AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
  • provisions of sections 5(b), 6(1)(a), 6(1)(g), 6(1)(k) and 6(1)(n) of the Banking Regulations Act
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949, sub-section (4) of section 80P
  • Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f 1-4-2006, Sub-section (4)
  • Co-operative Society Act, 1959. Registration
  • section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act
  • BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949
  • INCOME TAX ACT 1961
  • SECTION 6 BANKING REGULATION ACT
  • Banking Regulation Act, Co-operative
  • FINANCE ACT 2006
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Acts
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.
  • provisions of sections 5(b), 6(1)(a), 6(1)(g), 6(1)(k) and 6(1)(n) of the Banking Regulations Act
  • Banking Regulation Act, 1949, sub-section (4) of section 80P
  • Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f 1-4-2006, Sub-section (4)
  • Co-operative Society Act, 1959. Registration
  • section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act
  • BANKING REGULATION ACT 1949
  • INCOME TAX ACT 1961
  • SECTION 6 BANKING REGULATION ACT
  • Banking Regulation Act, Co-operative
  • FINANCE ACT 2006
Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This appeal by the revenue challenges the order dated 01.11.2012 of the CIT (Appeals)-II, Bangalore concerning the assessment year 2009-2010. The assessee, a co-operative society engaged in banking business, claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this deduction on the ground that the assessee was effectively a co-operative bank and thus not entitled to the deduction following the insertion of sub-section (4) in section 80P by the Finance Act, 2006. The CIT (Appeals) allowed the deduction, relying on Tribunal decisions distinguishing co-operative banks from co-operative societies. The revenue has now filed this appeal before the Tribunal against the CIT (Appeals) order.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether a co-operative society carrying on banking business is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act after the insertion of sub-section (4) in section 80P by the Finance Act, 2006.
  2. Whether the provisions of section 80P(4), which exclude co-operative banks other than primary agricultural credit societies or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development banks from deduction, apply to co-operative societies engaged in banking activities.

Arguments of the Parties

Revenue's Arguments

  • The assessee is a co-operative bank in substance, carrying on banking business, and thus not entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) after the insertion of sub-section (4) in section 80P.
  • Section 80P(4) excludes co-operative banks (except specified primary agricultural credit societies and rural development banks) from the deduction, and the assessee falls within this exclusion.
  • Features such as open membership, acceptance of deposits repayable on demand, and banking-like activities make the assessee akin to a banking institution under the Banking Regulation Act.

Assessee's Arguments

  • The assessee is a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank within the meaning of Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
  • Section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks as defined under the Banking Regulation Act and does not affect co-operative societies carrying on credit facilities to members.
  • Precedents and clarifications, including CBDT Circular No. 133/06/2007, support the view that co-operative societies are entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent Rule or Principle Cited For Application by the Court
ACIT, Circle-3(1), Bangalore v. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. (ITA No. 1069.Bang/2010) Section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative societies; distinction between co-operative banks and societies under the Banking Regulation Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee, being a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank, is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) despite the insertion of section 80P(4).
ITO, Ward-1(4) v. Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. [(2012) 24 Taxmann.com 127 (Pune-Trib)] Supporting authority on entitlement of co-operative societies to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). Followed by CIT (Appeals) to allow deduction to the assessee.
DCIT, Central Circle, Panaji v. Jayalakshmi Mahila Vividodeshagala Souharda Sahakari Ltd. (ITA Nos. 1 to 3 (PNJ)/1012) Supporting authority on the distinction between co-operative banks and co-operative societies for deduction under section 80P. Followed by CIT (Appeals) to uphold deduction claim.
CIT v. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd., Gujarat High Court (Tax Appeal Nos. 442, 443, 863 of 2013) Interpretation of section 80P(4) and clarification that it applies only to co-operative banks and not co-operative societies. The High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming that co-operative societies engaged in providing credit facilities to members are entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court analyzed the statutory provisions of section 80P, particularly the insertion of sub-section (4) by the Finance Act, 2006, which excludes co-operative banks (except certain primary agricultural credit societies and rural development banks) from deduction under section 80P. The court examined the definition of "co-operative bank" under Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and contrasted it with co-operative societies registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The court noted that the assessee, although engaged in banking business, is registered as a co-operative society and does not fall within the statutory definition of a co-operative bank. The court relied on the distinction between co-operative banks and co-operative societies regarding registration, nature of business, regulatory oversight, and permissible activities.

