based exclusively on the content of the provided opinion and does not add, infer or assume information beyond what the opinion contains.

    National Dairy Development Board, In Re

    The applicant, NDDB, is a statutory body constituted by an Act of Parliament, namely the National Dairy Development Board Act, 1987 (NDDB Act); the objectives of NDDB include promoting dairy and other agriculture based industries; and the activities undertaken by NDDB, to fulfill its objectives, not only include technical or administration assistance but also financial assistance.

    1.1 The applicant submitted that the NDDB Act has specifically authorized NDDB to undertake the activity of financing, including lending and borrowing money, for diverse purposes. The applicant pointed out following relevant sections of the NDDB Act.

    “(d) designing, planning, promoting, developing, constructing, sponsoring and setting up of dairy industries and undertaking any other related promotional activity including financing of the same;”

    “(I) providing financial, technical, administrative, managerial or other assistance or taking such measures as may be necessary—

    (A) for the development (if required by the import of quality semen) and preservation of High yielding cattle;

    (B) for adopting improved methods of cattle breeding;

    (B) for increasing production and supply of better and improved animal feed including fodder; and

    (D) generally for the enhancement of the cattle wealth of the country”

    “(j) processing, promoting or financing technological, industrial or economic research in milk and milk products in such manner as the Board may deem fit by the utilization of available institutions or otherwise;”

    (k) financing, in such manner as the Board may deem appropriate (including contribution to capital), of co-operative federations, co-operative unions or co-operative enterprises or of any scheme in the co-operative or public sector intended to stimulate the production, preservation, distribution and consumption of milk and milk products nationwide.”

    “(v) advancing or lending money upon security of movable or immovable property or otherwise”

    “(w) borrowing money in such manner and upon such security as the Board may deem fit,”

    The applicant further submitted that apart from above, as per sub-section (5) of section 16 of the NDDB Act, it can participate, with the prior approval of the Central Government, in any organization, financially, managerially or in any other manner.

    1.2 The applicant further submitted that it is engaged into activity of financing as its regular business activity; that it provides finance/lend money in similar manner as is done by a banking company or financial institution in general parlance; that it provides various kinds of financial assistance such as (a) term loans (b) short term loans (c) working capital assistance.

    1.3 The applicant also stated that NDDB has been declared as Public Financial Institution vide Notification reference SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004, issued under Section 4A of the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956.

    1.4 The applicant then referred to the Section 17 of CGST Act; extract of which is as under—

    “(4) A banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, engaged in supplying services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans or advance shall have the option to either comply with the provisions of sub-section (2), or avail of, every month, an amount equal to fifty percent of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services in that month and rest shall lapse”

    1.5 It is further submitted that the applicant is neither banking company nor non-banking financial institution which is clear from the NDDB Act and thus it is necessary to see that whether the applicant can be considered as ‘financial institution’ or not, for taking benefits of tax credit. The applicant stated that there is no provision which states or defines what could be considered as financial institution or the law is silent on this count, for the purpose of eligibility of input tax credit. The applicant stated further that Rule 2(bd) of the erstwhile Services Tax Rules, 1994 defined ‘financial institution’ as followers—

    “financial institution has the meaning assigned to it in clause (c) of section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.”

    It is further stated that the definition of financial institution has limited applicability and those institutions which are considered as financial institution as per RBI Act would only be eligible for availing defined proportion of cenvat credit as per cenvat credit Rules which has narrowed down the scope of benefit, which is against the principle of seamless credit in GST; that the applicant believes that restriction has been removed in GST regime and the scope of financial institution has widened to include all those organization which are dealing in financing or lending of money.

    1.6 The applicant further stated that based on the provisions in respect of ‘public financial institution’ given under the Companies Act, 2013, the Government vide Notification Reference SO 219(E) dated 23.2.2004 has prescribed NDDB as Public Financial Institution. It is further stated that by virtue of that provision, the applicant is well considered as public financial institution which needs analysis to see whether the applicant is eligible to avail benefit of lump-sum input tax credit.

    1.7 Considering above submissions, the applicant has set forth the following question to seek advance ruling of the Authority—

    (i) Whether NDDB can be considered as financial institution for the purpose of availing credit to the extent of fifty percent of input tax credit, as prescribed in Section 17 of CGST Act, 2017?

