Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Seshagiri Row v. Nawab Askur Jung

    We think that the view of the learned Judge is correct [Mulchand Joharimal v. Suganchand Shivdas(4)) and is in accordance with the preponderance of authority as to the meaning of the words “cause of action” in article 12 of the Letters Patent. We dismiss the appeal with costs.

    Attorney for the appellant—Mr. S. Subbayya Chetti.

    Attorney for the respondent—Mr. James Short.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Seshagiri Row v. Nawab Askur Jung
    (Nov 30, 1903)