Further, the court referred to authoritative clarifications, including the CBDT Circular No. 133/06/2007, which confirmed that section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks. The court also considered relevant Tribunal precedents and the Gujarat High Court decision, which supported the view that the assessee is entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Accordingly, the court concluded that the exclusion under section 80P(4) does not apply to the assessee, and hence, the deduction claimed by the assessee must be allowed.

Holding and Implications

The appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.

The court's decision confirms that co-operative societies engaged in banking or credit activities with their members, but not falling within the definition of co-operative banks under the Banking Regulation Act, are entitled to claim deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. This ruling directly affects the parties by allowing the assessee the claimed deduction for the assessment year in question. The decision follows established precedents and clarifications and does not set any new legal precedent beyond affirming the existing interpretation of section 80P.

To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Ito v. Divyajyothi Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd.

    N.V Vasudevan, J.M:— This appeal by the revenue is against the order dated 01.11.2012 of the CIT (Appeals)-II, Bangalore relating to assessment year 2009-2010.

    2. The assessee is a co-operative society. It is engaged in banking business also. The assessee had claimed deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Under Sec. 80P(2)(i) of the Act where the gross total income of a co-operative society includes income from carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members, the same is allowed deduction. By the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f 1-4-2006, Sub-section (4) was inserted in Sec. 80-P which provides as follows:

    “(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank.

    Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-section,—

    (a) “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);

    (b) “primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank” means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities.”

    3. The AO was of the view that after amended by the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f 1.4.2007 by which sub-section (4) was inserted, the Assessee which was a co-operative society carrying on banking business was not entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(i) of the Act. According to the AO, the assessee was a co-operative bank and therefore the deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) cannot be allowed. In coming to the above conclusion, the AO noticed that the nature of the activity of the assessee, though registered as a credit co-operative society, is that of a banking institution notwithstanding the fact that receipt of and lending money is limited to its members. The AO further noticed that clause (viia) in section 2(24) of the Act was inserted by the Finance Act 2006 effective from 1/4/2007, which provides that profits and gains of any business (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co-operative society with its members the assessee's activity was also “Income”. That the deduction from gross total income of certain receipts is available only to primary agricultural credit societies or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development banks; and that the benefit of such deduction is not available to institutions like the assessee society. The AO also referred to section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act to hold that, if one of the two conditions of the appellant i.e its primary object should be banking or its principal business must be transaction in banking business, is sufficient to bring the appellant into the concept of a banking institution. The AO referred to the objects of the assessee society in its bye laws that the activities of the assessee fall within the provisions of sections 5(b), 6(1)(a), 6(1)(g), 6(1)(k) and 6(1)(n) of the Banking Regulations Act and held that, broadly, they are in the nature of banking activity. According to the AO, the following features make the assessee ineligible to exemption contemplated in section 80P of the Act:

    i) Since membership is open to anyone paying a sum of Rs. 10/- to Rs. 100/- for membership and no other condition is imposed. In other words, membership as is available in any banking institution is available in the case of the appellant society.

    ii) The purpose of accepting deposits from the public is for making investments and for lending to members. Confining the lending only to members makes no difference.

    iii) Deposits collected from the depositors are repayable on demand and do not go into the corpus of the appellant.

    iv) Though withdrawal of money is not done by cheques, drafts or pay-out slips, pay orders are issued in favour of a person on behalf of the depositor.

    v) The assessee society came within the Explanation to sub-section (4) of section 80P of the Act as a banking institution.

    4. In the light of the above-mentioned observations, the AO held that the appellant was not entitled to exemption u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act and brought the same to tax.

