Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

Miller v. Rea

Supreme Court of California
Dec 17, 1886

         JUDGES: In Bank. Myrick, J. McKinstry, J., Morrison, C. J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          MYRICK, Judge

          [12 P. 432] Partition. Appeal by J. L. N. Shepard.

         A motion was made to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the appellant had not served the notice of appeal on all the adverse parties or their attorneys.

         The appeal is from specific parts of the interlocutory decree only, viz., the parts relating to certain portions of an undivided one sixteenth of the rancho Las Animas; the decree as to the remainder of the rancho is not involved in the appeal. The notice was served on the parties (or their attorneys) interested adversely to the appellant, in so much of the undivided one sixteenth as is involved in the appeal.

         The motion is denied.