Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Disposition
Judges

    Harbans Sharma v. Smt Pritam Kaur .

    1. Heard counsel. Special leave granted.

    2. We are not satisfied that the High Court was justified in dismissing the revision application summarily. Even assuming that the High Court came to the conclusion that there was no substance in the arguments advanced on behalf of the tenant, the High Court could have indicated its brief reasons in support of the view it took. In these circumstances we have no option save to set aside the order of the High Court and remand the matter to it for disposal in accordance with law after hearing both the sides. The High Court shall take up for hearing the revision application expeditiously since the proceedings have been pending since 1968.

    3. There will be no order as to costs.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Harbans Sharma v. Smt Pritam Kaur .
    (Mar 13, 1981)