    5. On appeal by the assessee, the CIT (Appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee for deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(ii) of the Act by following the decision of ITAT in the following cases:—

    i) ACIT, Circle-3(1), Bangalore v. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. - ITA. No. 1069.Bang/2010 dated 8/4/2011 [ITAT, Bangalore Bench “B”, Bangalore]

    ii) ITO, Ward-1(4) v. Jankalyan Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. [(2012) 24 Taxmann. com 127 (Pune-Trib) dated 26/6/2012]

    iii) DCIT, Central Circle, Panaji v. Jayalakshmi Mahila Vividodeshagala Souharda Sahakari Ltd. ITA Nos. 1 to 3 (PNJ)/1012 dated 30/3/2012.

    6. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT (Appeals), the revenue has filed the present appeal before the Tribunal.

    7. At the time of hearing, it was seen that the issue raised by the revenue has already been considered and decided by this Tribunal in the case of ACIT, Circle 3(1), Bangalore v. Bangalore Commercial Transport Credit Co-operative Society Ltd. in ITA No. 1069.Bang/2010, wherein this Tribunal held that section 80P(4) is applicable only to co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative societies. The intention of the legislature of bringing in co-operative banks into the taxation structure was mainly to bring in par with commercial banks. Since the assessee is a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank, the provisions of section 80P(4) will not have application in the assessee's case and therefore, it is entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The following were the relevant observations of the Tribunal:—

    “9. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. The assessee was denied the deduction u/s. 80-P(2)(a)(i) of the Act for the reason of introduction of sub-section 4 to section 80P. Section 80P(4) reads as follows:—

    “(4) The provisions of this section shall not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank.

    Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-section,

    (a) “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949);

    (b) “primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank” means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long term credit for agricultural and rural development activities”.

    9.1 The above sub-section 4 of section 80P provides that deduction under the said section shall not be available to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or rural development bank. For the purpose of the said sub-section, co-operative bank shall have the meaning assigned to it in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. In Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, “co-operative bank” means a State Co-operative Bank, a Central Co-operative Bank and a Primate Co-operative Bank.

    9.2 From the above section, it is clear that the provisions of section 80P(4) has got its application only to co-operative banks. Section 80P(4) does not define the word “co-operative society”. The existing sub-section 80P(2)(a)(i) shall be applicable to a co-operative society carrying on credit facility to its members. This view is clarified by Central Board of Direct Tax vide its clarification No. 133/06/2007-TPL dated 9 May, 2007. The difference between a co-operative bank and a co-operative society are as follows:—

    Nature Co-operative society registered under Banking Regulation Act, 1949 Co-operative society registered under Karnataka Co-operative Society Act, 1959. Registration Under the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Nature of business 1. As defined in section 6 of Banking Regulation Act. 2. Can open savings bank account, current account, overdraft account, cash credit account, issue letter of credit, discounting bills of exchange, issue cheques, demand drafts (DD), Pay Orders, Gift cheques, lockers, bank guarantees etc. 3. Co-operative Banks can act as clearing agent for cheques, DDs, pay orders and other forms. 4. Banks are bound to follow the rules, regulations and directions issued by Reserve Bank of India (RBI). 1. As per the bye laws of the co-operative society. 2. Society cannot open savings bank account, current account, issue letter of credit, discounting bills of exchange, issue cheques, demand drafts, pay orders, gift cheques, lockers, bank guarantees etc. 3. Society cannot act as clearing agent, for cheques, DDs, pay orders and other forms. 4. Society are bound by rules and regulations as specified by in the co-operative societies Act. Filing of returns Co-operative banks have to submit annual return to RBI every year. Society has to submit the annual return to Registrar of Societies. Inspection RBI has the power to inspect accounts and overall functioning of the bank. Registrar has the power to inspect accounts and overall functioning of the bank. Part V Part V of the Banking Regulation Act is applicable to co-operative banks. Part V of the Banking Regulation Act is not applicable to co-operative banks. Use of words The word ‘bank.’, banker', ‘banking’ can be used by a co-operative bank. The word ‘bank’, banker', ‘banking’ cannot be used by a co-operative society.

