Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Ram Shanker And Others v. State Of Uttar Pradesh .

    After hearing counsel for the parties, we find that it was not a case under Section 307, IPC at all. We, therefore, convert the conviction of appellant Ram Shanker from one under Section 307, IPC to that under Sections 325/34, IPC. An application has been made by both the parties that the offence may be compounded. In the circumstances, therefore, so far as the offence under Sections 325/34, IPC is concerned, we sanction the compounding of the offence as the parties have settled their differences and acquit Ram Shanker of the charges framed against him. The offence under Section 323, IPC is compoundable without permission of the Court, and as Sheo Shanker and Nand Kumar have compounded the offence, they are acquitted of the charges framed against them.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Ram Shanker And Others v. State Of Uttar Pradesh .
    (Apr 24, 1981)