Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 6-N of the U.P Industrial Disputes Act
  • Section 6-P of the U.P Industrial Disputes Act
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Acts
  • Section 6-N of the U.P Industrial Disputes Act
  • Section 6-P of the U.P Industrial Disputes Act

    Kamlesh Singh v. Presiding Officer And Another

    1. Special leave granted.

    2. The Labour Court has held that Section 6-N of the U.P Indusuial Disputes Act controls Section 6-P also and, therefore, for the application of Section 6-P, the requirement of Section 6-N that a workman must be continuously employed for the prescribed period must be satisfied. We do not think so. Section 6-P is independent of Section 6-N and by its own force it prescribes that the employer shall ordinarily retrench the workman who was the last person to be employed in the category. The order of the Labour Court is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Labour Court for granting appropriate relief to the workman by applying Section 6-P. The workman is entitled to his costs. Parties are at liberty to adduce additional evidence, if necessary. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kamlesh Singh v. Presiding Officer And Another
    (Dec 4, 1986)