Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Arunachala Asari Petitioner (Counter-Petitioner In M.C No. 53 Of 1932 On The File Of The Court Of Sub-Divisional First Class Magistrate Salem). v. Anandayammal (Petitioner In Do).

    I cannot see that S. 488 of the Criminal Procedure Code has anything to do with ordinary conjugal rights; it deals with “maintenance” only and I see no reason why maintenance should be supposed to include anything more than appropriate food, clothing and lodging.

    On the facts of this case it is clear that the husband has offered to give his wife maintenance in his house but he wants her to live in a separate room and not to associate with the other members of his family. She has refused this offer and in my opinion she has no sufficient grounds for refusing. She cannot claim under S. 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be treated “as a wife”; she can only claim to be maintained on a scale appropriate to her station in life.

    The order for payment of separate maintenance is therefore unsupportable, and I set it aside.

    N.R.R Order set aside.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Arunachala Asari Pet... v. Anandayammal (Petiti...
    (Apr 27, 1933)