Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

U.S. DENTAL v. HART ARMONK ASSOCIATES

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Nov 6, 2000
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion to vacate an order granting the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a judgment against them upon their default in appearing or answering. The defendants failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default (see, Bravo v. New York City Hous. Auth., 253 A.D.2d 510; Swedish v. Bourie, 233 A.D.2d 495; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382).