Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Case Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

    Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Raju And

    1. The question raised in this appeal depends upon the construction of section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, the relevant portion of which reads :

    "in respect of machinery or plant being new, which has been installed after the 31st day of March, 1954..."

    2. In the context of similar facts, this court construed similar words found in section 10(2)(via) of the Act in Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Mir Mohammad Ali ..

    3. The relevant part of that sub-section reads :

    "in respect of depreciation of buildings newly erected, or of machinery or plant being new which has been installed, after the 31st day of March, 1948..."

    4. Adverting to that clause, this court held in the case cited above that replacement of petrol engines in the buses by diesel engines earned the allowance within the meaning of the said clause. While the former provision gives allowance by development rebate, the latter provision gives it by way of depreciation allowance. But the condition that the machinery or plant should be new is common for both. Following the above judgment we dismiss the appeal.

    5. Appeal dismissed.

    Use AI to get other relevant cases.

    Comments

    Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Raju And
    (Dec 10, 1965)