Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Debendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Official Receiver

    1. This is a plaintiff's appeal in a suit for recovery of arrears of rent. The Courts below have agreed in dismissing the suit on the ground that no notice under Section 80 of the CPC, was served on the defendant receiver. In view of the principle laid down in 61 IA 1711 we are of opinion that no notice under Section 80 of the CPC, is necessary in this case. The omission of the receiver to pay rent is not an act purporting to have been done by him in his official capacity.

    2. The result therefore is that this appeal is allowed.

    3. The judgment and decrees of the Courts below are set aside and the case is sent back to the trial Judge for re-hearing on the merits according to law. Costs will abide the result.

    D.S/R.K

    4. Case remanded.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Debendra Nath Roy Choudhury v. Official Receiver
    (May 18, 1937)