AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Commissioner Of Central Excise & S.T., Kanpur v. National Productivity Council .

    Per: Archana Wadhwa Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 15.12.2015 of Commissioner (Appeals), Allahabad.

    2. We are informed about the Instructions dated 11-07-2018 issued by the C.B.E. & C. in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 fixing monetary limits below which appeal shall not be filed in the Tribunal. The monetary limit has been enhanced to Rs. 20 lakhs through the said Instructions. Further, the said APPEAL No.ST/70228/2018-CU[DB] Instruction clarified that the said instructions will apply to all pending cases.

    3. We also find that the Honble High Courts of Madras, Karnataka and Gujarat have held that the litigation policy containing monetary limit for filing appeals will apply to pending appeals also. [2015 (40) S.T.R. 656 (Mad.); 2014 (306) E.L.T. 153 (Guj.); 2011 (268) E.L.T. 344 (Kar.) = 2012 (26) S.T.R. 79 (Kar.)].

    4. It is further informed by the ld. AR that vide subsequent instructions issued vide F. No.390/Misc./116/2017-JC dated 04/04/2018, the earlier exclusion category not covered by the litigation policy has also now been included, by removing Sub-clause C of earlier instructions.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Central Excise & S.T., Kanpur v. National Productivity Council .
    (Feb 25, 2019)