Vigil v. Midas Int'l Corp.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting an amended motion to quash service, denying a motion to dismiss, denying a motion to strike, and directing appellant to file an amended complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Veronica Barisich, Judge.

Our preliminary review of the documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the above-mentioned order. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

CADISH J. PICKERING J. BELL JUDGES 1

Hon. Veronica Barisich, District Judge Mike Vigil 2