AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Niranjan Singh Patel v. State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others

    Sujoy Paul, J.:— The singular point raised in this writ petition is that the petitioner retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2013, but the respondents paid him retiral dues on 06.08.2014 The delay in making payment is solely attributable to the respondents. The petitioner averred about it in para No. 5.7 of the petition. The respondents have filed a sketchy return. No parawise reply has been filed. The only stand taken by the respondents in their reply is that the amount has already been paid. The respondents have not stated a single reason for the delay caused in making the said payment. Thus, respondents are required to pay interest on delayed payment.

    2. In (1994) 2 SCC 240 [Union of India v. Justice S.S Sandhawalia (Retd.)] the Apex Court held, when an amount due in favour of an employee is withheld by the employer for the reasons solely attributable to the department, the department shall pay interest.

    3. In view of aforesaid, this petition is allowed by directing the respondents to pay 12% interest from due date till the date of actual payment. The aforesaid exercise may be completed within 90 days' from the date of communication of this order.

    4. Petition is allowed. No cost.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Niranjan Singh Patel v. State Of Madhya Pradesh & Others
    (Dec 7, 2016)