- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Hurles v. Ryan
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 16, 2014
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The warden's Motion for Ruling on Respondent–Appellees' Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed February 1, 2013, is DENIED. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc with respect to the opinion filed together with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
-------- Notes:
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.