    2. Central Goods and Services tax, Vadodara_ I Commissionerate, vide letter F. No. IV/16-12/GST/Adv. Ruling/Sec. 97/T/2017-2018 dated 3.11.2017 have offered comments on the issue under consideration. It is informed that Ministry of Finance (Department of Company Affairs) vide Notification dated 23.2.2004 has declared the NDDB as a Public Financial Institution under sub-section (2) of Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956. In the new Companies Act, 2013, all Notifications issued under the earlier Act of 1956 have been saved vide provisions of Section 465(2)(a) and therefore, the tax payer is a Public Financial Institution. It is also submitted that the applicant may be considered as Financial Institution as they seem to be satisfying the requirement as provided in Section 45-I(c)(i) of the RBI Act. It has been opined that the applicant can avail of, every month, an amount equal to fifty percent of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services in that month as prescribed under sub-section 4 of section 17 of the CGST Act, 2017.

    3. We heard Shri Hardik Shah, Chartered Accountant, for the appellant on 07.11.2017. We have gone through the submissions made by the applicant in its application for advance ruling and made at the time of personal hearing. Further we have also gone through the comments offered by the department vide letter F. No. IV/16-12/CGST/Adv. Ruling/Sec. 97/T/2017-2018 dated 3.11.2017.

    4. We find that objectives of NDDB include promoting dairy and other agriculture based industries and to fulfill its objectives NDDB undertakes the activities in the form of technical or administrative assistance and financial assistance. Further, NDDB Act, 1987 is found to have specifically authorized NDDB to undertake the activity of financing including lending and borrowing money for diverse purpose. According to Section 16 of the NDDB Act the applicant provides finance/lends money solely to dairy co-operatives in a similar manner as is done by a banking company or a financial institution in general parlance. The applicant submits that they provide various kinds of financial assistance such as (a) term loans (b) short term loans (c) working capital assistance; that the loans are given on similar terms and conditions as prevailing in market such as secured loans against hypothecation of stock and properties.

    5. As per the submissions of the applicant, NDDB is neither banking company nor non-banking financial institution which is clear from the provisions of NDDB Act. However, considering the above said activities performed by them, it is to be examined as to whether NDDB can be as a ‘financial institution’ or not for taking the benefits of input tax credit as per Section 17(2) of the CGST Act.

    6. Since the question related to determine the eligibility of input tax credit for a banking company or financial institution under GST Act/Rules, we would like to examine the same.

    7. Section 17(4) of the CGST Act, 2017 says that a banking company or a financial institution including a non-banking financial company, engaged in supplying services by way of accepting deposits, extending loans or advances shall have the option to either comply with the provisions of section 17(2), or avail of, every month, an amount equal to 50% of the eligible input tax credit on inputs, capital goods and input services in that month.

    8. The applicant is found to have stated that there is no provision which states or defines what could be considered as financial institution in GST law, for the purpose of eligibility of input tax credit. But we observe that the phrase ‘financial institution’ has been defined under Section 13(8)(c) of IGST Act, 2017 as under—

    “(c) “Financial institution” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (c) of section 45-I of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934,”

    Section 20 of IGST Act provides that provisions of CGST Act shall mutatis mutandis apply to IGST Act.

    9. It is relevant now to examine the meaning assigned to the word ‘financial institution’ in clause (c) of Section 45-I of Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934. As per the said clause of RBI Act, ‘financial Institution’ is defined as under—

    “Financial Institution” means any non-banking institution which carries on as its business or part of its business any of the following activities, namely:

    (i) The financing, whether by way of making loans or advances or otherwise, of any activity other than its own;

    (ii) ……….

    10. It would be seen that as per the activities performed by the applicant, narrated above, NDDB can be considered as a financial institution as they seem to be satisfying the requirement as provided in Section 45-I(C) of the RBI Act. Besides, NDDB is also declared as a ‘public of financial institution’ under the company Act vide Notification No. So 219(E) dated 23.02.2004.

    11. Considering above, we are of the view that NDDB can be considered as ‘financial institution’ for the purpose of availing credit to the extent of fifty percent of input tax credit, as prescribed in Section 17 of CGST Act.

    12. In view of the foregoing, we rule as under:—

    RULING

    National Dairy Development Board (GSTIN 24AADCN2029C1Z5) is to be considered as ‘Financial Institution’ for the purpose of section 17(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    National Dairy Development Board, In Re
    (Feb 22, 2019)