Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    M.K. Jain v. Cit

    (By Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri) Mr. Joseph Vallapally, the learned senior advocate, appearing for the applicant, submits that having regard to the provisions of section 245N of the Income-tax Act, 1961,the applicant does not wish to proceed with the application and seeks permission to withdraw the application.

    2. The request for withdrawal of the application is made more than

    30 days of the filing of the application. Though sub-section (3) of section 245q provides that an application filed under sub-section (1) thereof may be withdrawn by the applicant within 30 days from the date of the application, this, however, in our view, does not preclude the Authority from permitting withdrawal of the application after the said period with the permission of the Authority if the circumstances of the case so justify. We have taken the same view in AAR No.594 of 2002 which is reiterated in many cases thereafter.

    2. Having regard to the circumstances of this case, we permit the applicant to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JUSTICE S.S.M. QUADRI) CHAIRMAN (K.D. SINGH) Sd/- MEMBER Sd/- (A.S. NARANG) MEMBER F.No. AAR/644/2004 Dated .. This copy is certified to be a true copy of the Order and is sent to:

    1. The applicant.

    2. The Joint Secretary (FT&TR- I, II), M/Finance, CBDT, North Block, New Delhi.

    3. The CIT-III, Chennai.

    4. Guard file. (A.K. Pandey) Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax(AAR)

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    M.K. Jain v. Cit
    (Feb 23, 2005)