Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. COLLEY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Dec 21, 2001

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant did not object to the sentence imposed, nor did she move to withdraw her plea of guilty or vacate the judgment of conviction. Defendant therefore failed to preserve for our review her contention that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence ( see, People v. Perry, 252 A.D.2d 990, lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 929). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Contrary to defendant's contention, the court did not impose an enhanced sentence. The court informed defendant before she entered her plea that a fine would be imposed as part of the sentence and that the maximum fine would be $5,000. The further contention of defendant concerning the severity of the sentence does not survive her waiver of the right to appeal ( see, People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827).