Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    J. Ovid v. Seth Chanda Bhan Opposite Party.

    1. The Magistrate had certainly no jurisdiction to direct the loek to be broken and the property to be handed over to the third party as custodian, but, at the same time, I fail to see that either the Sessions Judge 01 the High Court has any jurisdiction, either, to interfere in the matter. The remedy of Ovid is clearly by a suit in the Civil Court. I do not consider it necesssary to make any remarks as to what the nature of this suit should be or who should be the defendant, but it is clear to my mind time any order I might pass in the matter will be absolutely without jurisdiction.

    2. I, therefore, direct the papers to be returned.

    3. Interjerence declined.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    J. Ovid v. Seth Chanda Bhan Opposite Party.
    (Jul 5, 1922)