Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Secretary Of State For India In Council v. Illikkal Assan

    We think that a notice under Sect. 7 calling on the person in occupation to show cause why he should not be proceeded against under Sect. 5 or Sect. 6 of the Act does not give rise to a cause of action. This was pointed out in Narayana Pillai v. Secretary of State. If the learned Judges who decided Bhaskaradu v. Subbarayudu were of a different opinion we are with respect unable to agree with them. Further whether the present suit be regarded as based on the notice under Sect. 7 or on the levy of penal assessment in June 1910 more than six months before the date of suit, it is in either view barred under Sect. 14 because it was not instituted within six months from the date at which the cause of action arose.

    Reference answered in the affirmative.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Secretary Of State For India In Council v. Illikkal Assan
    (Oct 18, 1915)