Putnam v. United States Army Review Bd. Agency

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge

ORDER

CHARLES B. GOODWIN, United States District Judge

Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.