AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Kothandarama Reddy And Another Petitioners (S 1 To 4). v. Jagathambal Ammal (Petitioner).

    To apply the Act XIX of 1841 to any particular case it is a condition precedent that the judge should find or be satisfied that the applicant was likely to be materially prejudiced if left to the ordinary remedy of a regular suit and that the application was made bona fide. See Sect. 3 of Act XIX of 1841. There is no finding here by the Court that these conditions are fulfilled. Without that finding the Court had no jurisdiction to act under the Act and its order is revisable; see Papamma v. The Collector of Godavari.

    The revision has been confined by the petitioners to B and C schedule properties only. The order of the lower Court with regard to these properties is set aside. Each party will bear his or their own costs.

    C.KPetition allowed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Kothandarama Reddy And Another Petitioners (S 1 To 4). v. Jagathambal Ammal (Petitioner).
    (Oct 11, 1922)