Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL MOST v. WALKER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Aug 22, 2002
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Substantial compliance is acceptable as to details of form in a cover sheet to a designating petition. Here, the cover sheet as it related to Sam D. Walker substantially complied with the requirements of the Election Law and the regulations of the New York State Board of Elections (see Election Law ยง 6-134; 9 NYCRR 6215.6[a]; see also Matter of Ardesia v. Seidel, 242 A.D.2d 343; Matter of Fromson v. Lefever, 112 A.D.2d 1064, 1065, affd sub nom Matter of Barrett v. Scaringe, 65 N.Y.2d 946; Matter of Quintyne v. Canary, 104 A.D.2d 473, 474).

SANTUCCI, J.P., FLORIO, O'BRIEN, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.