Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Judges

    Miran v. Emperor

    Banerji, J.:— This is an application in revision on behalf of six persons, who have been convicted under s. 147 read with ss. 149 and 332 of the Indian Penal Coda and sentenced to various berms of imprisonment, and they have been further directed to execute bonds with sureties under Section 106 of the Cr PC to keep the peace.

    2. On the 12th January, 1925, there was a wrestling match between Hasmat of Jalalabad and Inna of Kairana in the Chharian far at Kairana. This wrestling match, it appears, was under the patronage of the Municipal Board and the Municipality had invited policemen to keep peace and order in the fair. The wrestling match was a very evenly contested one and, according to the evidence of the Vice-Chairman, five minutes more were allowed be the wrestlers to finish the wrestling; but it appears that one Qazim Husain, constable, who was a backer of Hashmat, interfered with the wrestling. Thereafter there was a sort of scuffle and the net result was that some of the policemen were hustled and their uniform torn.

    3. It is very difficult in a case like this, where the backers of the wrestlers were grappled on the throat, to resist rushing the arena when a constable who was backer of one of the wrestlers was interfering; but that, however, will not permit the crowd or such of the members of the assembly present there to hustle the police who were there for the purpose of maintaining law and order. Having given my careful consideration to all that Sir Charles Boss Alston had to say in support of his case and the argument of the Assistant Government Advocate, I am of opinion that the whole of the incident was a very trivial affair; but the accused were no doubt technically guilty of the offence with which they were charged. I realise that the duty of controlling a crowd at these wrestling matches is a very serious duty and anybody interfering therewith must be punished. But under the circumstances of this case I am of opinion that the period of imprisonment already served by the petitioners is a sufficient punishment. I reduce the sentence to that already undergone. I maintain the sentences of fine. I do not thick it is in this case necessary to bind the accused under Section 106 of the Cr PC to keep the peace. I set aside the order directing the accused to execute bonds under that section.

    4. Sentences reduced.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Miran v. Emperor
    (Jul 7, 1925)