Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
To access the original judgment, please Sign In or Subscribe.

    Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Central Office, K.H. Road, Bangalore-560 027. By Its Managing Director Petitioner v. Karnataka State Transport Authority M.S. Building, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bangalore-560 001. Rep. By Its Secretary

    Ravi Malimath, J.:— Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

    2. The plea of the petitioner is in respect of the representations made by him. The 3 respondent has not considered any of his requests. Hence, the instant petitions, seeking for a writ of mandamus to consider the representations.

    3. Learned Government Advocate submits that a meeting is likely to be convened shortly and appropriate orders would be passed.

    4. In view of the submission made, writ petitions are allowed. Respondent No. 3 is directed to pass appropriate orders on the representations made by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Karnataka State Road... v. Karnataka State Tran...
    (Aug 3, 2015)