- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
Blinds to Go (U.S.), Inc. v. Times Plaza Dev., L.P.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Nov 20, 2013
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Kenneth J. Glassman, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Richard Gabriele of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated November 28, 2012, which denied its motion for leave to amend its answer.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for leave to amend its answer to assert additional affirmative defenses and counterclaims, as they were either palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit ( see T & V. Constr., Inc. v. Calapai, 90 A.D.3d 908, 909, 935 N.Y.S.2d 68; G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v. Lazzari, 44 A.D.3d 95, 99, 840 N.Y.S.2d 378, affd.10 N.Y.3d 941, 862 N.Y.S.2d 855, 893 N.E.2d 133).
RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.