United States v. Davis

PER CURIAM.

Submitted: June 26, 2024

Unpublished

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Davis appeals after the district court denied his motion for a sentence reduction under Guidelines Amendment 821. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief. See United States v. Tollefson, 853 F.3d 481, 485 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review). The court's Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction demonstrates that it was aware of and considered the relevant factors, including the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Rodd, 966 F.3d 740, 748 (8th Cir. 2020).

Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and affirm.