    9.3 If the intention of the legislature was not to grant deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) to co-operative societies carrying on the business of providing credit facilities to its members, then this section would have been deleted. The new proviso to section 80P(4) which is brought into statute is applicable only to co-operative banks and not to credit co-operative societies. The intention of the legislature of bringing in co-operative banks into the taxation structure was mainly to bring in par with commercial banks. Since the assessee is a co-operative society and not a co-operative bank, the provisions of section 80P(4) will not have application in the assessee's case and therefore, it is entitled to deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Hence, we are of the view that the order of the CIT(A) is correct and in accordance with law and no interference is called for.”

    8. The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Tax appeal No. 442 of 2013 with Tax appeal No. 443 of 2013 with Tax appeal No. 863 of 2013 in the case of CIT v. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. by judgment dated 15.1.2014 had to deal with the following question of law:

    “Whether the Hon'ble Tribunal is correct in allowing deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) to assessee's society even though same is covered under section 80P(4) rws 2(24)(viia) being income from providing credit facilities carried on by a co-operative society with its member?”

    The Hon'ble Court held as follows:

    “4. As per section 80P(4), the provisions of section 80P would not apply in relation to any co-operative bank other than primary agricultural credit society or primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. As per the explanation, the terms “co-operative bank” and “primary agricultural credit society” shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

    5. Assessing Officer held that by virtue of section 80P(4), the respondent assessee would not be entitled to benefits of deduction under section 80P. CIT (Appeals) as well as the Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer on the premise that the respondent assessee not being a bank, exclusion provided in sub-section(4) of section 80P would not apply. This, irrespective of the fact that the respondent would not fall within the expression “primary agricultural credit society”.

    6. Had this been the plain statutory provisions under consideration in isolation, in our opinion, the question of law could be stated to have arisen. When, as contended by the assessee, by virtue of sub-section(4) only co-operative banks other than those mentioned therein were meant to be excluded for the purpose of deduction under section 80P, a question would arise why then Legislature specified primary agricultural credit societies along with primary co-operative agricultural and rural development banks for exclusion from such exclusion and in other words, continued to hold such entity as eligible for deduction. However, the issue has been considerably simplified by virtue of CBDT circular No. 133 of 2007 dated 9.5.2007 Circular provides as under:—

    “Subject: Clarification regarding admissibly of deduction under section 80P of the Income-Tax Act, 1961.

    1. Please refer to your letter no. DCUS/30688/2007, dated 28.03.2007 addressed to Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, on the above given subject.

    2. In this regard, I have been directed to state that sub-section(4) of section 80P provides that deduction under the said section shall not be allowable to any co-operative bank other than a primary agricultural credit society or a primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank. For the purpose of the said sub-section, co-operative bank shall have the meaning assigned to it in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

    3. In part V of the Banking Regulation Act, “Co-operative Bank” means a State Co-operative bank, a Central Co-operative Bank and a primary Co-operative bank.

    4. Thus, if the Delhi Co-op. Urban T & C Society Ltd. does not fall within the meaning of “Co-operative Bank” as defined in part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, sub-section (4) of section 80P will not apply in this case.

    5. The issues with the approval of Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes.”

    7. From the above clarification, it can be gathered that sub-section(4) of section 80P will not apply to an assessee which is not a co-operative bank. In the case clarified by CBDT, Delhi Co-op. Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. was under consideration. Circular clarified that the said entity not being a co-operative bank, section 80P(4) of the Act would not apply to it. In view of such clarification, we cannot entertain the Revenue's contention that section 80P(4) would exclude not only the co-operative banks other than those fulfilling the description contained therein but also credit societies, which are not co-operative banks. In the present case, respondent assessee is admittedly not a credit co-operative bank but a credit co-operative society. Exclusion clause of sub-section(4) of section 80P, therefore, would not apply. In the result, Tax Appeals are dismissed.”

    9. In view of the aforesaid decisions, we are of the view that there is no merit in this appeal by the revenue. Consequently, the same is dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ito v. Divyajyothi Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd.
    (Feb 7, 2014)