Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

The Supreme Court previously delivered a judgment fixing the Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR)–based licence fee and spectrum usage charge (SUC) liabilities of several Telecom Service Providers (TSPs). After that judgment, the Central Government approached the Court seeking approval of a specific time frame and security mechanism for recovery of the dues. During the present hearing, certain TSPs again attempted to pursue “reassessment and recalculation” of the amounts, which the Court rejected as impermissible. The Court treated the figures set out at pages 180–181 of Miscellaneous Application Diary No. 9887 of 2020 in Civil Appeal No. 6328-6399 of 2015 as final and non-negotiable. In addition, four TSPs—Aircel Group, Reliance Communication/Reliance Telecom, Sistema Shyam Teleservices, and Videocon Telecommunications—are undergoing insolvency or liquidation proceedings, prompting the Court to call for all documents pertaining to those proceedings.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether any further reassessment or self-assessment of AGR-based dues can be entertained after the Court’s prior judgment.
  2. What time frame and security mechanism should govern payment of the confirmed dues by operational TSPs.
  3. Whether the initiation of insolvency proceedings by certain TSPs is bona fide and how the Government can secure recovery of dues from companies under liquidation.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

• The Court emphatically ruled that its earlier judgment is final; therefore, “there is no scope of raising any further dispute” regarding the computation of AGR dues.
• Any attempt by TSPs to initiate a “new round of litigation” under the guise of self-assessment was declared impermissible.
• The figures reproduced in the order (totalling Rs. 1,43,271.74 crore as balance due) are deemed conclusive, and “no recalculation and self-assessment can be undertaken.”
• Regarding TSPs in insolvency, the Court expressed concern over outstanding dues of approximately Rs. 38,964.27 crore and stated its intention to “examine the bonafides of the initiation of the proceedings under the IBC.” It therefore directed that all relevant insolvency and liquidation documents be filed within ten days.
• On the Government’s proposal for payment by instalments, the Court “closed the matter” for arguments and reserved its order on the appropriate time frame and security mechanism.

Holding and Implications

HOLDING: The AGR amounts listed in the order are declared final and indisputable; no further reassessment is allowed. The Court reserved its order on the instalment plan proposed by the Government and set 10 August 2020 for a separate hearing regarding TSPs under insolvency, directing parties to file relevant documents and written submissions by 7 August 2020.

Implications: Operational TSPs must pay the specified dues without contest or recalculation. Companies in insolvency face heightened judicial scrutiny of their proceedings, which may affect the distribution of their assets and the Government’s ability to recover dues. The order reinforces the finality of the Court’s earlier AGR judgment but does not establish new legal precedent beyond that affirmation.

    Mandar Deshpande, In Re

    1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties at length with respect to the prayer made by the Central Government and the time frame for making the payment as per the order passed by this Court. During course of hearing, again an attempt was made to wriggle out of our judgment and orders, which were passed by this Court under the guise of reassessment and recalculation. That is not at all permissible. In view of decision, there is no scope of raising any further dispute with respect to any item or to raise fresh dispute. No dispute can be raised with respect to dues and they have to be paid. New round of litigation is prohibited. In the second inning, we have heard the same after remand of the issues to the TDSAT. Thereafter, there is no question of entertaining any kind of dispute with respect to the payment and dues worked out. No dispute shall be entertained. The calculations which have been given and the amount to be recovered at pages 180-181 of M.A.D. No. 9887 of 2020 (application for modification) in C.A. No. 6328-6399 of 2015 are taken to be as final amount and there can be no dispute raised about it. No recalculation and self-assessment can be undertaken. The calculations are as under :—

    “AMOUNTS RECOVERABLE FROM MAJOR TSPs AS PER

    PRILIMINARY ASSESSMENTS

    S. No. Name of the Company Total Demand of DoT incorporat ing C&AG and Special Audit as on October 2019 (Rs. Cr.) (LF+SUC) Self Assessment by Licensee pursuant to the Hon'ble SC Judgment (Rs. Cr.) Payment Received till 06.03.2020 (Rs. Cr.) Balance Due (Rs. Cr.) A B C D Operational TSPs party to the litigation 1. BHARTI AIRTEL GROUP 43980.00 13004.00 18,004.00 25976.00 2. TELENOR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED BHARTI GROUP 43980.00 13004.00 18004.00 3. IDEA CELLULAR LTD. 58254.00 21533 (LF 14453+SUC 7080) 3,500.00 54,754.00 4. VODAFONE GROUP OF COMPANIES VODAFONE IDEA 58254.00 21533.00 3500.00 54754.00 5. TATA GROUP OF COMPANIES 16798.00 2197 (LF 1720 + SUC 477) 4,197.00 12,601.00 6. QUADRANT TELEVENTURES LIMITED 189.91 25.28 0.69 189.22 7. RELIANCE JIO INFOCOMM LTD. 70.53 194.79 (LF 148.03+SUC 46.76) 195.18 - Sub-total (1-7) 119292.44 36954.07 25,896.87 93520.22 TSPs under Insolvency 8. AIRCEL GROUP OF COMPANIES 12389.00 - 12389.00 9. RELIANCE COMMUNICATION/RELIANCE TELECOM LIMITED 25199.27 3.96 25194.58 10. SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES LTD. 222.1 (LF 166.1+SUC 56) 0.73 11. VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD. 1376.00 - 1376.00 Sub-total (8-10) 38964.27 - 4.69 38959.58 TSPs which were not party to the litigation 12. LOOP TELECOM PVT. LTD. 604.00 - 604.00 13. ETISALAT DB TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED 14. S TEL PVT. LTD. 15. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED 5835.85 - - 5835.85 16. MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED 4352.09 - 4352.09 Sub-total (11-16) 10791.94 222.1 0.00 10791.94 TOTAL 169048.65 37176.17 25901.56 143271.74

    1. Total Demands are inclusive of Principal, Interest, Penalty and Interest on Penalty.

    2. Total Demands have been calculated generally up to FY 2016-17. On these outstanding amounts, Interest/Penalty/Interest on Penalty is calculated up to October, 2019.

    3. All dues are subject to further revisions due to departmental assessments, CAG audits, Special Audits, Court Cases etc.”

    2. However, when we consider the dues of Telecom Service Providers under insolvency, we find that there are several companies which have dues to the extent of Rs. 38,964.27 crores, which have gone under liquidation. Since the dues are huge, we propose to examine the bonafides of the initiation of the proceedings under the IBC. Let all the documents of the companies viz. Aircel Group of Companies, Reliance Communication/Reliance Telecom Limited, Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. and Videocon Telecommunications Ltd. relating to liquidation and orders passed in proceedings be placed on record within 10 days from today.

    3. We have closed the matter with respect to the prayer made for making the payment in installments and the offer made by the Government, the time frame thereto and how to secure the amount. The order is reserved on that aspect.

    4. However, we will hear the matter separately with respect to the companies under liquidation and test the bonafides of their action and how to ensure that the amount is recovered. Let all the documents be placed on record within 10 days from today and the matter be listed for hearing about these companies on the above aspect on 10.08.2020.

    5. Written submissions and the reply, if any, be filed on or before 07.08.2020.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Mandar Deshpande, In Re
    (Jul 20, 2020)