Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Jwala Prasad v. E.I. Ry. Co.

    1. The plaintiffs brought a suit against the E.I Ry. Co. in the Court at Cawnpore for recovery of certain money deposited by them with the. Railway Co. in Calcutta. The Subordinate Judge held that the Cawnpore Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit, and ordered the plaint to be returned for presentation in the proper Court. An appeal was preferred from this order to the District Judge and the learned District Judge affirmed the decision of the Court of first instance.

    2. This is an application for revision of the appellate order of the District Judge. Admittedly no appeal lies from such an order. It is also admitted that the District Judge had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal before him. If in the exercise of his jurisdiction he committed an error (we do not hold that he did so), that does not give the applicants a right to apply in revision under Section 115 of the CPC. In our opinion this application cannot be entertained. We accordingly dismiss it with costs.

    V.B/R.K

    3. Application rejected.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Jwala Prasad v. E.I. Ry. Co.
    (May 16, 1918)