Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Hudson v. Doyle

Supreme Court of California
Jan 1, 1856

         JUDGES: The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt. Mr. Justice Terry concurred.

         OPINION

          HEYDENFELDT, Judge

         The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the object. If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.

         Judgment affirmed.