Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Smart Summary

Summary of Opinion by Veeraswami, J. — Reference relating to s.15C (Assessment Year 1959-60)

Factual and Procedural Background

This reference concerns assessment year 1959-60 and raises the question whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under section 15C in respect of profit earned from the Pallavaram quarry. The operative facts recorded in the opinion are:

  • At the Pallavaram quarry, rocks and boulders were cut into chips of various sizes using machinery.
  • Departmental authorities treated the activity as not constituting an industrial undertaking on the ground that it did not involve a manufacturing process.
  • The Tribunal disagreed with the departmental view and held that the process of converting boulders into small stones with the aid of machinery is a manufacturing process, and accordingly the undertaking is an industrial undertaking.

The reference asked the court to decide whether the assessee is entitled to the exemption under section 15C given the Tribunal's finding.

Legal Issues Presented

  1. Whether the activity carried on in the Pallavaram quarry — cutting rocks and boulders into chips with the aid of machinery — amounts to a "manufacturing process" such that the undertaking qualifies as an "industrial undertaking" for the purposes of section 15C.
  2. Whether the assessee is therefore entitled to the exemption under section 15C for the assessment year 1959-60, subject to the statutory requirement regarding the number of employees employed in a manufacturing process with or without power.

Arguments of the Parties

Departmental/Revenue Position

  • The departmental officers took the view that the quarry activity was not an industrial undertaking because it did not involve a manufacturing process.

Tribunal/Assessee Position

  • The Tribunal held that converting boulders into small stones with the aid of labour and machinery constitutes a manufacturing process and that the undertaking is therefore an industrial undertaking, entitling the assessee to benefit under section 15C.

Table of Precedents Cited

No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court's analysis proceeds in the following steps, as set out in the opinion:

  1. The court identifies the statutory scheme under section 15C: the exemption applies only to newly established industrial undertakings and only where the profits charged to tax are derived from an industrial undertaking; additionally, the undertaking must employ the statutory minimum number of workers — 10 or more in a manufacturing process carried on with aid of power, or 20 or more in a manufacturing process carried on without the aid of power.
  2. The court states that to obtain the benefit of section 15C the assessee must establish two things: (a) that the profits and gains are derived from an industrial undertaking, and (b) that the undertaking employed the required number of persons in a manufacturing process carried on with or without power.
  3. The court examines the ordinary meaning of key terms using Webster's New International Dictionary as the source cited in the opinion:
    • "Industry" includes systematic labour or habitual employment and any department or branch of business that employs labour and capital.
    • "Undertaking" is anything undertaken — a business, work, or project or enterprise.
    • "Manufacture" is defined to include anything made from raw materials by machinery or by hand, producing a new product according to an organised plan and usually with machinery.
  4. Applying these definitions, the court reasoned that the quarry activity plainly involved labour and capital (machinery) and produced a commodity (stones/chips) of value by converting raw material (boulders) into a different form. The court concluded that the process of making chips with the aid of machinery is a manufacturing process because something is converted into a new product as a result of labour and machinery.
  5. On this basis the court agreed with the Tribunal's conclusion that the undertaking qualified as an industrial undertaking for the purposes of section 15C.

Holding and Implications

Holding: The court answered the reference in favour of the assessee and against the department; it held that the Tribunal was right in finding that the quarry activity constituted a manufacturing process and that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of section 15C.

Implications:

  • The direct effect is that the assessee is entitled to exemption under section 15C for the profits derived from the Pallavaram quarry, subject to satisfaction of the statutory employment-number requirement (as described in the opinion).
  • The opinion records an award of counsel's fee of Rs. 250.
  • The opinion does not discuss any broader legal or precedential implications beyond the determination of the reference; accordingly, no new precedent is expressly claimed to have been laid down in the text of the opinion.

End of summarized opinion. The summary strictly reflects only the content contained in the provided opinion text.

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v. M.R Gopal.

    Veeraswami, J.:— This reference relates to the assessment year 1959-60 and the question is whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under section 15C in regard to the profit earned by him in Pallavaram quarry. The actual process consisted of this, namely, rocks and boulders were cut into chips of various sizes with the use of machinery. The departmental authorities were of the view that this is not a case of an industrial undertaking because there was no manufacturing process involved. The Tribunal disagreed with the view and held that the process employed by the assessee in converting the boulders into small stones with the aid of machinery is a manufacturing process and the undertaking of the assessee is an industrial undertaking.

    2. Section 15C exempts from tax the newly established industrial undertakings, and the section would apply only if the profits or gains charged to tax are derived from any industrial undertaking, and further if the undertaking employs 10 or more workers in a manufacturing process carried on with the aid of power or employs 20 or more workers in a manufacturing process carried on without the aid of power.

    3. To qualify himself to the benefit of this section the assessee must establish that the profits and gains are derived from an industrial undertaking and that the undertaking employed the required number of people in a manufacturing process carried on with the aid of power or without power. What is an industry? Webster's New International Dictionary gives various meanings to the word, one of which is: “Systematic labour or habitual employment; especially human exertion employed for the creation of value, regarded by some as a species of capital or wealth; labour.” Another meaning is: “Any department or branch of art, occupation or business; especially one which employs much labour and capital and is a distinct branch of trade; as, the sugar industry; the iron industry; the cotton industry.” “Undertaking” also has different shades of meaning; and, according to Webster, it means: “Anything undertaken; any business, work, or project which one engages in, or attempts, an enterprise.” There is here no doubt that labour is employed, capital is utilised and a form of wealth is produced in the shape of small chips of stones by the aid of machinery. The process of making chips is obviously also an enterprise, an occupation, or a business, and, therefore, is an undertaking. In fact the only ground on which the departmental officers have held the process in question as not an industrial undertaking is that it did not involve a manufacturing process.

    “Manufacture”, as we find from Webster's Dictionary, means: “Anything made from raw materials by the hand, by machinery, or by art, as clothes, iron utensils, shoes, machinery, etc.; a manual occupation or trade; to produce by labour especially now, according to an organised plan and with division of labour and usually with machinery.” It seems to us to be unarguable having regard to the meaning of manufacture that the process employed in converting boulders into small chips of stones with the aid of labour and machinery is not a manufacturing process. Surely labour is employed and something is converted into something else, a product which is of value and is used, and in that sense the chips are a new production as a result of a manufacturing process.

    4. We are of opinion that the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is entitled to the benefit of section 15C.

    5. The reference is answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. Counsel's fee Rs. 250.

    6. Reference answered in favour of the assessee.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras v. M.R Gopal.
    (Jul 7, 1965)