AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
  • clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1966
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
  • clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1966

    Modi Industries Ltd. And Another v. Union Of India And Others

    1. In compliance with our order dated 30-1-1996, an additional affidavit on behalf of the Union of India has been filed by Shri Deepak Khandekar, Deputy Secretary to the Government of India. In the additional affidavit, it has been expressly stated that while determining the minimum cane price of levy sugar regard has been had only to the minimum cane price as spoken to in Section 3(3-C)(a) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and the additional cane price payable under clause 5-A of the Sugar (Control) Order, 1966, has not been taken into account, and that also there has been no mopping up of excess realisation on levy-free sale sugar while fixing the price of levy sugar for the season 1982-83.

    2. In view of the above further statement made in the additional affidavit filed on behalf of the Union of India, we are satisfied that this matter is not covered by the decision of this Court in Shri Malaprabha Coop. Sugar Factory Ltd. v. Union of India (1994) 1 SCC 648. Accordingly, the transferred case is dismissed. No costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Modi Industries Ltd. And Another v. Union Of India And Others
    (Feb 20, 1996)