SIGLER v. DOE

LEWIS BABCOCK, Judge

This case is before me on the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on September 22, 2011 (Docs 32, 33 and 35). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the recommendations are accepted as follows:

1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc 14) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

a. GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of the Plaintiff's claim under the UCC as against the Doe defendants; and DENIED insofar as it seeks dismissal of the UCC claim as against JP Morgan Chase;

b. GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of the Plaintiff's negligence claims; and

c. GRANTED to the extent it seeks dismissal of The Corporation Company.

2. Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc 20) is DENIED.