AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Lalit Chandra Neogi And Ors. 2Nd Party, v. Tarini Persad Gupta 1St Party, Opposite Party.

    This rule was granted for the purpose of considering the legality of the order made by the Deputy Magistrate under sec. 147 of the Criminal Procedure Code: and we have had the opportunity and advantage of hearing Sir Griffith Evans on the law and the difficulties created by the imperfect drafting of sec. 147, C. Cr. P. Upon the facts found by the Deputy Magistrate, we see no sufficient reason to differentiate the present case from the case of Pasupati Nath Bose v. Nando Lal Bose, and, as at present advised, we see also no reason for taking the course suggested by learned counsel, viz., to refer the case to a Full Bench. Having, therefore, given the case our best consideration we have come to the conclusion that this rule ought to be discharged and we discharge it accordingly.

    H.P.C
    Rule discharged.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Lalit Chandra Neogi And Ors. 2Nd Party, v. Tarini Persad Gupta 1St Party, Opposite Party.
    (Feb 8, 1901)