Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Abdur Shukur Sahib v. Emperor

    The accused was charged by the police with preferring a false or frivolous charge against police officials at Polur.

    The accused sent a petition containing various allegations which were subsequently found to be false to the District Superintendent of Police. His letter was posted at Polur and apparently opened by the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore. The post office, therefore, acted as the agent of the accused in carrying this letter to the District Superintendent at North Arcot; and the effect was the same as if the accused had handed over the letter in person to the District Superintendent of Police at Vellore. The false or frivolous charge was therefore made at Vellore and not at Polur. It therefore fellows that the Magistrate having jurisdiction would be the Magistrate at Vellore.

    The petition is therefore allowed and the Magistrate ordered to return the charge sheet to be presented to the Magistrate having jurisdiction.

    N.T.RPetition allowed

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Abdur Shukur Sahib v. Emperor
    (Aug 5, 1942)