Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Acts
  • Article 35 of the rules
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Acts
  • Article 35 of the rules

    Achuta Bhatta v. Manjunathayya And Anr.

    1. We are of opinion that a suit for a declaration of right in respect of immoveable property is not a suit in which the subject ''matter of the claim does not admit of valuation

    " within the meaning of Article 35 of the rules framed under the Legal Practitioners Act. Such a suit falls within Art"
    . 31 and a reference to Rule 33 which defines the expression, the amount or value of the claim occurring in Rules 31 and 32, clearly shows that Rule 31 is not confined to cases in which Court fees are payable ad valorem. Our answer to the question referred is in the affirmative.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Achuta Bhatta v. Manjunathayya And Anr.
    (Jul 14, 1903)